- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 37,365
- Reaction score
- 50,998
I know we got the magic of hindsight to guide us.
But I'd say after the second fight with Weidman, where he broke his leg. I think he should have retired after that.
Reason I say that, is because he was going to get an immediate rematch title shot after losing the Weidman the first time.
So it's reasonable to go for that rematch. But after that devastating loss with his leg break, he should have ended it there. He was never the same after.
I believe he was 37 years old if he retired right after the second fight with Weidman. His record would've been 33-6.
But I'd say after the second fight with Weidman, where he broke his leg. I think he should have retired after that.
Reason I say that, is because he was going to get an immediate rematch title shot after losing the Weidman the first time.
So it's reasonable to go for that rematch. But after that devastating loss with his leg break, he should have ended it there. He was never the same after.
I believe he was 37 years old if he retired right after the second fight with Weidman. His record would've been 33-6.

Last edited: