White privilege diminishes our humanity: 10 Commitments for meaningful change

[NoDak]

Who are you referring to as the black and brown people of Europe?

I seriously doubt it, but perhaps he means prior to us becoming white due to the geographic location, isolation and climatic environment where low light levels would favor paler skin? It's predominantly due to the SNP variations of the genes SLC45A2 [rs16891982 (G;G)] and SLC24A5 [rs1426654 (A;A)] that swept the continent to lead to the depigmentation of us little modern Euros.

The latter alone is a particular AIM of interest that accounts for up to 38% of the skin tone differences between modern Europeans and Sub-Saharan Africans. It's still the same ancestral populations we're sprung from, they just had brown skin and that's not a bad thing!

That's what weird people's footprints look like that want to be there but keep slipping off because the whites keep rolling them back down into the abyss.

Are we the all-time p4p #1 baddies on the planet? That makes more sense though, I mean how hard would it be to draw realistic human footprints?

To make up for it, I've attached an entirely random photo of my footprint.

 

[NoDak]

So white people of today are going to deal with a "reckoning".

That kind of rhetoric is becoming more openly common.

 

[Soul Crusher]

I don't mean to absolve others for their sins against the world. All of humanity is guilty of that. But it's also true that nations get judged. The Western world gained their position through murder and conquest. They use their current position for more murder and conquest in order to continue dominating the world. Remember, it's not just individual crimes being committed but rather an entire world system, a satanic beast system, being set up to enslave everyone. There has to be a judgement for that at some point. Thats all I'm saying.

Sure the world is going to get it when we least expect it but you have to remember there are minorities that pay taxes and in some cases have been doing so for a long time. There is blood on their hands too so it's not just white people. Countries aren't dominated by white people and everyone has agreed to be a part of this world system.

No doubt this can't go on forever.

 

[method115]

Also, hard no to every point on that list and the last suggestion of making friends with black people just because they are black is insulting to black people and would creep them the fuck out.

This reminds me of the people I would run into in my high-school days. It rarely happens these days but there was a time where every now and then I would run into a guy who was so friendly and way to eager to be cool with me and I never had any proof but I'm damn near positive it's cause I looked black.

There was this one time I was super fucked up on XTC and having a real hard time maintaining my sanity. There was this older guy hanging out with us maybe 22 we were 16\17. He constantly kept calling me over to talk to him outside and tell me how he likes me cause "I'm down". It was so fucking annoying.

 

[IDL]

The tribe of Judea are easily the most privileged according to these ideologies, no doubt.

An international program to guilt them and instill resentment towards them should commence immediately.

Wouldn't it be funny if the white privilege stuff was actually being promoted to distract from how much power the tribe of Judea is accumulating? Hah! That would be crazy.

 

[fallable]

It is a social engineering strategy to apply Collective guilt techniques on target demographics, and is part of an ideological subversion program that is international in scope.

An international program to guilt them and instill resentment towards them should commence immediately.

Would you agree that certain populations are susceptible and certain populations are not susceptible to this tactic?

For whatever reason, people of Northern Europeans descent, or at least a significant percentage of them, seem especially susceptible to these guilt campaigns. Whereas I don't see any other populations ceding ground as a result of collective guilt and I don't expect to see it either.

The people who perpetrate this subversion seem to have delved deep into Northern European psychology and discovered this peculiarity and subsequently weaponized it. The thing is that it is not only effective at infusing guilt into Northern Europeans, but also generating animosity against them from other groups who also internalize the narrative. Collective guilt and victim narrow go hand in hand.

 

[mixcontactsport]

The tribe of Judea are easily the most privileged according to these ideologies, no doubt.

An international program to guilt them and instill resentment towards them should commence immediately.

Wouldn't it be funny if the white privilege stuff was actually being promoted to distract from how much power the tribe of Judea is accumulating? Hah! That would be crazy.

if you believe that, then do you believe in race privilege in the West? I'm not blaming White people, I believe the endgame of this all isn't truly about race.

