• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Was Your Thread Deleted, Moved or Merged? Ask about it here

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wish you guys would just tell us when you murder one of our threads so we don't spend time looking for it only to find out it's gone :/
 
You should just be grateful you didn't get dubs. Fight fixing allegations or suggestions, even in "joke" form, are serious business.
 
Thread "http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/dan-henderson-threads-deleted.3262173/page-2" was locked, that one was opened to follow up on my other thread that got deleted : "Classless Hendo at it again", cant recall the exact title, and dont have the original URL at hand, why? I posted on another thread regarding the same topic, that got deleted right after, so i opened the one that got locked.
 
Thread "http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/dan-henderson-threads-deleted.3262173/page-2" was locked, that one was opened to follow up on my other thread that got deleted : "Classless Hendo at it again", cant recall the exact title, and dont have the original URL at hand, why? I posted on another thread regarding the same topic, that got deleted right after, so i opened the one that got locked.
Deleted it because the thread has been done countless times, especially in the aftermath of UFC 199. Hendo throws strikes until the ref intervenes, there's nothing to discuss.
 
Alright. This is concerning the recent
deleted comment in the "Mark Hunt
fanboys" thread in the heavies.

Keep in mind, I resorted to putting it on
blast amongst other posters because
the last time I tried directly (with the mod
& here, in support)-
I got banned for a week(ish)

I'm not looking to get banned again
for some bullshit. So hopefully one of
you dudes could help me out with
figuring out what exactly gets a thread
deleted vs sending a thread to the
dump or wasteland? My second most
recent thread creation was titled
"BROCK v USADA" It was the first
thread of it's kind, from what I could tell,
as the news was still fresh & most
posters were posting threads, inquiring
about his possible first opponent as
opposed to the obvious conundrum of
a USADA loophole for retired fighters

There were implications, naturally,
of steroid abuse simply due to the
fighter in question & the organization
that he would undoubtedly (or doubtedly)
would have to face. I believe it was a
discussion worth having, and considering
the amount of USADA exemption threads
& Brock 300lb threads going around
(not to mention the weirdo in the heavies
spamming Mark Hunt hate threads)...
It's certainly a discussion that shouldn't
be singled out & repressed.

So again, without trying to sound like
an asshole, yet being adamant about
the fact that I don't like to be censored
when I'm not bashing or outright accusing
fighters of steroid use... why did that thread
get straight up deleted as opposed to
wastelanded or dumped? There was good
discussion in that thread. Someone even
referenced the specific USADA loophole
that wasn't mentioned until a day later
on the boards.

What's up with it doggies?
 
Shit, forgot about the top sticky thread.
My bad dudes. Feel free to move there.
 
Alright. This is concerning the recent
deleted comment in the "Mark Hunt
fanboys" thread in the heavies.

Keep in mind, I resorted to putting it on
blast amongst other posters because
the last time I tried directly (with the mod
& here, in support)-
I got banned for a week(ish)

I'm not looking to get banned again
for some bullshit. So hopefully one of
you dudes could help me out with
figuring out what exactly gets a thread
deleted vs sending a thread to the
dump or wasteland? My second most
recent thread creation was titled
"BROCK v USADA" It was the first
thread of it's kind, from what I could tell,
as the news was still fresh & most
posters were posting threads, inquiring
about his possible first opponent as
opposed to the obvious conundrum of
a USADA loophole for retired fighters

There were implications, naturally,
of steroid abuse simply due to the
fighter in question & the organization
that he would undoubtedly (or doubtedly)
would have to face. I believe it was a
discussion worth having, and considering
the amount of USADA exemption threads
& Brock 300lb threads going around
(not to mention the weirdo in the heavies
spamming Mark Hunt hate threads)...
It's certainly a discussion that shouldn't
be singled out & repressed.

So again, without trying to sound like
an asshole, yet being adamant about
the fact that I don't like to be censored
when I'm not bashing or outright accusing
fighters of steroid use... why did that thread
get straight up deleted as opposed to
wastelanded or dumped? There was good
discussion in that thread. Someone even
referenced the specific USADA loophole
that wasn't mentioned until a day later
on the boards.

What's up with it doggies?

Why do you keep asking questions you know the answers to? Youve been told why your comments are deleted and/or moved on several occasions.

Your threads and comments get deleted because you keep making stupid ones. Like this for example.

