- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 10,458
- Reaction score
- 169
agreed. it was better
So the decision should have gone to Spinks? Anybody think we need a rematch here?
NO VERNO RETIRE ON TOP and it would be cool if he did.Verno was the guy that always just fell short in big fights.So the decision should have gone to Spinks? Anybody think we need a rematch here?
It wasn't an overly exciting fight...but probably Cory's most exciting he's ever had. It got interesting after the 6th where Verno started to land more and lured Cory into fighting with him on the inside instead of falling for the "I'll swing wildly and eat 5 punches from the outside" schtick. The decision was questionable but I don't see a rematch going any differently, the only difference being the judges might give it to Spinks.
Frankly I was shocked they gave it to Verno based solely on the fact they were in Cory's backyard. I thought "Jeez, verno's gonna have to knock him out to win, because no way is a close decision going his way in St. Louis" but wow I am very surprised.
At no point was Verno hurt, or even close to it, whereas Spinks was taking some big punches at times...so I dunno. Very subjective decision in that regard...there's 2 ideologies conflicting there as to how you score a fight. I don't want a rematch though.
sorry double postSo the decision should have gone to Spinks? Anybody think we need a rematch here?
NO VERNO RETIRE ON TOP and it would be cool if he did.Verno was the guy that always just fell short in big fights.
Thanks for the info. I, too, was surprised that Phillips won a decision in Spinks' hometown. Like you said, it sounds like the judges preferred Phillips' style to that of Spinks.
totaly,most of the time you see fighters keep on fighting when clearly its not in their best interest,in vernos case whats the point ? he is not gonna get another big win like that.if he still keeps fighting I would get a match with a semi big name for money OUMA springs to mind,why not mayorga ?Nothing wrong with going out on top......
And it's a trend I'm seeing more nowadays. Time was, pepper-punching slick boxers could pretty much count on a wide UD over guys with the style of say Phillips, who throw wild and land more rarely but with more pop. Now, I'm seing more of a Pride-FC style scoring shift where guys who "come closer to finishing" are rewarded, as the focus is more and more on HOW you win in addition to IF you win. Verno was looking for the KO all night long whereas you could obviously tell Spinks was just trying to take it deep and outlast him. Two of the judges agreed that the guy who was looking for the KO and came closer to it when he DID land should get the close rounds. It's an intriguing shift in the way boxing is scored. It's tough to take a side on it because on one hand, I like seeing workrate rewarded, and I like guys who really do WANT to finish fights. On the other hand, I feel like guys with low power but slick skills are not getting the proper respect from the fans or commentators/judges.
The title of this thread was a relief... because it's getting way too expensive being a die hard cory spinks fan, paying $50 every time to see him fight....