 

[IDL]

if you believe that, then do you believe in race privilege in the West? I'm not blaming White people, I believe the endgame of this all isn't truly about race.

Race is too vague to be meaningful. Within such a major grouping lies a plethora of subgroups.

There is something to be said for being a majority demographic in a general sense, although often times minority groups excel further than majority demographics so it's hard to quantify.

 

[ocfightfan]

The concept of white privilege is an anti-white racist conspiracy theory. As though the cracker who lives in the trailer park is privileged above the owner of BET or any of the 70% of the NBA who are black.

As though Eddie Murphy's old SNL sketch, "White Like Me", were the literal truth.



I would care so much, but its clear that this shit won't stop when white people are a minority. It's too politically useful to let everyone else off the hook for their own mistakes and failures and to shift blame onto all white people forever. And the sad part is the majority of non-white people will never really see their lives improve because the elites who benefit from this garbage will be raking it in while keeping them in an infantile state.

 

[mixcontactsport]

Race is too vague to be meaningful. Within such a major grouping lies a plethora of subgroups.

There is something to be said for being a majority demographic in a general sense, although often times minority groups excel further than majority demographics so it's hard to quantify.

yes there are subgroups, but in the West especially America, most Whites are mixed, same goes for Blacks and Hispanics, they're all mixed.
Yes I believe in majority privilege, but when I say privilege I don't mean the most successful group on average. I literally just mean there is preference for certain groups, or race.

 

[evansusmc2]

I don't justify future murders. I'm just explaining that it might happen because of past murders(and everything else).

By that logic, blacks would be killing each other today due to them constantly murdering each other in the current times. OH uuumm well, I guess they are already accomplishing that.... never mind..

The Caucasion race is living in lands that are not originally theirs

There is no way you can expect anyone to take you seriously after typing that.
Human clans have conquered each other throughout history before modern laws (or common sense and rationale) ever existed. There is no recorded history or any way to determine who was where first or second. I've seen scholars fumble over themselves trying to figure this out.

, mind controlling the original population, and stealing their identity. That's happening today.

Who the hell is teaching you this crap? I'm gonna find your Social Studies teacher and put him (or her) out of their misery.

Why? Because they don't want people of color to understand that they have a legal claim to this land and Europe. Why don't they want them to understand this? Because they want to keep it for themselves, their people, and their civilizations. That's called white supremacy.

oohhhh hell, looks like I'm gonna need a double-wide casket to make room for your history teacher AND your jail house legal advisor.

You guys are in a position where you have to lie to the world and hide the past in order to maintain the current power structure. Which I understand. The only problem is that everything done in the dark will soon come to light.

OH OK, now I have to dig a few more graves for your fortune teller AND his crystal ball? uuuuugghhh this is just gonna be too much work.

You're bloodline overthrew the black and brown people of Europe, including Germany, and then blotted them out of history.

Again, you don't know shit about my nor anyone elses bloodline. You are just tossing out a cast guesstimate. That's really all you or anyone else can do.

Not sure why you're so focused on Africa.

OH don't get me started with Haiti as well.

 

[NoDak]

Would you agree that certain populations are susceptible and certain populations are not susceptible to this tactic?

For whatever reason, people of Northern Europeans descent, or at least a significant percentage of them, seem especially susceptible to these guilt campaigns. Whereas I don't see any other populations ceding ground as a result of collective guilt and I don't expect to see it either.

The people who perpetrate this subversion seem to have delved deep into Northern European psychology and discovered this peculiarity and subsequently weaponized it. The thing is that it is not only effective at infusing guilt into Northern Europeans, but also generating animosity against them from other groups who also internalize the narrative. Collective guilt and victim narrow go hand in hand.

Yes, there are. And yes, we are.

