We have not discovered a single moon outside of our solar system.

[chill doggie]

What is really suspicious and extremely improbable about our moon are both it’s dimensions and distance relative to the Earth and the Sun, that in no way compare to any other moon in our solar system.
Look into it.

 

[dreden1982]

What is really suspicious and extremely improbable about our moon are both it’s dimensions and distance relative to the Earth and the Sun, that in no way compare to any other moon in our solar system.
Look into it.

Suspicious? I think we exist because of it.

 

[Langstarr]

If the moon was made out of spare ribs, would you eat it?

It’s a simple question! Would ya eat it?

I know I would. Heck, I’d have seconds, and then wash it down with a tall, cool Budweiser beer

 

[chill doggie]

Suspicious? I think we exist because of it.

400 times smaller than the sun but 400 times closer to earth than the sun.

Which makes them both appear to be the same size from the perspective of earth and gives way for the neat eclipses we experience, which could be said to be almost symbolic looking and have been perceived as such by certain ancient and contemporary cultures.

The probability of a moon to be right size and distance to appear the same size as the sun, as well as being a near perfect sphere is extremely low.

Also we don’t know how it came about, the status quo for everyone that is not directly investigating the origin of the moon scientifically is to just assume the Giant-impact Hypothesis is correct, but there is some evidence of the moon’s composition that contradicts that model, and predictions of certain results by such an impact that we don’t observe like a magma ocean. There is no coherent model that starts with the giant-impact event and follows the evolution of the debris into a single moon.

 

[PaddyO'malley]

Ah, my scholarly friend, let us dive deeper into this intriguing idea with some more thoughts, blending ancient village wisdom with modern theories.

So, in our village, we was been having discussions about this idea of a simulation. You know, like the whole world and universe is just a big computer game. This theory, it was make you think differently about everything, especially these exomoons.

Consider this: if we are indeed in a simulation, maybe these exomoons are not being rendered because we are too far away. In computer games, things far away often not appear until you get close. It's like saving memory or processing power. Maybe in this grand cosmic simulation, the same rule applies. Why we waste precious memory for render exomoons that nobody was have been close enough to see?

And with regards to the firmament, this was have could also fit quite great into the simulation theory. Maybe this firmament was been created like the edge of the game map, and the ice wall is a boundary in which other data was not been fully render on our gamescreen. What was been more, in many games, you cannot go past certain points; it's just the end of the world. What if our (simulation) world is designed a same way? Is space even (simulated) reality?

This idea of a simulation, it have also makes us question what's real and what's not. Like, are stars and planets just part of the background? Are exomoons just like those little details in games that only appear when necessary? It's all very curious and makes us wonder about the nature of our reality and human existing state.

So, my #MayberryFriend, when we consider exomoons, space, and even the shape of Earth, adding in this simulation angle opens up a whole new level of possibility. It's like our village stories, but with a modern twist. Are we seeing the whole picture, or just what the simulation wants us to see?

This kind of thinking, it's important. With #Satan and big government working together to #indoctrinate our people into lives of distraction and #SexualDeviancy, we need to keep our minds open and always be ready to think outside the box, even if it's a simulated box. Who knows what truths we might uncover? The universe is a mysterious place, full of wonders and possibly, just possibly, a grand simulation.


Stay awake.

#JustMyCents

 

[ferrisjso]

What is really suspicious and extremely improbable about our moon are both it’s dimensions and distance relative to the Earth and the Sun, that in no way compare to any other moon in our solar system.
Look into it.

Well the Moon was formed from a crash between Earth and another planet, Theia(which was similar in size to Mars). That is why the Earths moon is so unusual.

 

[chill doggie]

Well the Moon was formed from a crash between Earth and another planet, Theia(which was similar in size to Mars). That is why the Earths moon is so unusual.

That’s just a hypothesis, weaker than an actual theory.

