Deleted it because the thread has been done countless times, especially in the aftermath of UFC 199. Hendo throws strikes until the ref intervenes, there's nothing to discuss.Thread "http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/dan-henderson-threads-deleted.3262173/page-2" was locked, that one was opened to follow up on my other thread that got deleted : "Classless Hendo at it again", cant recall the exact title, and dont have the original URL at hand, why? I posted on another thread regarding the same topic, that got deleted right after, so i opened the one that got locked.
Alright. This is concerning the recent
deleted comment in the "Mark Hunt
fanboys" thread in the heavies.
Keep in mind, I resorted to putting it on
blast amongst other posters because
the last time I tried directly (with the mod
& here, in support)-
I got banned for a week(ish)
I'm not looking to get banned again
for some bullshit. So hopefully one of
you dudes could help me out with
figuring out what exactly gets a thread
deleted vs sending a thread to the
dump or wasteland? My second most
recent thread creation was titled
"BROCK v USADA" It was the first
thread of it's kind, from what I could tell,
as the news was still fresh & most
posters were posting threads, inquiring
about his possible first opponent as
opposed to the obvious conundrum of
a USADA loophole for retired fighters
There were implications, naturally,
of steroid abuse simply due to the
fighter in question & the organization
that he would undoubtedly (or doubtedly)
would have to face. I believe it was a
discussion worth having, and considering
the amount of USADA exemption threads
& Brock 300lb threads going around
(not to mention the weirdo in the heavies
spamming Mark Hunt hate threads)...
It's certainly a discussion that shouldn't
be singled out & repressed.
So again, without trying to sound like
an asshole, yet being adamant about
the fact that I don't like to be censored
when I'm not bashing or outright accusing
fighters of steroid use... why did that thread
get straight up deleted as opposed to
wastelanded or dumped? There was good
discussion in that thread. Someone even
referenced the specific USADA loophole
that wasn't mentioned until a day later
on the boards.
What's up with it doggies?
What's Brock t/e ratio?
Probably that...
If I was told why my thread wasWhy do you keep asking questions you know the answers to? Youve been told why your comments are deleted and/or moved on several occasions.
Your threads and comments get deleted because you keep making stupid ones. Like this for example.
Anything else or should I just toss you another infraction for that one above?
Alright. This is concerning the recent
deleted comment in the "Mark Hunt
fanboys" thread in the heavies.
Keep in mind, I resorted to putting it on
blast amongst other posters because
the last time I tried directly (with the mod
& here, in support)-
I got banned for a week(ish)
I'm not looking to get banned again
for some bullshit. So hopefully one of
you dudes could help me out with
figuring out what exactly gets a thread
deleted vs sending a thread to the
dump or wasteland? My second most
recent thread creation was titled
"BROCK v USADA" It was the first
thread of it's kind, from what I could tell,
as the news was still fresh & most
posters were posting threads, inquiring
about his possible first opponent as
opposed to the obvious conundrum of
a USADA loophole for retired fighters
There were implications, naturally,
of steroid abuse simply due to the
fighter in question & the organization
that he would undoubtedly (or doubtedly)
would have to face. I believe it was a
discussion worth having, and considering
the amount of USADA exemption threads
& Brock 300lb threads going around
(not to mention the weirdo in the heavies
spamming Mark Hunt hate threads)...
It's certainly a discussion that shouldn't
be singled out & repressed.
So again, without trying to sound like
an asshole, yet being adamant about
the fact that I don't like to be censored
when I'm not bashing or outright accusing
fighters of steroid use... why did that thread
get straight up deleted as opposed to
wastelanded or dumped? There was good
discussion in that thread. Someone even
referenced the specific USADA loophole
that wasn't mentioned until a day later
on the boards.
What's up with it doggies?
Thank you lethal.A thread moved to the Wasteland can be for several reasons:
It's a redundant thread, is a fantasy match up, joke thread, or is a chat thread.
With deleted threads, a lot of times you'll get a thread that isn't breaking any rules but the comments made after derail the thread and have it lead to PED accusations. And with certain threads it's inevitable that it'll head that way. Instead of dubbing several posters the thread is usually deleted instead. Same goes for hottest fighter threads. They aren't against the rules but it always heads towards graphic sexual posting.
Switch to geocities imoNo problem.
Lol, not sure if that exists for Xenforo but that would definitely be useful.
Sounds like it was a shitstorm. I wasn't in the thread so I don't know.
Sounds like it was a shitstorm. I wasn't in the thread so I don't know.
Reports about bad ads should include the following:
1. Location/Country
2. Device
3. Browser
4. Company/Product of ad
5. A screenshot if possible
6. Brief description of how the ad is a problem
7. Page/Pages affected8. Date and time of occurrence
Refer to the instructions for your device on how to take screenshots