The collective guilt and humbling submission to multiculturalism would appear to be an almost uniquely Northern European psychosocial phenomenon, and there are likely myriad reasons behind it. We've got a 'problematic' recent history and have been made representative - if not made ourselves - of a particular ideal. In the context of America, that included being the favored caste by law all the way up to the late 1960s.

The US did have a policy of virtual open borders between 1880-1920 before deciding it wanted to strictly limit immigration with overt favorability towards Northwestern Europeans and 'Nordic' physical features. This was also at a time when the American eugenics movement was at its peak and the NSDAP was about to take off in Germany.

The Immigration Act of 1924, including the National Origins Act, and Asian Exclusion Act (Pub.L. 68–139, 43 Stat. 153, enacted May 26, 1924), was a United States federal law that set quotas on the number of immigrants from certain countries while providing funding and an enforcement mechanism to carry out the longstanding (but hitherto unenforced) ban on other non-white immigrants. The law was primarily aimed at further decreasing immigration of Southern Europeans, Eastern Europeans, Arabs and Jews.

The law affirmed the longstanding ban on the immigration of other non-white persons, with the exception of black African immigrants (who had long been exempt from the ban). Thus, virtually all Asians were forbidden from immigrating to America under the Act. Subsequent court rulings would determine that Indians were not white and could not immigrate.

 

[original doom]

Whites are a global minority. Don't fall for the bullshit.

best real estate though.

 

[NoDak]

I don't hate anybody. I was born in America, but I feel like a foreigner here.

We have to shake you out of this, it's eating you up. :-[

 

[TheComebackKid]

By that logic, blacks would be killing each other today due to them constantly murdering each other in the current times. OH uuumm well, I guess they are already accomplishing that.... never mind..


There is no way you can expect anyone to take you seriously after typing that.
Human clans have conquered each other throughout history before modern laws (or common sense and rationale) ever existed. There is no recorded history or any way to determine who was where first or second. I've seen scholars fumble over themselves trying to figure this out.

Who the hell is teaching you this crap? I'm gonna find your Social Studies teacher and put him (or her) out of their misery.

oohhhh hell, looks like I'm gonna need a double-wide casket to make room for your history teacher AND your jail house legal advisor.


OH OK, now I have to dig a few more graves for your fortune teller AND his crystal ball? uuuuugghhh this is just gonna be too much work.


Again, you don't know shit about my nor anyone elses bloodline. You are just tossing out a cast guesstimate. That's really all you or anyone else can do.




OH don't get me started with Haiti as well.

Hey man, we can just agree to disagree. No need to be sitting here lobbing insults at each other. I will just leave you with this:

This is the emblem of America as late as 1798 and hung in Britain. This shows the general view of the Americas by the people of Europe at the time...copper colored, 'black' Indians. This was the literal face of the new world. And I must say it's a nice picture, I'd want to come here too.

Here is the definition of 'American' as late as 1828....

The identity and title of 'American' used to refer to native 'black people' but was then stolen and given over to the descendants of white Europeans. Identity theft!

 

[Tiny]

Obviously nobody likes to be singled out on the basis of race or made to be a standard-bearer for any one demographic, a factor beyond their control.

You have a bunch of white kids on the internet mad about being grouped into post-colonial abuses and other accused biases, understandable

Saying that privilege should be recognized in how we handle things doesn't need to be such a sensitive, hot-button issue for you though. Take modern medicine.

Vaccines are by and large developed by wealthier nations with the resources to spare on R&D - it's effectively a privilege to possess the resources to make those advancements. Most medical professionals have argued that there is a responsibility to share these resources in the medical field with countries whose medical technology lacks the funding. If you come from advantageous positions, you have more potential resources to share with those that have-not. It's the reason why we enlist the help of wealthy donors at fundraisers for poor charities, that power dynamic can do a lot of good when it comes from a place of advantage and transfers its resources to a place of less advantages

Blaming privilege or general resource retention for being itself, isn't helpful, absolutely. But to say that positions of advantage have an opportunity to better the conditions of those with less advantage is not far-out or too aggressive to consider

Id sooner acknowledge hieght privledge or attractive privledge or weight privledge before i ever acknowledge white privledge

 

[Gunny]

By being arrogant enough to claim that you're privileged... Implies that you are better than other people. Which is why minorities don't even use the term.

