- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
- Messages
- 3,927
- Reaction score
- 921
I stopped reading at Garbrandt's
That was unnecessarily gay.
![Cody choke <codychoke> <codychoke>](https://i.imgur.com/al7QsM4.gif)
I stopped reading at Garbrandt's
That was unnecessarily gay.
Again...
You saying a lot but aren't giving any alternatives
I guess we just leave a healthy champion on the shelf
I'm not a fan of Cody Garbrandt, and was rooting for TJ in their fight, but since the whole UFC 222 thing went down and the UFC squashed the potential TJ/DJ fight Bang Ludwig has suggested that the UFC want Cody Garbrandt to win the title back.
That's probably true, he's a young, good looking dude with an exciting fighting style and KO power, but even though I'm not a fan of him it would be a terrible idea to give him an immediate rematch.
TJ pretty much had him figured out in round 2, at Kickboxing range Cody's boxing centric style was rendered pretty much useless, and although you can't count someone as good as Cody I'd favour TJ a lot in an immediate rematch.
But TJ is 32 years old, he only turned pro in 2010 so he doesn't have a lot of miles on him but he's in his prime right now, Cody is only 26 years old and has years left to improve.
If they wait 2-3 years for Cody to enter his prime and TJ to start to decline, I'd favour Cody in a rematch, that's why an immediate rematch would be a terrible idea for the UFC right now.
I'm not a fan by any stretch, but I could see the appeal. He's unusually heavy handed for bantamweight and has the wrestling to keep it on the feet or adapt when a fight isn't going his way.why you like Cody so much ?
They aren't gonna just cancel their main event for a cardGive the shot to Moraes or Rivera. Cancel their fight and give them new opponents.
I'd rather see Cruz fight TJ again than Cody
I'm not a fan of Cody Garbrandt, and was rooting for TJ in their fight, but since the whole UFC 222 thing went down and the UFC squashed the potential TJ/DJ fight Bang Ludwig has suggested that the UFC want Cody Garbrandt to win the title back.
That's probably true, he's a young, good looking dude with an exciting fighting style and KO power, but even though I'm not a fan of him it would be a terrible idea to give him an immediate rematch.
TJ pretty much had him figured out in round 2, at Kickboxing range Cody's boxing centric style was rendered pretty much useless, and although you can't count someone as good as Cody I'd favour TJ a lot in an immediate rematch.
But TJ is 32 years old, he only turned pro in 2010 so he doesn't have a lot of miles on him but he's in his prime right now, Cody is only 26 years old and has years left to improve.
If they wait 2-3 years for Cody to enter his prime and TJ to start to decline, I'd favour Cody in a rematch, that's why an immediate rematch would be a terrible idea for the UFC right now.
I should have mentioned that I'm speaking from the UFC's point of view, they want Cody to have the belt, he has a much better chance of beating TJ in 2 or 3 years than in an immediate rematch imo.Wait a few years until TJ is on the decline? How much shit would you eat just to peek at Cody’s ass?
This is the kind of thinking that didn’t let Wand vs Chuck happen when they were at their best.
I agree, unless it was a long reigning champion.Immediate title shots after a decisive first fight are a bad idea, period. The UFC loves them though.
From the UFC’s point of view, you nailed it.I should have mentioned that I'm speaking from the UFC's point of view, they want Cody to have the belt, he has a much better chance of beating TJ in 2 or 3 years than in an immediate rematch imo.
If they rematch and he loses he'll be in limbo for a while.
I'm not even a fan of Cody.
Even then, if they get fucking smoked then they need to come back and win a fight before getting a rematch. The only time I wouldn't be upset with an immediate rematch is a controversial decision or stoppage, or a case where the champion and the contender are 1-1 against each other. Eg. Fighter A beats fighter B, goes on to win the title ... then some point down the road Fighter B challenges for the title and beats Fighter A ... putting together an immediate rematch/rubbermatch in the scenario could make sense too.I agree, unless it was a long reigning champion.
youre acting like this is set in stone matchup. Jimmie is next for the strap you dweebI'm not a fan of Cody Garbrandt, and was rooting for TJ in their fight, but since the whole UFC 222 thing went down and the UFC squashed the potential TJ/DJ fight Bang Ludwig has suggested that the UFC want Cody Garbrandt to win the title back.
That's probably true, he's a young, good looking dude with an exciting fighting style and KO power, but even though I'm not a fan of him it would be a terrible idea to give him an immediate rematch.
TJ pretty much had him figured out in round 2, at Kickboxing range Cody's boxing centric style was rendered pretty much useless, and although you can't count someone as good as Cody I'd favour TJ a lot in an immediate rematch.
But TJ is 32 years old, he only turned pro in 2010 so he doesn't have a lot of miles on him but he's in his prime right now, Cody is only 26 years old and has years left to improve.
If they wait 2-3 years for Cody to enter his prime and TJ to start to decline, I'd favour Cody in a rematch, that's why an immediate rematch would be a terrible idea for the UFC right now.