• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

What books are you reading?

Yell, Sam, If You Still Can
FUqLtr-XoAIHGW9

Just finished this brilliant new book (well, new translation) by Maylis Besserie. The original was published in France in 2020 and won “Goncourt du premier roman”, a prestigious French literary prize for first time novelists. This translation, by Clíona Ní Ríordáin, was only just published last month. I don’t tend to read much new fiction for some reason, but this caught my eye on the shelf.

Set during the last months of Samuel Beckett’s life in the Le Tiers-Temps retirement home in Paris, it provides a fictionalised account of his slow decay, as his body and mind begin to fail him. The narrative is an interior one, largely in the first person, consisting of a mesh of memories, musings and contemplation's. It moves between his current situation in the home, but also calls up the ghosts of his past - including James Joyce, and others. This interior voice is occasionally interspersed by the colder, dispassionate voices of and written reports by the various medics and care workers who are monitoring the ailing Beckett.

It’s written very well, albeit I can’t read French to compare the original. Naturally it’s a very tall order indeed to try and imagine the internal thoughts of someone as formidable as Beckett, but Besserie does a fine job. Thankfully there is no attempt to pastiche his writing style, but I think she manages to capture the existential concerns and dark wit that Beckett had. Essentially she succeeds in imagining Beckett transformed into one of his own characters. As Besserie puts it she “reconstructs a version of Beckett from real and imaginary facts, as if he were a character at the end of his life, like those who inhabit his own work”.

Had lined up Cormac McCarthys Suttree next, after recently finishing Blood Meridian, but after reading this I was in the notion to dip into some of Sam again.


Dream of Fair to Middling Women
jtmiDpI.jpg

So currently reading this one, which I had actually never heard of before. I’m about halfway through. It was Beckett’s first novel, written in a matter of weeks in 1932 when he was just twenty-six, and never published within his lifetime (other than a few fragments). It was rejected by publishers at the time and then simply shelved.

It is more clearly autobiographical than the other Beckett novels I have read. Our protagonist is a young man called Belacqua (an alter ego which also features in some of Beckett’s short stories), essentially being to Beckett what Stephen Dedalus was to Joyce, albeit without the distance of time. The back cover informed me that this was “very much a young man's book, drunk on its own cleverness and the author's formidable learning.”

Well by christ I would have to agree. It’s certainly a challenge for the old intellect, let's just say. When I can understand just what the hell is going on, I am enjoying the wonderfully rich writing style and the affected, almost unbelievably high-brow humour. It’s full of dense literary allusions, puns and a macaronic wit (hence why I tend to have google translate handy). Drunk on its own cleverness is right; if you ever want to get an acute sense of your own intellectual shortcomings this would be a fine place to start. Twenty-six year old Beckett is smarter than us and he definitely knows it.

In some ways it’s like reading some of the densest Dedalus sections of Ulysses; in its experimental style, nonlinear (almost nonexistent) plot and it’s profound rejection of literary realism it also hues close to Finnegans Wake (which I confess I have never gotten far with).

Yet nonetheless I haven’t stopped reading. My eyes glaze over certain passages with a combination of bewilderment, awe and humour (sometimes just bewilderment…), but there is definitely something enjoyable about it all the same. Particularly when certain passages do just click. Although it’s very high-brow, it doesn’t have the seriousness of Joyce’s Portrait of the Artist, or even Beckett’s later stuff. It’s wild and fun in a bawdy young man’s way, albeit filtered through a profoundly intellectual writing style.


Thank you for the lovely summary. I am keen on reading more Beckett, as I have only read a few of his plays, which were very good.

The past month or so, I have read:

H.O Mounce- Introduction to the Tractatus
Carlo Rovelli- "Helgoland"
Hans- Johann Glock- "What Is Analytic Philosophy?"

Reading Martin Heidegger's "What Is Called Thinking?" now.
 