What's Brock t/e ratio?


Probably that...

Anything else or should I just toss you another infraction for that one above?
 
Why do you keep asking questions you know the answers to? Youve been told why your comments are deleted and/or moved on several occasions.

Your threads and comments get deleted because you keep making stupid ones. Like this for example.



Anything else or should I just toss you another infraction for that one above?
If I was told why my thread was
deleted... I wouldn't be in here inquiring.
I also wouldn't inquire about it if a mod
didn't suggest it.

The t/e ratio is what is in question.
NO ONE knows it. It may very well
be normal. & If it's normal...
my excitement level would be equal
to normal. it was a post that was a
real answer to the OP.

I obviously don't want more infractions.
Hence, coming here to support.. with
respectful inquiries.
 
Alright. This is concerning the recent
deleted comment in the "Mark Hunt
fanboys" thread in the heavies.

Keep in mind, I resorted to putting it on
blast amongst other posters because
the last time I tried directly (with the mod
& here, in support)-
I got banned for a week(ish)

I'm not looking to get banned again
for some bullshit. So hopefully one of
you dudes could help me out with
figuring out what exactly gets a thread
deleted vs sending a thread to the
dump or wasteland? My second most
recent thread creation was titled
"BROCK v USADA" It was the first
thread of it's kind, from what I could tell,
as the news was still fresh & most
posters were posting threads, inquiring
about his possible first opponent as
opposed to the obvious conundrum of
a USADA loophole for retired fighters

There were implications, naturally,
of steroid abuse simply due to the
fighter in question & the organization
that he would undoubtedly (or doubtedly)
would have to face. I believe it was a
discussion worth having, and considering
the amount of USADA exemption threads
& Brock 300lb threads going around
(not to mention the weirdo in the heavies
spamming Mark Hunt hate threads)...
It's certainly a discussion that shouldn't
be singled out & repressed.

So again, without trying to sound like
an asshole, yet being adamant about
the fact that I don't like to be censored
when I'm not bashing or outright accusing
fighters of steroid use... why did that thread
get straight up deleted as opposed to
wastelanded or dumped? There was good
discussion in that thread. Someone even
referenced the specific USADA loophole
that wasn't mentioned until a day later
on the boards.

What's up with it doggies?

A thread moved to the Wasteland can be for several reasons:

It's a redundant thread, is a fantasy match up, joke thread, or is a chat thread.

With deleted threads, a lot of times you'll get a thread that isn't breaking any rules but the comments made after derail the thread and have it lead to PED accusations. And with certain threads it's inevitable that it'll head that way. Instead of dubbing several posters the thread is usually deleted instead. Same goes for hottest fighter threads. They aren't against the rules but it always heads towards graphic sexual posting.
 
A thread moved to the Wasteland can be for several reasons:

It's a redundant thread, is a fantasy match up, joke thread, or is a chat thread.

With deleted threads, a lot of times you'll get a thread that isn't breaking any rules but the comments made after derail the thread and have it lead to PED accusations. And with certain threads it's inevitable that it'll head that way. Instead of dubbing several posters the thread is usually deleted instead. Same goes for hottest fighter threads. They aren't against the rules but it always heads towards graphic sexual posting.
Thank you lethal.
I appreciate that. & clears things up.

I can't control what other posters
post in my thread. So it kind of sucks
for that reason. Would be cool to have
an option to lock the thread & hide it
&have it only be visible to thread starter
& mods. Even if simply for content. As
I had some good gifs in there. lol
 
No problem.

Lol, not sure if that exists for Xenforo but that would definitely be useful.
 
Aside from being biased why exactly it deleted? The only flaming going on was from people coming in saying the music sucks in thread that was about about a musician who died. Yet I said "lol" in another thread and a storm ensues but people come to my thread to say "I don't like black metal it sucks" and or some reason it's allowed how exactly is that allowed but me saying lol isnt allowed.

I demand answers IN MEMORY OF AVAEJEE
 
Sounds like it was a shitstorm. I wasn't in the thread so I don't know.
 
Sounds like it was a shitstorm. I wasn't in the thread so I don't know.

It's just baffling that I said Lol in a thread where another musician died and I get a warning but people came to my thread saying "black metal is shit" and that's literally the only thing they said and its tolerated

Biased much?
 
I remember that thread...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top