• The presence of volatiles such as water trapped in lunar basalts and carbon emissions from the lunar surface is more difficult to explain if the Moon was caused by a high-temperature impact.[46][47]
• The iron oxide (FeO) content (13%) of the Moon, intermediate between that of Mars (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%), rules out most of the source of the proto-lunar material from Earth's mantle.[48]
• If the bulk of the proto-lunar material had come from an impactor, the Moon should be enriched in siderophilic elements, when, in fact, it is deficient in them.[49]
• The Moon's oxygen isotopic ratios are essentially identical to those of Earth.[6] Oxygen isotopic ratios, which may be measured very precisely, yield a unique and distinct signature for each Solar System body.[50] If a separate proto-planet Theia had existed, it probably would have had a different oxygen isotopic signature than Earth, as would the ejected mixed material.[51]
• The Moon's titanium isotope ratio (50Ti/47Ti) appears so close to Earth's (within 4 ppm), that little if any of the colliding body's mass could likely have been part of the Moon.[52][53]

 

[Phlog]

They are very very small and space is very very big.

 

[THEfightsAREfixed]

most if not all moons are made out of cheese and get eaten by space rats before they can begin to advertise themselves on the galactic market

 

[jeff7b9]

Ok I was off by ONE year. Sue me.

First exoplanet was confirmed in 1992. UFC 1 was in 1993.

You will be hearing from my lawyer.

I keep him on retainer just in case I run into a situation such as this.

 

[Belaya Smert]

Voyager 1 can’t work like this.

 

[HARRISON_3]

Exoplanets as a concept are younger than the UFC.

Lol @ comparing exoplanets to the Ultimate Fighting Challenge

 

[Crawler89]

400 times smaller than the sun but 400 times closer to earth than the sun.

Which makes them both appear to be the same size from the perspective of earth and gives way for the neat eclipses we experience, which could be said to be almost symbolic looking and have been perceived as such by certain ancient and contemporary cultures.

The probability of a moon to be right size and distance to appear the same size as the sun, as well as being a near perfect sphere is extremely low.

Also we don’t know how it came about, the status quo for everyone that is not directly investigating the origin of the moon scientifically is to just assume the Giant-impact Hypothesis is correct, but there is some evidence of the moon’s composition that contradicts that model, and predictions of certain results by such an impact that we don’t observe like a magma ocean. There is no coherent model that starts with the giant-impact event and follows the evolution of the debris into a single moon.

Whilst alot of what you say is current and such, one thing I never see talked about by anyone posting these things and how it's perfect for eclipses, is that one day it won't be. It's moving away from us, though slowly.

There was a time when the eclipses were not perfect also due to this.

Moons a space ship. Nanobot swarms inside. Moonfall was real.

 

[Wetarmpits]

One fact that really drives home how primitive we are as a species right now is that we have not discovered a single moon outside of our solar system. Really puts into perspective how little we know about exoplanets when we are incapable of discovering a single exomoon. We know those moons exist probability wise we are just incapable of detecting them.

Exoplanets as a concept are younger than the UFC. Yet some are talking about traveling to them when we just gained the ability to confirm their existence.

If that is one outstanding fact about how stupid we are as a species you probably should look more on this planet and less in the sky.

 

[Jack Reacheround]

I'm pretty sure exoplanets were a CONCEPT long before 1992.

They were something most scientists assumed existed, but not actually confirmed until then.

 

[Wilmer Digreux]

youranus is a moon

 

[StonedLemur]

We murder children because of their skin pigmentation or because of where their parents choose to worship. We spend billions on pet projects of politicians while some of our children go to bed hungry or sleep in cardboard boxes and this is the one fact that really drives home how primitive we are as a species?

Very well said sir, we see eye to eye, but we knew that already.

 

[GuanoApes]

Researchers Find Moon in Another Solar System

For only the second time, researchers have found what appears to be a moon orbiting a planet in another solar system. Just like the first time, this one has qualities that suggest such moons may differ greatly from those in our solar system.

learningenglish.voanews.com

 

[Jack Reacheround]

Researchers Find Moon in Another Solar System

For only the second time, researchers have found what appears to be a moon orbiting a planet in another solar system. Just like the first time, this one has qualities that suggest such moons may differ greatly from those in our solar system.

learningenglish.voanews.com

Nope. Fake news. That’s the mainstream media just covering up for Big Telescope, a multi-hundred dollar industry a year.

 

[Plutoburn]

We've made a lot of progress discovering exoplanets in the last 2 decades though.