- Joined
- Dec 21, 2022
- Messages
- 4,331
- Reaction score
- 13,105
Never.
Some of those things dont rate with me.Massive fan of the spider, even though he went on a losing run there was always some kind of hope and i think he retired when it was gone.
- Lost to Chris, was taunting,
- Lost again again and snapped his leg
- Got a W vs Diaz but was a NC
- Lost a close one to Bisping in which he landed one of the nicest knockout blows and rocked him from an upkick
- Lost to DC in which he hurt him and pretty much got layed on most of that fight
- Beat Bruson, granted it was close
- Lost to Izzy in good showing on his part considering his age
- Hurt his leg Vs Jared Cannonier
- Got knocked out by Hall and retired
I know it looks bad on paper but it's not as bad as it looks once you break it down.
It is unrealistic in 99% of cases so people avoid it.After beating Stephen Bonnar, 17 fight win streak.
Just curious why many are selecting after the 2nd Weidman fight? What does Silva gain from losing twice to Weidman breaking his leg? Why not retire as a champion and still on top?
According to Sherdog never. You need to "gO OuT oN yOuR sHiELd" otherwise you are a coward and ducking someone and scared, potentially even shook.I know we got the magic of hindsight to guide us.
But I'd say after the second fight with Weidman, where he broke his leg. I think he should have retired after that.
Reason I say that, is because he was going to get an immediate rematch title shot after losing the Weidman the first time.
So it's reasonable to go for that rematch. But after that devastating loss with his leg break, he should have ended it there. He was never the same after.
I believe he was 37 years old if he retired right after the second fight with Weidman. His record would've been 33-6.
Whilst I have no problem with fighters looking out for their health long term yeah I do kind of think that a real GOAT keeps trying to win big fights as long as he can rather than retiring early to preserve his rep.Anderson is a fighter. He gave all he had out there until there was nothing left
Thats how a GOAT contender should go. Thats the fighting spirit.
Retiring when you are still good to go is a pussy move. Thats why guys like GSP or Khabib wont be in my GOAT lists, despite being skilled as hell
Guys like anderson, fedor, aldo, look at their careers. Anderson fought DC for Christ sake. He could have sat on AS for whatever minutes and he still went out there
He stopped having good fights a long time ago there.Anderson didn't even want to retire when UFC pretty much made the decision for him, he still wanted to compete. Plus he signed a lucrative 12 fight deal towards the end of his champ run so he was getting paid big by UFC standards right to the end.
After beating Stephen Bonnar, 17 fight win streak.
Just curious why many are selecting after the 2nd Weidman fight? What does Silva gain from losing twice to Weidman breaking his leg? Why not retire as a champion and still on top?
Because he was still a wizard at the time and showed no sign of slowing down.After beating Stephen Bonnar, 17 fight win streak.
Just curious why many are selecting after the 2nd Weidman fight? What does Silva gain from losing twice to Weidman breaking his leg? Why not retire as a champion and still on top?
I know we got the magic of hindsight to guide us.
But I'd say after the second fight with Weidman, where he broke his leg. I think he should have retired after that.
Reason I say that, is because he was going to get an immediate rematch title shot after losing the Weidman the first time.
So it's reasonable to go for that rematch. But after that devastating loss with his leg break, he should have ended it there. He was never the same after.
I believe he was 37 years old if he retired right after the second fight with Weidman. His record would've been 33-6.
![]()
Most definitely after Sonnen 2. Most people are saying the Bonnar fight but that was conpletely unplanned.I know we got the magic of hindsight to guide us.
But I'd say after the second fight with Weidman, where he broke his leg. I think he should have retired after that.
Reason I say that, is because he was going to get an immediate rematch title shot after losing the Weidman the first time.
So it's reasonable to go for that rematch. But after that devastating loss with his leg break, he should have ended it there. He was never the same after.
I believe he was 37 years old if he retired right after the second fight with Weidman. His record would've been 33-6.
![]()
I feel the right time was after the second Weidman fight because; the first fight with Weidman, when he initially lost the belt, he was playing around and got caught. Now I can only speak for myself but it felt like a flukey win for Weidman. I thought Silva could likely win the belt back if they had a rematch. Then the leg snapped and at his age a comeback from an injury like that was very slim in my opinion. So after that second loss, I knew it was over for Silva. He hadn't been Submitted or KO'd but rather a horrible injury was the culprit this time. If he left then, he could have chalked the 2nd loss up to an injury and hung his gloves up and a lot of people really wouldn't have had any qualms with it.After beating Stephen Bonnar, 17 fight win streak.
Just curious why many are selecting after the 2nd Weidman fight? What does Silva gain from losing twice to Weidman breaking his leg? Why not retire as a champion and still on top?
After the 2nd Chael fight would have been a movie quality send off.I know we got the magic of hindsight to guide us.
But I'd say after the second fight with Weidman, where he broke his leg. I think he should have retired after that.
Reason I say that, is because he was going to get an immediate rematch title shot after losing the Weidman the first time.
So it's reasonable to go for that rematch. But after that devastating loss with his leg break, he should have ended it there. He was never the same after.
I believe he was 37 years old if he retired right after the second fight with Weidman. His record would've been 33-6.
![]()