- Joined
- Jun 24, 2022
- Messages
- 2,436
- Reaction score
- 2,935
Okay, just to be clear, you think that an organization you're blasting for being corrupt was pushing around a very wealthy organization that is famous for its dishonesty and shady business practices. I think it's more reasonable to assume that the two shady businesses found a way to be corrupt together and neither one was being pushed around. (Also, don't forget the allegations in reverse, such as the time that the UFC was pushing them to ignore Conor's test results.)
Not that it completely negates the possibility of dishonesty and shady business practices but the UFC has been publicly owned since 2016, they are subject to many layers, the board of directors, stockholders, SEC, FTC, etc that hold them accountable to meet their obligation of conducting honest and fair business practices. USADA is a federally funded, non-government agency that has zero oversight and accountability.
It is not hard at all to find evidence of USADA dishonesty, it exists in your own post with your comment about Conor. Conor nor the UFC ever pushed to ignore drug tests as Tygart claimed. UFC had the contractually agreed upon option to waive the 6 month re-entry timeframe for a fighter at their discretion but they still had to pass two drug tests before they can fight which never happened anyway, but Tygart's statement showed he is either a blatant liar or blatantly incompetent or both. Which makes it pretty easy to understand why UFC did not feel USADA lived up to their expectations and chose to work with a different company this time.