Only white losers who were told to feel bad and guilty about something they have no control over use the term privileged. Could you stick your fucking nose in the air any higher?

While you’re certainly right about white progressives, plenty of minorities use that term including in this forum.

 

[Gunny]

Id sooner acknowledge hieght privledge or attractive privledge or weight privledge before i ever acknowledge white privledge

Don’t forget the greatest privilege of all - pussy privlidge

 

[TheComebackKid]

Who are you referring to as the black and brown people of Europe?

Here is Ben Franklin's description of the Europe and the world during his time:

Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth.

Swarthy = Dark skinned

Tawny = yellow, brown

Saint Maurice of the Roman Empire

Henry the 2nd

Families and names today described as Angelo Saxon but with black faces on their family crests:

Spoiler

Here are some descriptions of famous Europeans we all think are white:

Spoiler

In James M. Kittleson’s ‘Luther the Reformer: the Story of the Man and His Career pg. 43 – The Protestant reformer Martin Luther is described as a SWARTHY man of medium height.

In a Short History of Germany by Emily Hawtrey and Amanda Flattery – Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor due to his black swarthy complexion, he’s known also as: Enrique III El Negro de Alemania, Henry the Black (Le Noir) or Den Svarte,

William Robertson states in the Book “The Reign of Charles V, Vol 3, pg 441 – At noon Bishop Carranza, Archbishop of Toledo, who had long been expected arrived at Yuste. He was the same ‘black friar’ – so called from his swarthy visage-.

Pope Urban VI is describe in the book “Saint Catherine of Siena and Her Times” by Mademoiselle Mori as being born of a Neapolitan father and a Tuscan mother, he was short stoutly made and swarthy, with fiery black eyes.

Ruler of Milan Ludovico Sforza was one of the sons of Fransesco Sforza, Ludovico was known as “the Moor” (his complexion was swarthy). (ref. Travel Guide to Europe, 1492: Ten Itineraries in the Old World — by L. Camusso)

Byantine emperor John II Komnenos (1118-1143) is described by Latin historian William of Tyre as short with eyes, hair and complexion so dark he was known as ‘the Moor’.

Peter the Great of Russia is also described as having black eyes and hair with a swarthy complexion. (ref. A general collection of …voyages and travels, digested – by J. Pinkerton)

In the book “Peter the Great: His Life and World”, Mr. Massie describes the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold of the Hapsburgs as swarthy, of middling height, with the projecting lower jaw and protruding lower lip which traditionally marked (if not disfigured) the Hapsburgs.

in case your unfamilar with the term SWARTHY: Defined – swart, swarth, suart, [sweart = black; Dut. swart: Celt. svartr: Danish. sort: Swedish. Swart: German. Swarz: — Of a black or dark color: swarthy. (Applied especially to the skin)

https://www.africaresource.com/rast...ngly-lines-of-europe-moorish-kings-of-europe/

 

[Deus Ex Machina]

By being arrogant enough to claim that you're privileged... Implies that you are better than other people. Which is why minorities don't even use the term.



Only white losers who were told to feel bad and guilty about something they have no control over use the term privileged. Could you stick your fucking nose in the air any higher?

Bravo, that is simply the most succint and perfect response to the whole idiotic notion of white privellege.

I accept there are predjudiced people in the world but they exist in all colours and creeds, you cannot solve this by forming a mob and besmirching anyone who does not fully comply with the group think, this only divides us further.
Black people had a tough start in the USA but until we put that in the past and move on there will always be conflict.
Some people will never be happy no matter what you do, we just have to stop listening to these people and thinking we can appease them, it's not possible.

Maybe we could try just treating each other as equals rather than looking at blacks as victims, that is patronising and the real modern racism.