Why doesn't Chris Weidman get credit for beating Anderson Silva?

Why doesn't Chris Weidman get credit for beating Anderson Silva?


  • Total voters
    190
Because Anderson wasn't taking the fight seriously. He was screwing around like an idiot rather than giving it his all. If he had fought straight (like he did against Leben and Franklin and so many others) and didn't try to be cute, he would have massacred Weidman. Anderson wasn't past it at that point and Weidman didn't do the impossible. He caught Anderson while Anderson was being a dumbass. Simple as that.

The second fight, Anderson broke his leg, so it doesn't really count.
 
That was the thing about MW at the time, there weren’t many good wrestlers. I’d say Sonnen was probably the best wrestler at that time. But his lack of grappling or jiu jitsu couldn’t prevent him from getting caught in submissions by higher level black belts.
Right now? An example of elite MW wrestling would be Khamzat or Bo Nickal. Okami doesn’t compare to them in that regard nor does Maia although they might find success with grappling or jiujitsu against them.

I would say Okami and Maia were good wrestlers but they weren’t elite there necessarily. Where they excelled was the grappling and jiu jitsu.
Mark Muñoz is a NCAA champion.
Anderson Silva should have fought Muñoz for you to claim he faced "elite wrestlers".

In my opinion, the way you approach the matter is classic sherbroism but to each his own
 
Mark Muñoz is a NCAA champion.
Anderson Silva should have fought Muñoz for you to claim he faced "elite wrestlers".

In my opinion, the way you approach the matter is classic sherbroism but to each his own
Munoz was a good wrestler too. But that means you have Sonnen and Munoz. Who else?

I would say your approach is reductionist and an over simplification of what’s going on. When people think greatest MMA wrestlers, they don’t include Demian Maia for a reason. If you ask people who has better wrestling between Maia and Munoz, they’re mostly going to say Munoz for a reason. Wrestling is a specific style. Just because you take someone down, it doesn’t always mean you have better wrestling.
 
Because Anderson wasn't taking the fight seriously. He was screwing around like an idiot rather than giving it his all. If he had fought straight (like he did against Leben and Franklin and so many others) and didn't try to be cute, he would have massacred Weidman. Anderson wasn't past it at that point and Weidman didn't do the impossible. He caught Anderson while Anderson was being a dumbass. Simple as that.

The second fight, Anderson broke his leg, so it doesn't really count.

As much as people don't want to admit it, this is 100% the truth. When you get two endings like that, they're not completely definitive and fans want a clear ending

You get these comments like Anderson couldn't do anything to him so he resorted to clowning cause he was frustrated. I saw Anderson get over a tough first round and basically was calm and waiting for him opportunities and was too relaxed at that point. Weidman was getting tired and those TDs were shrugged off easily and Anderson was opening up. Just got too comfortable.
 
Henderson and Sonnen were elite wrestlers, Okami was not far from that in MMA context.
Besides, Marquard and Lutter were good wrestlers too, and calling Maia "BJJ fighter" is, again, typical simpletomn sherbroism.
Maia took Jon Fitch down 7 times. The "BJJ fighter" took "the elite wrestler" down 7 times in 7 attempts. This fact has to scratch the head of your average simpleton sherbro.

Not to mention plenty of WWs wrestler could have moved up and expose the allegedly glaring weakness of the MW champion. We see fighters moving up a division all the time. Anderson himself moved up from WW, actually.

Okami wasn't close to being an elite wrestler in MMA terms lol. Also, Hendo was a completely different style of wrestler than Sonnen. Sonnen would shoot blast doubles and singles, while Hendo mostly did upper body takedowns. What kind of takedowns you do in MMA matters a lot, especially depending on your opponent. A good double followed by chain wrestling was always Silva's main issue. Silva did well against grapplers with upper body takedowns like Okami and Henderson (besides the one takedown Henderson landed) because his clinch was good

And its crazy to say that Maia was a good wrestler. Did he improve his takedowns as someone with a BJJ base? Yes. But he wasn't anywhere close to having great takedowns for the division, and a lot of his losses were because he couldn't get fights down to the ground. But what do I know, its not like I'm an upper belt in BJJ/Judo and have done wrestling before...