91VPC0AyDiL.jpg

Great book almost done reading it. The book basically uses the life of Smedley Butler as guide through all the small interventions the US had between the Spanish American war and WW1.
Butler was almost like a Forest Gump like figure that was everywhere during that time period. From China, Haiti, Cuba , Philippines, Panama, Nicaragua, and Honduras. From propping dictatorships to overthrowing local governments. Later in life as he reflects on his military career he shows regrets for what he has done. He is later approached by powerful business men to help them in overthrowing the US government.

quote-i-served-in-all-commissioned-ranks-from-second-lieutenant-to-major-general-and-during-smedley-butler-76-80-15.jpg
 
A friend of mine just gave me these to read.

Started this one last night.
81R-ADdDatL.jpg


then he also gave me this.
71T834LGyHL.jpg
Ok I’m halfway through the JFK one and it’s starting to drag.

jake’s first trip through the portal was good. I couldn’t put the book down. But now he’s made his second trip through and it’s getting kind of boring. I care less about all the shit he’s doing in Dallas and his teaching career in Jodie etc etc.
 
Phenomena by Annie Jacobsen.

The secret history of the U.S. government’s investigations into extrasensory perception and psychokinesis.

Learning more about the intersection of privately funded ventures and those with government funding, during the height of the Cold War. The Stanford Research Institute, Uri Gellar, former astronaut Edgar Mitchell, exploring what we might know and what we don’t yet know about consciousness.
 
Thank you for the lovely summary. I am keen on reading more Beckett, as I have only read a few of his plays, which were very good.

The past month or so, I have read:

H.O Mounce- Introduction to the Tractatus
Carlo Rovelli- "Helgoland"
Hans- Johann Glock- "What Is Analytic Philosophy?"

Reading Martin Heidegger's "What Is Called Thinking?" now.

Are you enjoying the Heidegger book? That's one I haven't gotten around to reading but I like some of his other stuff. Jay Rorty is another author you might enjoy if you haven't yet read his writing.

Have you ever read any Mortimer Adler? Aristotle for Everyone and How to Read a Book are two that I loved. The latter, I tell people about it and they laugh and say 'I know how to read a book.' Of course that's not the point. What Adler discusses is approaching it like it's your favorite food. First look it over. Check out the index, the chapter headings, everything. One doesn't eat a great plate of food from left to right or with hesitation. Skip what you don't enjoy. For example with biographies I often speed read or skip the pages about the person's early life (he was raised on a farm his grandparents were from humble origins let's now talk for 50 pages about his great granparents) and go more toward the cool things they did later. I always have five or ten books lying around. Some dig in and consume in a few sittings. Others I savor like fine wine.
 
After a long break, I've gotten back to my favorite living author, Simon R. Green.

Just finished up the 10 (so far) Ishmael Jones mysteries, about to start something else by him, just not sure yet what. I still have to read Moonbreaker in the Secret History series, and then the Nightside/Secret History crossover final book Night Fall. I read the first 12 Nightside books years and years ago. Plus he's got the Gideon Sable Trilogy (so far) and a (also so far) stand-alone Jekyll & Hyde Inc. that is calling my name to dive into.
 
Dawnshard by sanderson. I sat on it for a minute. I am quite fond of sanderson's stories and Dawnshard was great. The Cosmere keeps getting better as it reveals itself. Im gonna jump back to gardens of the moon before the next mistborn book drops. I donated to the sanderson kickstarter so my 2023 reading is gonna be fairly full.
 
Are you enjoying the Heidegger book? That's one I haven't gotten around to reading but I like some of his other stuff. Jay Rorty is another author you might enjoy if you haven't yet read his writing.

Have you ever read any Mortimer Adler? Aristotle for Everyone and How to Read a Book are two that I loved. The latter, I tell people about it and they laugh and say 'I know how to read a book.' Of course that's not the point. What Adler discusses is approaching it like it's your favorite food. First look it over. Check out the index, the chapter headings, everything. One doesn't eat a great plate of food from left to right or with hesitation. Skip what you don't enjoy. For example with biographies I often speed read or skip the pages about the person's early life (he was raised on a farm his grandparents were from humble origins let's now talk for 50 pages about his great granparents) and go more toward the cool things they did later. I always have five or ten books lying around. Some dig in and consume in a few sittings. Others I savor like fine wine.

I haven't read any Adler, but I do hear his work periodically referenced.

