- Joined
- May 12, 2016
- Messages
- 14,766
- Reaction score
- 11,843
If people rating Fury Top 5 aren't aware of the older champs then there's really no point in them rating anybody in the all-time heavyweight rankings. Fury has retired several times so he'd be credited with less than 7 lineal title defenses. Not to mention most of them aren't even notable. He only has 3 WBC title defenses. Usyk has only had a handful of fights at the weight and he already has 2 defenses as a unified champion. The Top 5 ATGs had proper title reigns whether that was a single unbroken run or multiple reigns. Fury hasn't.I do think he'd be ranked about 5th on everyones list even if it's because people aren't aware of all the older champs. He'd be where Marciano is. I think Marciano is usually about 5th. Hes not the 5th best HW champ either but because hes undefeated he is boosted.
Marciano struggled to beat old champs who weren't good enough to be champs in their physical prime and beat Louis when he was 37. Hes got a few other solid wins Rex Layne might be the GOAT to never get a title shot but for pre alphabet era ATG resume Marcianos resume is pretty light. Fury actually has more lineal title defenses(7) than Marciano(6) by at least 1(if you count the 10 rounders its 3). Marciano has more impressive pre title fights but if Marcianos resume is deeper than Furys it's close especially if Fury beats Usyk. People mock Furys level of competition because he avoided AJ and Usyk but it's worth noting Furys 12 round title opponents are 14-1 after fighting him.