Back then, most fighters didn't move up in weight classes. It was pretty rare. GSP would have been the obvious one, but that never happened. It was more likely you would see a fighter move down, but at LHW, there wasn't that many wrestlers who wanted to as they were pretty big for the weight class, didn't want to cut the weight, or were challenging or close to challenging for the title already.
 
That was the thing about MW at the time, there weren’t many good wrestlers. I’d say Sonnen was probably the best wrestler at that time. But his lack of grappling or jiu jitsu couldn’t prevent him from getting caught in submissions by higher level black belts.
Right now? An example of elite MW wrestling would be Khamzat or Bo Nickal. Okami doesn’t compare to them in that regard nor does Maia although they might find success with grappling or jiujitsu against them.

I would say Okami and Maia were good wrestlers but they weren’t elite there necessarily. Where they excelled was the grappling and jiu jitsu.

^^^This right here. WW and LHW had all the wrestlers in the UFC during Silva's era. If you look at the MW rankings from around 2005 - 2010, it was primarily strikers and BJJ grapplers. With a few exceptions, it wasn't until around 2010-2012 and on that the new school of MW wrestlers started entering the division.

I'm not trashing Silva's record, but in no way are Patrick Cote, Thales Leites, and Travis Lutter elite fighters. But they managed to get shots at Silva because the division was pretty thin back then. When those types of fighters are getting title shots, it speaks to the lack of depth in the division.

So who deserves to be caled a good wrestler, if Maia, Okami, Sonnen or Henderson dont make it?

Mention WWs or MWs from Silva's generation, not just HW champion Cormier.

Okami and Maia pulled different style of TDs and were elite MMA wrestlers compared with ranked UFC fighters in any division, not just with Silva.

Again, its clear you weren't watching these fighters back then. Maia and Okami weren't traditional wrestlers. Okami is a judoka/bjj black belt. Maia is a BJJ black belt. Neither were good chain wrestlers/grapplers. Sonnen and Weidman are closer in style to chain wrestlers like Rashad Evans, Khabib, Jon Jones, or Merab. Guys like Maia, Okami, or Marquardt would shoot a double or single, and if they failed, give up the shot and go back to striking. That's what separated those fighters from the other names I listed who won titles or came close (Sonnen).

Mark Muñoz is a NCAA champion.
Anderson Silva should have fought Muñoz for you to claim he faced "elite wrestlers".

In my opinion, the way you approach the matter is classic sherbroism but to each his own

I was waiting for this name to be brought up. Mark Munoz was an NCAA champion, but his wrestling didn't translate well to MMA. The UFC was trying hard to get him a championship match back then, but he always fell short against any decent contender because his MMA wrestling wasn't as great as it was made out to be, and his hands weren't good enough to make up the difference either. He was basically a gatekeeper throughout his entire career and ended with a 14-6 record.
 
Munoz was a good wrestler too. But that means you have Sonnen and Munoz. Who else?

I would say your approach is reductionist and an over simplification of what’s going on. When people think greatest MMA wrestlers, they don’t include Demian Maia for a reason. If you ask people who has better wrestling between Maia and Munoz, they’re mostly going to say Munoz for a reason. Wrestling is a specific style. Just because you take someone down, it doesn’t always mean you have better wrestling.

Definitely agree with all of that except for Munoz being a great wrestler. I remember Munoz well from back then. Like I said above, his wrestling wasn't that great for MMA. It was good for wrestling, but in MMA, a lot of his takedowns got stuffed. Below is a good example. Munoz was from that older school of wrestling/grappling where a double could get you into the top 10. But once all the new school strikers with good TDD, chain wrestlers, and more complete fighters came along, Munoz's style was outdated.

 
He gets credit from me. He mauled Anderson in the first round of both fights. Dropped Anderson in the second fight in the first round. The leg break was from a textbook check. Clowning around is part of Anderson strategy and he paid for it in the first fight.

