What are the best fighters resume since USADA took over

but he's the GOAT.
cheating is like....a detail he never really did.

Exactly.

With the exception of cheating multiple times with prohibited substances, and knowingly using illegal tactics during fights....Because he's a dirty rotten cheater and very arguably the most overrated fighter in UFC history.
 
Exactly.

With the exception of cheating multiple times with prohibited substances, and knowingly using illegal tactics during fights....Because he's a dirty rotten cheater and very arguably the most overrated fighter in UFC history.

The GOAT Anderson?

No way. You're like....a hater or something.
 
The GOAT Anderson?

No way. You're like....a hater or something.

giphy.gif
 
Don't know about best resume, but Ronda got murked twice after USADA.
 
Bisping. Went from a journeyman to shocking the world by defeating Silva and Luke Rockhold, and becoming the middleweight champion of the world. Totally changed his legacy.
Bisping was always under rated though.
 
whittaker, max, tj and ferg
 
Whittaker and Conor
 
Conor is the Only correct answer

Never failed.

Mendes, Aldo, Nate, Alvarez all under USADA testing

4-1 with 3 belts won under USADA testing (won interim title vs Mendes)
He lost to short notice Diaz in the usada era.

Whittaker > Conor
 
He lost to short notice Diaz in the usada era.

Whittaker > Conor
Then erased the loss and beat a full camp Nate In the rematch just 5 months later, and then became the the first-ever simultaneous 2 belt champ in UFC history, all under the USADA era

4-1 under USADA testing with 3 belts and 3 wins across 3 different weight classes

DROP the hate. Be logical. Conor is the correct answer for #1

Whittaker is certainly is #2
 
Then erased the loss and beat a full camp Nate In the rematch just 5 months later, and then became the the first-ever simultaneous 2 belt champ in UFC history, all under the USADA era

4-1 under USADA testing with 3 belts and 3 wins across 3 different weight classes

DROP the hate. Be logical. Conor is the correct answer for #1

Whittaker is certainly is #2
Doesnt erase the loss when you got finished.

Whittaker is the best of the usada era.
 
Doesnt erase the loss when you got finished.

Whittaker is the best of the usada era.
Unlike you I can actually be objective and logical

Whittaker is definitely a good choice

For me it's Conor clear as day. Accomplished more while beating far superior fighters (the 1 loss makes it closer then it should be. Wins wise it's not even close)

It's Conor, Whittaker, and Holloway by far
 
Usada completely facilitating their presence and he now trains like an elite fighter plus he's in his prime now- Gegard #1 middleweight in world (though I really don't know how Bellator testing works )
 
Back
Top