- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Messages
- 13,758
- Reaction score
- 8,068
Kid- go away and play. Adults are talking.
pangnat bless
what a liar bitch you are boy
Kid- go away and play. Adults are talking.
pangnat bless
Kennedy win wasn't really controversial, Kennedy cheated at the end of Round 2 and almost knocked Yoel out because of it. Sure, Yoel had a bit of a break on the stool, but it was the UFC cut man who shagged it by leaving too much vaseline on his face. Yoel got up and smashed Kennedy, not that controversial.Romero has a strong case, that's for sure.
If it's not because the Kennedy and Jacare wins are pretty controversial..
Dando is definitely top 4-5. UFC title isnt the win all be all and neither or subjective numbers ( I understand u have to go by something). Dan, like moose , fought anyone at any weight ...... and won more than he lost in those fights. I'd like to transcend prime hendo and his talent into discussion.Maybe at "185" , hes not 2nd but look what 48 year old hendo did to bisping .What’s your answer? I respect the amount of research you put into your replies
And also has a win over the only guy to beat Jon Jones in Matt Hamill.
Rockhold (#9) vs Kennedy (unranked) - July 24th rankingsIf someone presents a list in which Munoz is considered top5 and Kennedy isn't considered at all...call it non-partisan data if you wish; your criteria is flawed as fuck.
By the way, for "data" we already have wikipedia
Rockhold (#9) vs Kennedy (unranked) - July 24th rankings
Weidman (#10) vs Munoz (#3) - June 27th rankings
You seem to be presenting a lot of your own opinions and bias into your thesis here.
The irony of this conversation is I'm probably one of the 3 people on Sherdog that actually watched every Strikeforce Challenger card in it's entirety.I know where they ranked. I know the bias towards UFC in the rankings too. Or you think rankigs are God's word?
If your criteria is 100% based on what stats say...again, what's the difference between you and wikipedia?
Kennedy was a quality win, about as much if not more than Munoz. If you have actually watched them fight of course; if your only reference is what stats say, then is another story. But I dont even get the point of getting into a discussion when stats already tell you literally everything that matters for you, honestly.
I know where they ranked. I know the bias towards UFC in the rankings too. Or you think rankigs are God's word?
If your criteria is 100% based on what stats say...again, what's the difference between you and wikipedia?
Kennedy was a quality win, about as much if not more than Munoz. If you have actually watched them fight of course; if your only reference is what stats say, then is another story. But I dont even get the point of getting into a discussion when stats already tell you literally everything that matters for you, honestly.
Stats have to account as well, but to say someone unranked is a bigger win than someone ranked #3 is just sillyness. If perhaps Kennedy was #6 or something you could make an argument, but regardless an unranked fighter is in no way a better win than someone ranked #3.
The irony of this conversation is I'm probably one of the 3 people on Sherdog that actually watched every Strikeforce Challenger card in it's entirety.
Vitor had some bad losses later, but his wins at MW are quite impressive:
Franklin
Rumble
Bisping
Rockhold
Henderson
All finishes.
Of course, there is always that asterisk <45>, and he lost too many times to really consider him, but I just wanted to mention that nice little run.
good question. tough answer. I don't have a clear cut answer. consideration: Hendo, Franklin, Weidman, bisping, adesanya,
there's arguments for both. who's the #2 mw in your opinion and why?Franklin? Bisping? Solid fighters but 2nd best ever...wtf
Wow lot of people saying Franklin. So wins over Nate Quarry and Evan Tanner make you a goat, just because they happened in the ufc?
![]()