A podcast, man? No other sources? No news about this even though it's ahigh profile case? Not even timestamps? Come on....
Found it on audible, but don't have a subscription or the time right now to listen
Die größte Vielfalt nur bei Audible: Hörbücher, Hörspiele & Original Podcasts ✓On- und offline hören ✓Beste Autoren & Stimmen ✓Das 1. Hörbuch ist gratis.
www.audible.com
Been trying to Google extra information to see if this podcast was covered in any way in text so that it's contents could be read, but nothing so far.
There's a podcast somewhere in one of these threads that details everything, as I mentioned earlier in this same thread. The ratio for adults to children was deemed off.
That's pretty typical, unfortunately. Especially considering it's a daycare out of someone's house as opposed to a facility, this is kind of a stereotype, where one adult, usually with experience of supervising children, try to work privately in their older age so they just make their house a daycare, but there's a specific ratio of children:staff daycare must have, so they depend on people who are around, but not technically staff. I think that's reportedly what happened here too, where the mother still needed to watch a group, but Cain's son had to go to the bathroom, but reportedly needed help with the zipper so Goularte went with him, despite being a resident, not employee.
On one hand, anyone who knows anyone who operates a business out of their home knows how grey the divide between the work and the home becomes, and that family are just going to help you operate it without being payroll, but on the other hand, this isn't a corner you can cut for this specific reason, where you now had a kid in a bathroom alone with a "non-employee."
It's like the psychos here would prefer it to come out the kid actually was diddled, just so they could justify Cain's behaviour and would take it as a win.
Surely the best outcome would be if it transpired the kid was confused and made a mistake, and everyone involved can move on.
Of course if the guy is guilty everyone wants to see him punished, but it's amazing/frightening how people jump to conclusions after reading a headline and skimming an article. Even if the guy is cleared they'll cry foul play and spew the normal BS "if I were Cain I'd kidnap the nonce and torture him to death".
Yeah, if he's found guilty, they can pat themselves on the back about a kid being molested, but if he's found not guilty then it's because "California is a haven for




philes." I don't know how public the documents will be made, but I do really hope there's compelling evidence to show this was a misunderstanding. Cain's kid is young enough that a misinterpretation can still just be unlearned and suffer no trauma, real or perceived.