- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 27,509
- Reaction score
- 23,580
Grandpa goes down.
The State's Attorney presented 1st degree to the Grand Jury, and that's what he got. So he did it to himself. And he is going to look stupid for it.If they charged him with first degree intentional, they're setting the prosecution up for the rope a dope. They'll never prove premeditation. He couldn't have possibly known "she's gonna call us and when we get there, I'm gonna shoot her"
Yeah I'd say potentially being blinded is serious injury. Not to mention burns. To use deadly force you need weapon, intent and delivery system. She technically had those. However you also need preclusion on the officers part. You're saying he had no other choice but to shoot that woman at that point in time? If the answer is no, charges are prudent. But not first degree murder.The State's Attorney presented 1st degree to the Grand Jury, and that's what he got. So he did it to himself. And he is going to look stupid for it.
In illinois in order to use deadly force to defend yourself you only need to be in danger of receiving serious injury. Anyone with half a brain understands a steaming liquid at close range can cause that. But we do have a couple knuckleheads here trying to minimize the danger of a steaming pot.
Tantrum time. Lol. So do you want to explain how she wasn't detained but subject to force I.D. while also being held at gunpoint? You making a scene then being a coward by taking cheap shots at the people who are dismantling you isn't helping your shit points that you ran away from.sports meme guy.....like eerily similar.
I never said that. That's just the way you chose to interpret what I actually did say, which was. "Bricks are a deadly weapon only within a limited range". You then twisted that whatever way you needed to in order to fit your agenda . I clarified that to you multiple times in tje largest font available.........you were still to damn dense for it to sink in. It's very similar to that other dipshit sports meme guy.....like eerily similar.
That's a completely indefensible position, and you are an idiot for saying it.
You missing 2 days of anger management doesn't give you permission to disregard policy Bird Brain.
I have reverance for all Human Life, including yours. I've lived on both sides of the proverbial Railroad Tracks. Sat on both sides of the Courtroom. My totality includes a sock footed, 6am been drinking all night, happy drunk shoplifter. A mean drunk would have been aggressive in every single frame of footage. I'd wager a non vegan meal his bac is .25 or higher.
Vargas is dead because the Shithead used excessive force Bird Brain. The threat to the 911 caller seems a bit overstated, but that's moot as far as the totality of circumstances at the time of the final confrontation. She was not in imminent danger at that time. 4 Cops and Vargas at that intersection.
You are talking stress and adrenaline like Vargas slinging lead like the LA Bank Shootout. It's a brick pussy. Me and 2 other seniors from the VFW would have put this dude on the ground with no weapons whatsoever. Just lol at being terrified of a guy with a brick. <Lmaoo>
2nd shot is low hanging fruit and I haven't addressed it much. It's clearly punitive rather than self protective. "I get excited" is an excuse I refuse to accept. You took an oath to remain calm in the face of danger. when you say "I do solemnly swear under oath or affirmation....." that's important, and people should be held accuntable to that oath.
You're saying he had no other choice but to shoot that woman at that point in time? If the answer is no, charges are prudent. But not first degree murder.
Yeah I'd say potentially being blinded is serious injury. Not to mention burns. To use deadly force you need weapon, intent and delivery system. She technically had those. However you also need preclusion on the officers part. You're saying he had no other choice but to shoot that woman at that point in time? If the answer is no, charges are prudent. But not first degree murder.
Sonya Massey did in fact held the pot above her head and possibly looks like she was trying to throw it.
The bodycam of Gratson has been released. This makes it from a slam dunk case to 50/50.
I personally think he's still guilty because he escalated for no reason and don't think he was at risk of great bodily harm.
"...may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person."
The officer was not in imminent danger IMO. But he will certainly argue that at trial.
The claims it might have been acid are retarded. Why in the world would any reasonable person believe she was boiling a pot of acid in the kitchen when they came in? She didn't invite them in the house and had no way of knowing they'd end up there. So she couldn't have premeditated that.
I think these questions matter in light of the other body cam.
Which came first the drawn deadly weapon pointed at somebody's head or the lifting of the pot?
Isn't putting your hands up a sign of surrendering? (Especially in the context of being scared apogizing and collapsing. )
Did they have tasers on them?
I would still think the cop was a giant piece of shit and should be charged. But the old lady would still be alive most likely and the charge wouldn't be murder. Still unfit to be a cop no question.
Its still the same concept of people thinking that an alleged limited elderly lady shouldn't be able to move in her own home or needs to do backflips over to cops and lick their boots on command. Like people don't panic or are terrified when 2 assholes with guns are in their home barking orders.
Somebody throwing their hands up and panicking is 100% a normal reaction to having a gun pulled on you. Just because they are cops doesn't change this universal reaction.
The bwc footage was all released at the same time. Graysons vantage point of the shooting is in the "police activity" video @Poon Goon posted itt. Some Sher Idiots just didnt have the attention span to process that entire 18 minute video....you included apparently.The bodycam of Gratson has been released. This makes it from a slam dunk case to 50/50
Him escalating for no reason and stating "I'm going to shoot you in the fucking face."
Only in your fantasy world is 36 considered elderly. You have to tone down this nonsensical hyperbole or no one is going to take you seriously.Its still the same concept of people thinking that an alleged limited elderly lady
Me guessing her age wrong doesn't have anything to do with you not understanding that she was being detained and held at gunpoint. Why can't you admit you were dead wrong there?Only in your fantasy world is 36 considered elderly. You have to tone down this nonsensical hyperbole or no one is going to take you seriously.
The prudes in the gay Olympic thread made me think of this story.
A cop tries to investigate librarians for having books in a library.
That's not him escalating. That's him fulfilling his statutory requirement to warn her prior to using lethal force. You may not like the language, but it does fulfill his requirement. Illinois does not have a de-escalation statute. So any chatter about Grayson escalating or failing to de-escalate is based on your ideals and emotions rather than Illinois Statute.
Thats the main point here. A police officer should never get to pull a deadly loaded weapon to your head and threaten to kill you in your own home for saying something....Especially when there was no crime being committed by the victim.She posed zero threat and all it took was a Jesus rebuke statement for him to go full retard.
There was literally no reason for him to escalate it to lethal force and drawing his gun.
Keep making excuses for retardation.
There was literally no reason for him to escalate it to lethal force and drawing his gun.