War Room Lounge v86: Just ensure they don't accidentally 'ban' you

Status
Not open for further replies.
tonni said:
An honorable personality is awesome also
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
Gregolian said:
You must follow 4x4barbie on Instagram then.
Click to expand...
Actually, no idea who that is.

I also don't follow anybody on any gram. My wife does, though, Buncha yoga chicks and stuff, some of whom aren't bad either.
 
sickc0d3r said:
Actually, no idea who that is.

I also don't follow anybody on any gram. My wife does, though, Buncha yoga chicks and stuff, some of whom aren't bad either.
Click to expand...


She's basically your pure stereotypical southern "I worked for everything on my SEMA truck" just ignoring she has a black credit card cause of daddy.

Needs to listen to that country song about not using dad's credit card un-ironically.

*lol... her SEMA truck is running a Rough Country lift. That's like going to a fashion show wearing some Burlington Coat Factory suit.
 
Mendacious said:
Well I technically was not recently banned, my last account here was probably 2-3 years ago.

Sherdog doesn’t care anymore probably because mods are better and because the site is declining. It feels like every thread I go to no matter what sub forum I’m seeing the same motherfuckers. I don’t recall it being like that 10 years ago.
Click to expand...

What was your old username?
 
LiquidityTrap said:
@HockeyBjj


Yeah, Nate Silver and Jack V Savage have been very skeptical of Bloomberg's ability to become a major player in this race. They didn't grasp the scale of the operation Bloomberg is running here. In Jack's case, he underestimates the power of money in determining election outcomes.
Click to expand...
Money only helps when you have a decent product.
Besides that, Bloomberg's strategy atm is to bet it all on Super Tuesday. That has NEVER worked for any candidate that's tried it.
I would have bet you dollars to plums on Bloomberg's electability prior to your ban.
 
Money only helps when you have a decent product.
Besides that, Bloomberg's strategy atm is to bet it all on Super Tuesday. That has NEVER worked for any candidate that's tried it.
I would have bet you dollars to plums on Bloomberg's electability prior to your ban.
Click to expand...


Electability? Are you a fool? I wrote explicitly that Bloomberg has no chance of winning. Nuance is not your strong suit, Mr. Hig.
 
Gregolian said:


She's basically your pure stereotypical southern "I worked for everything on my SEMA truck" just ignoring she has a black credit card cause of daddy.

Needs to listen to that country song about not using dad's credit card un-ironically.

*lol... her SEMA truck is running a Rough Country lift. That's like going to a fashion show wearing some Burlington Coat Factory suit.
Click to expand...

[<cena1}
I don't know much about the lift kit, but that truck seemed pretty baddass. And I'd definitely ride to the tractor pull or rodeo or whatever with her, even though she wasn't wearing a ball cap.
 
tonni said:
I don't get people who say women aren't funny, that's virgin talk imo. I'm not talking about stand-up comedians, just women in general.
Click to expand...
Speaking strictly of comedians though and you know it.
 
sickc0d3r said:
[<cena1}
I don't know much about the lift kit, but that truck seemed pretty baddass. And I'd definitely ride to the tractor pull or rodeo or whatever with her, even though she wasn't wearing a ball cap.
Click to expand...


SEMA trucks are generally only good for shows. Low pro tires stretched over rims too big for them and shit. It's an engineering show to show off new rim styles and lift kits and shit.
 
SIRGAY HARITONOB! said:
Speaking strictly of comedians though and you know it.
Click to expand...

Just be honest though.

A woman comedian has made you laugh in the past you're just too stubborn to admit it because it's just some popular thing people say that women comedians aren't funny.
 
LiquidityTrap said:
Electability? Are you a fool? I wrote explicitly that Bloomberg has no chance of winning. Nuance is not your strong suit, Mr. Hig.
Click to expand...
Maybe this is Poe's law at work, but I'm trying to figure out how your previous post was supposed to indicate what you are claiming it does now.
 
@Higus

Mr. Hig, this is very simple. My consistent claim has been that those who predicted Bloomberg to never reach substantial national polling levels were wrong. I tried to bet repeatedly with Mr. vag on this point, but he was slippery. As before, I fully expect that Bloomberg's national polling average will exceed 6%. A month ago, that view was very rare. Suddenly people are waking up.
 
LiquidityTrap said:
@Higus

Mr. Hig, this is very simple. My consistent claim has been that those who predicted Bloomberg to never reach substantial national polling levels were wrong. I tried to bet repeatedly with Mr. vag on this point, but he was slippery. As before, I fully expect that Bloomberg's national polling average will exceed 6%. A month ago, that view was very rare. Suddenly people are waking up.
Click to expand...

Do you want to bet on it reaching 8%?
 
@Jack V Savage

Do you want to bet on it reaching 8%?
Click to expand...

Just yesterday you were considering taking the bet at 6%. Less than 24 hours later you bump it up to 8%. Looks like you might be changing your evaluation of Bloomberg's ceiling.
 
LiquidityTrap said:
@Jack V Savage

Just yesterday you were considering taking the bet at 6%. Less than 24 hours later you bump it up to 8%. Looks like you might be changing your evaluation of Bloomberg's ceiling.
Click to expand...

My initial offer was 8%, based on your comments. Then you backed off and asked me if I'd take 7%, and I said maybe. Then you said that you might prefer 6%. If you're not even confident that he'll hit 8%, what are you saying, exactly?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,016
Messages
57,961,429
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top