- Joined
- Nov 25, 2017
- Messages
- 4,889
- Reaction score
- 0
Isn't he great?
but he's the GOAT.
cheating is like....a detail he never really did.
Exactly.
With the exception of cheating multiple times with prohibited substances, and knowingly using illegal tactics during fights....Because he's a dirty rotten cheater and very arguably the most overrated fighter in UFC history.
The GOAT Anderson?
No way. You're like....a hater or something.
GSP beat Bisping. Easily his best win sadly <45>So, he qualifies for TS' question...
lol
Whittaker
Bisping was always under rated though.Bisping. Went from a journeyman to shocking the world by defeating Silva and Luke Rockhold, and becoming the middleweight champion of the world. Totally changed his legacy.
He lost to short notice Diaz in the usada era.Conor is the Only correct answer
Never failed.
Mendes, Aldo, Nate, Alvarez all under USADA testing
4-1 with 3 belts won under USADA testing (won interim title vs Mendes)
Alvarez is up there.
Then erased the loss and beat a full camp Nate In the rematch just 5 months later, and then became the the first-ever simultaneous 2 belt champ in UFC history, all under the USADA eraHe lost to short notice Diaz in the usada era.
Whittaker > Conor
Doesnt erase the loss when you got finished.Then erased the loss and beat a full camp Nate In the rematch just 5 months later, and then became the the first-ever simultaneous 2 belt champ in UFC history, all under the USADA era
4-1 under USADA testing with 3 belts and 3 wins across 3 different weight classes
DROP the hate. Be logical. Conor is the correct answer for #1
Whittaker is certainly is #2
Unlike you I can actually be objective and logicalDoesnt erase the loss when you got finished.
Whittaker is the best of the usada era.