Weidmans peak was extremely short lived though. He accumulated to much damage and the Iv ban and usada didn't help him. He looked good against Romero and gastellum though so idk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HHJ
Definitely agree with all of that except for Munoz being a great wrestler. I remember Munoz well from back then. Like I said above, his wrestling wasn't that great for MMA. It was good for wrestling, but in MMA, a lot of his takedowns got stuffed. Below is a good example. Munoz was from that older school of wrestling/grappling where a double could get you into the top 10. But once all the new school strikers with good TDD, chain wrestlers, and more complete fighters came along, Munoz's style was outdated.


Mousasi is a great grappler in his own right, and Munoz was starting to slow down so I wouldn't really hold that against him. But yeah like I said good wrestler, not great.
 
^^^This right here. WW and LHW had all the wrestlers in the UFC during Silva's era. If you look at the MW rankings from around 2005 - 2010, it was primarily strikers and BJJ grapplers. With a few exceptions, it wasn't until around 2010-2012 and on that the new school of MW wrestlers started entering the division.

I'm not trashing Silva's record, but in no way are Patrick Cote, Thales Leites, and Travis Lutter elite fighters. But they managed to get shots at Silva because the division was pretty thin back then. When those types of fighters are getting title shots, it speaks to the lack of depth in the division.
Yeah, Anderson has one of those quantity over quality records. And then people tend to give him credit for the opponents that his best wins beat like Belfort and Henderson.
 
bullshit

Anderson tried hard to duck Weidman for a reason. and not just because he was older

Weidman won every minute of both fights standing and grappling. every single minute. thats not just age

anyone that thinks Weidman got a "fluke" win 2 times in a row, both by stoppage, is delusional and probably thinks their favorite fighters are unbeatable super heros. pro wrestling fans
Silva wasn't ducking lol. Vitor should've gotten the shot over Chris but UFC wanted a fresh match despite Chris being relatively new and unknown.

Silva was already past his prime which in hindsight was obvious when pillow fist sonnen dropped him.

He went from eating clean shots from 1 hit ko artists like they're tic taco to that... then on top of it he clowned way more than normal... he treated Chris like Maia and leites and paid for it
 
\he treated Chris like Maia and leites and paid for it
How can you say that.

He was BEATING Maia and Leites. They couldnt land anything on him. Exact opposite of Chris.

He was losing this fight as soon as the bell rang, why would he "not take it seriously" after that pretty disastrous first round?

It makes NO SENSE.

Henderson was able to win the first round against him, you didnt see him acting like he wasnt taking it serious in the 2nd.
 
Cos we all seen that shit.


51ddc5474b324.image.jpg

Weidman absolutely won both fights...no doubt and is credited as such..

But did Weidman beat Silva or did Silva beat Silva both times...

Both can be true...


That said ... Weidman should absolutely be respected for what he did at MW...
 
Weidman absolutely won both fights...no doubt and is credited as such..

But did Weidman beat Silva or did Silva beat Silva both times...

Both can be true...
How can that be true when Weidman knocked Anderson out?
 
How can that be true when Weidman knocked Anderson out?
Although thats undoubtedly the outcome..

Lets not pretend like Anderson Silva wasn't playing and dancing, and show boating moments before....


Had Anderson not done that... does Weidman get that opportunity i dunno ... Maybe...maybe not is more likely..

And in the rematch... Silva litterally destroyed his own leg...
 
Lets not pretend like Anderson Silva wasn't playing and dancing, and show boating moments before....
He was doing that because whatever he was doing before obviously wasnt working.
 
He was doing that because whatever he was doing before obviously wasnt working.

I dunno about that... Silva has been show boating and winning for years before then...he just simply did it too often and went back to well too many times and eventually fell in
 
K

Full credits to Chris Weidman then
Absolutely...he still needed throw the strike that KOed Silva and he did...

But Silva played a major role in both those loses ...

Both can be true...

Weidman knocked Silva DEAD in the first fight no doubt
 
Back
Top