- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 7,723
- Reaction score
- 9,703
She obviously wasn't "dominating," but she was winning. Grasso won the first, and Shevchnenko won the 2nd and 3rd. Shevchenko was winning, but it was a competitive fight.
I don't even think she had to be that humble, but saying she was dominating until she made a single mistake was super condescending for no reason. She keeps repeating it too, so she obviously feels this way. And as many have pointed out to me, Val has even been arrogant in wins. She needs to chill and remember that they gifted her a division after going 0-2 against Nunes.It was a fairly close fight with plenty of time left. She wasn't "dominating" as much as Adesanya was against Pereira and we saw how that panned out. Let alone Chael vs. Anderson I.
She basically turned into a wrestler and didn't seem close to finishing or causing damage. Unless you can hold her down for 25 minutes and not tire it's hard to just rely on that to win fights. Grasso was winning the standup.
I also don't understand how fighters still don't grasp anything to do with PR and what the fans say about them. All Schev should say is that it was a close fight up until the finish, Grasso was the better fighter, but she thinks she deserves a rematch and that the next fight will be different.
Valentina seems to think so. She said it post fight and doubled down on this IG post from a few hours ago.
I don't, to me it seemed like Grasso adjusted to everything Valentina did and she got frustrated. What do the sherbros think? Discuss.
For sure I'm not saying she wasn't up (or at worst 2-2) , but dominating?at the pace, judges would have easily given her the decision.
No, she did exactly what she complained that Santos did to her. She got outstruck and then held on for her life to try to steal rounds. If she survived that choke it would have been 2-2 going into the 5th with Grasso being much fresher.