Both of those sound potentially interesting. I'm quite fond of Aristotle's Poetics. Another surprising mark left by Aristotle was his theory of logic: functional enough until the 19th century, it wasn't until Gottlob Frege formalized logic as a mathematical discipline that logicians really stepped out of Aristotle's shadow. This enduring legacy is an interesting contrast to his physics, which already stacked up poorly against early modern approaches and imo is probably a reason for Aristotle's dismissal by people not interested in the history of science/philosophy.

As to the second book, I think that's always great to keep in mind. I'm constantly buying new books, so I need to be strategic with the tempo I set, relative to the material's difficulty. The essence of some points can be simple however prolix the language may seem, whereas other points may be too subtle to grasp at that time. I think skimming through a book is a very under-rated skill when you have a lot of unread books around. You get a sense for "corner-stone" sentences that occur and can generalize the writer's arguments a bit more coarsely. There's obviously no rule against going back and re-reading things more closely either. Perhaps most importantly, as you've suggested, you figure out what it is you want to read.

I put the Heidegger down to read a brief critical introduction on Paul De Man, and got into Eco's Theory of Semiotics afterwards. It's a transcription of a series of university lectures, so there's a rhetorical element that is more pronounced than in other writings. On the other hand, the teacher-student dynamic places the onus on him to present his ideas more transparently. If you're a fan of the Heidegger who focused on language rather than phenomenology after B&T, you might want to check it out. But personally, if you haven't already read it, I would say "Poetry, Language, Thought" is moreso what you're looking for.
 
Memory's Legion

Full collection of short stories in the Expanse universe. I hadn't read any of them so it was nice to get them in one collection.

There was one loose end in the series that I was bummed they didn't even bring up in finale, and I felt a little let down. The last story "The Sons of our Fathers", centered on the missing character and filled me with some much needed closure.

I feel a little sad the story is over now and there isn't any more planned in the universe. Such an awesome series, probably my favorite sci-fi series and will definitely read it again in a few years.
 
View attachment 932377Started this today. Book 2 in the series. So far so good. The 2nd and 3rd book are about 500pgs and are a little longer than book 1.

This was such a great series. The ending of the second book absolutely blew my mind. The puzzle pieces you are thrown don't make any sense trying to put them together, and when it all falls into place it's really amazing.
 
This was such a great series. The ending of the second book absolutely blew my mind. The puzzle pieces you are thrown don't make any sense trying to put them together, and when it all falls into place it's really amazing.
I took a break about halfway through book 3. It has become sort of a slog. I will finish it off soon though. The first 2 books were great. Such interesting concepts about alien life and how we would interact.
 
I started The Way of Kings on audible recently. I’m looking forward to it but also expect it to be a grind. Probably going to be reading up on some chapter recaps online for this one.
 
I took a break about halfway through book 3. It has become sort of a slog. I will finish it off soon though. The first 2 books were great. Such interesting concepts about alien life and how we would interact.

Yeah, they're really heavy sci-fi, told in almost "matter of fact" fashion, without much in character development. Reading them back to back can be a real chore.

With how much I enjoyed the series as a whole, the finale was a bit of a let down. With how meticulous the details were and crafting the puzzle throughout the series, the ending felt rushed.
 
Yeah, they're really heavy sci-fi, told in almost "matter of fact" fashion, without much in character development. Reading them back to back can be a real chore.

With how much I enjoyed the series as a whole, the finale was a bit of a let down. With how meticulous the details were and crafting the puzzle throughout the series, the ending felt rushed.
I tore though the first 2 in about a week, but I have been on the third for about a month. Just took a break to read other books. The series is long so no matter how you look at it, its a long haul. First 2 are worth a read if you like sci-fi.
 
Read "Gideon the Ninth" a few months ago. Had a couple slow points but on the all, really enjoyed it. Got around 2/3rds through, maybe a bit more of the sequel "Harrow the Ninth" and although the author was trying to build tension, I just didn't care for the alt universe type thing. I could expand, but I'm on the mobile and using that as a cop out.

Would recommend te first book though: Gideon the Ninth by Tamsyn Muir.
 
Back
Top