- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 20,002
- Reaction score
- 11,856
Better do the family guy skin tone test...just to be safeIt's cool he's an Israeli
Better do the family guy skin tone test...just to be safeIt's cool he's an Israeli
Better do the family guy skin tone test...just to be safe
You haven't convinced me why a country needs a recession.
This is my theory on what's really happening. I'm not a yuge Trump supporter but I also don't believe he's a moron like other do.
1. The stock market is overvalued. The influx of retail traders has caused an everything bubble. Now every dumbass in the world thinks they need to buy the dip and never sell. This has caused too much market optimism. So we can either try to trigger a smaller market correction now, or wait until the problem is much worse and the bubble pops and causes the worst depression in history.
2. Inflation is stubborn. We printed too much money during COVID and raising interest rates has slowed inflation somewhat but we still need a recession to restore balance to the economy.
3. The trade deficit needs to shrink. Lots of people are arguing that a trade deficit is not a bad thing, but if it gets too big, that's a problem.
So what if Trump's advisors are trying to solve all 3 at once? We need a recession, but if they let it hit us naturally, it will be far worse, and it might come close to the next election and which would hurt the Republicans chances. So it's better for them to try and trigger the recession now, so we can recover before the next election, and they can take credit for the recovery.
It's a long explanation that I didn't feel like typing so I copied/pasted an AI response if you're genuinely curious:
Trump told his circle he lost the election to Biden and then purposely told his supporters to attack the White House , his supporters are actually more dangerous then him becbecause without them he couldn’t get away with breaking laws himself . Low IQ hostile people make up more then 65% of his supporters that’s a fact .1) You don't need a recession for the stock market to go down.
2) You don't need a recession to reduce inflation. Perhaps if you want actual deflation, but that would carry it's own baggage.
3) A recession would impact spending on domestic products the same as imported ones. Maybe even MORE. Lowering your GDP to lower the trade deficit is about one of the worst ideas ever.
There are any number of strategies one might advocate. And some of those might even cause recessionary pressure. But right now all that's happening is chaos and uncertainty are being injected into the market. Deliberately. There is no scenario where deliberately injecting chaos and uncertainty in the market is a healthy strategy.
This 90 day reprieve is also a terrible idea. Why? Because it prolongs uncertainty. How many large scale investment decisions do you think fortune 500 companies will make over the next 90 days? But hey.....this is what we voted for.........so I'll strap in and enjoy the ride. I'm an old rich white guy, so this is not going to bother me in the slightest.....But most everyone else is pretty much fucked.
Not convincedIt's a long explanation that I didn't feel like typing so I copied/pasted an AI response if you're genuinely curious:
"A country might need a recession to address imbalances in the economy, such as excessive debt, high inflation, or unsustainable growth, and to reset the economy after a period of unsustainable boom. Recessions, while painful, can also create opportunities for restructuring, innovation, and long-term economic improvement.
Here's a more detailed look:
Reasons for a Recession:
High Inflation:
When inflation gets out of control, central banks may raise interest rates to slow down the economy, potentially leading to a recession.
Excessive Debt:
High levels of debt in households, businesses, or the government can create a situation where it becomes difficult to sustain economic growth, potentially leading to a downturn.
Unsustainable Growth:
Rapid, unsustainable economic growth, often fueled by unsustainable spending or bubbles, can eventually lead to a crash and a recession.
Financial Market Instability:
Problems in the financial system, like banking crises or asset bubbles, can disrupt economic activity and trigger a recession.
External Shocks:
Events like a global recession, trade wars, or natural disasters can also negatively impact a country's economy and lead to a recession.
Policy-Induced Recessions:
Governments may deliberately choose to slow down the economy through fiscal or monetary policies to address imbalances, like controlling inflation.
Benefits of a Recession:
Debt Reduction:
Recessions can lead to a decline in borrowing and spending, which can help reduce debt levels in households and businesses.
Price Adjustments:
Recessions can allow for a reset of prices and wages, which can help to reduce inflation and create more sustainable economic conditions.
Innovation and Restructuring:
The economic hardship of a recession can force businesses to innovate and restructure, leading to more efficient and competitive industries in the long run.
Improved Resource Allocation:
Recessions can help to reallocate resources to more productive sectors of the economy.
Building a Foundation for Future Growth:
While recessions can be painful, they can also create a foundation for more sustainable and resilient economic growth in the future."
Trump told his circle he lost the election to Biden and then purposely told his supporters to attack the White House , his supporters are actually more dangerous then him becbecause without them he couldn’t get away with breaking laws himself . Low IQ hostile people make up more then 65% of his supporters that’s a fact .
The point is he has no plan he goes on emotional of a a very egotistical man, almost everyone that was a former administration member in his first term warned the public how dangerous he was and he still got elected and only because Musk spent 300 million on him and helped him out , his own former secretary of defense said he doesn’t believe in the constitution …….let that sink in ppl . Smh
The next few days will be interesting for the market
This is what mental illness looks like. He's created a new reality while subconsciously projecting his own shortcomings onto it.
"LOW IQ HOSTILE PEOPLE" is literally Deaths Head MO. Just go back and read some of his posts. You will have to decipher a lot of his rhetoric but it's always the same.
Some wild boast, like he beat Shaquel O'Neil at 365lbs armwrestling when he was 165lbs, or he beats up Klitchko sparring partners, or his family is in the mob. Call him on it and he will immediately tell you about his 7 KOs (no proof or video) and bet you $1k he can beat you up. He is literally the LOW IQ hostile person he accuses others of being.
I'm betting deaths head has 3 boosters shots, an alimony and child support check, and lives with a family member. When a male has this much TDS they have a fairly standard stereotype. Definately low frontal lobe development.
Definately low frontal lobe development.
There is no scenario where deliberately injecting chaos and uncertainty in the market is a healthy strategy.
I'm not disputing that, but certain relationships can be more beneficial for one party than the other while still being beneficial to both, especially on long timescales. America benefits enormously from Taiwanese microchips of course, but both Trump and Biden understood that it's not ideal to be the idle consumer of the relationship.It's a mutually beneficial trade and done on terms mutually agreed upon by both parties. Both sides win. Our trade deficit is due to us being a large rich country that likes to consume a lot.
Dude......Major disruptive actions happen ALL ON THEIR OWN. Uncertainty happens all on it's own. It's literally part of the system. It's not necessary or helpful (and is quite damaging in fact) for governments to go into epileptic fits and change tariffs hundreds of percent virtually on a daily basis.That is an insanely false statement. Injecting uncertainty is essentially a basic requirement for progress. The world advancement has not been defined by a gradual change of the status quo but major disruptive actions shattering the status quo.
Yes, there is an expected certainty of uncertainty built into the markets, but you are trying to deflect from the statement you made that I responded to directly referring to deliberate injection of uncertainty which is actually necessary and extremely helpful. No significant change will ever happen without deliberate actions that differ from the current norms which naturally create uncertainty.Dude......Major disruptive actions happen ALL ON THEIR OWN. Uncertainty happens all on it's own. It's literally part of the system. It's not necessary or helpful (and is quite damaging in fact) for governments to go into epileptic fits and change tariffs hundreds of percent virtually on a daily basis.
Anecdotal fallacy. It's true that your immediate conditions have some resilience to recessions, in that any downturn doesn't immediately deprive you of concrete things. But the difference between a decade-long recession and not is immense. Moreover, part of the reason you didn't experience a worsening was that the governments of the world immediately reacted to counteract the recession, preventing damage.I don't remember things getting worse than they were following 2008. And I lived in a somewhat dicy neighborhood during those years.