• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

International White people mad at Sweden creating historical documentaries about their own country…

tastaylvr

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
4,958
Reaction score
5,470



According to David Reich, DNA analysis has shown that Western Hunter Gatherers were typically dark skinned, dark haired, and blue eyed.[42] The dark skin was due to their Out-of-Africa origin (all Homo sapiens populations having had initially dark skin), while the blue eyes were the result of a variation in their OCA2 gene, which caused irisdepigmentation.[43]

Archaeologist Graeme Warren has said that their skin color ranged from olive to black, and speculated that they may have had some regional variety of eye and hair colors.[44]This is strikingly different from the distantly related eastern hunter-gatherers (EHG)—who have been suggested to be light-skinned, brown-eyed or blue eyed and dark-haired or light-haired.[45]
 
GYO-dhMXAAAxR23

…and here I thought all along that the first Swedes looked like that.
 
They seem to have gotten their hunter-gatherers a bit confused.

"study by Günther et al. (2018) further discovered that SHGs "show a combination of eye color varying from blue to light brown and light skin pigmentation. This is strikingly different from the WHGs—who have been suggested to have the specific combination of blue eyes and dark skin and EHGs—who have been suggested to be brown-eyed and light-skinned".


The people are suggested to have had dark skin/blue eyes (WHGs) were more prevalent in the Western part of Europe, though groups of them surely stumbled into Scandinavia as well. It is also unknown what shade of "dark" they would've been, it's just as likely that they were more comparable to Mediterranean/Middle Eastern people, than Sub-Saharan African. All that is known is that they lacked the gene generally associated with bringing about lightly pigmented skin in European peoples.
 
Last edited:
Bogus theory sounds bogus

What's more likely
1. Their speculation of what happened 300K years ago is correct
2. Politics and optics is making the Swedish state TV publish DEI bullshit

Obviously 2. It's like when astronomers claim they know how the universe started. Bitch you can't even get off your home rock, you think you know something? Sit the fuck down.
 
Did we all originate from Africa ? Or did this change too?
Yeah, Egypt to Middle East (fertile crescent) so definitely seems brown. If you hold to adaptation then the darker colors (black) and white would have developed from these as they moved to regions where the skin color had advantages. Closest genetically to mummies are peeps from Jordan, Israel and Lebanon. Ultimately it makes no real difference the shade of the original humans.
 
Early life sections don't hold any surprises.

Didn't we all originate from Africa ? Or did this change too?
The theories about all humans originating from Africa have been long debunked at this point thanks to DNA studies. In fact it is more likely, that humanoids travelled southwards from the modern day balkans. There has been intermixing between humanoids that resulted in current ethnicities.
 
Yeah, Egypt to Middle East (fertile crescent) so definitely seems brown. If you hold to adaptation then the darker colors (black) and white would have developed from these as they moved to regions where the skin color had advantages. Closest genetically to mummies are peeps from Jordan, Israel and Lebanon. Ultimately it makes no real difference the shade of the original humans.
Humans are really from the southern part of Africa. I think what you’re thinking of is the cradle of civilization, where the first known civilizations began. That is in the middle east
 
Humans are really from the southern part of Africa. I think what you’re thinking of is the cradle of civilization, where the first known civilizations began. That is in the middle east
Could be. Either way it doesnt really matter in the end what shade they were.
 
People should know that Swedish tax payers are paying for this state TV/RADIO. And are forced to do so. It's not something you can opt out of. It's taxed.

And they continually produce woke and PC shit and spreading nothing but leftist perspectives on their news outlet which is one of the biggest in Sweden.
 
Back
Top