War Room Lounge v78: Figure someone will make a thread eventually.

[HereticBD]

@Lead , I understand, and thanks for getting back to me- TJ

Oh', you're definitely Ripskater...or the DDL of Ripskater impersonators.

 

[waiguoren]

This isn't a matter of interpretation; it's you insisting and maybe really believing that something that we both saw happen didn't happen.

What is that "something"?

I think your choice to lie about Clinton's comment was different.

What was the "lie"? That the terms "agent" and "asset" and "source" are all equivalent in HUMINT?

It's not me that is mad, despite perfect evidence of my anger

Where is this so-called "perfect evidence"?

 

[Jesus H. Sherdog]

Current mood

 

[Deleted member 539235]

look, it's obvious that trump made fun of that reporter

also, it's obvious that hillary said stein was also (as well as gabbard) a russian asset. asset and agent are interchangeable.

you're both wrong, so please do us all a favour and

 

[Sycho Sid]

look, it's obvious that trump made fun of that reporter

also, it's obvious that hillary said stein was also (as well as gabbard) a russian asset. asset and agent are interchangeable.

you're both wrong, so please do us all a favour and

Asset and agent are not interchangeable

 

[Fawlty]

Where is this so-called "perfect evidence"?

It's not about evidence, it's about domination.

 

[waiguoren]

it's obvious that trump made fun of that reporter

Mr. Jack and I agree on that.

it's obvious that hillary said stein was also (as well as gabbard) a russian asset.

I'm agnostic on that. Mr Jack says HRC did not include Gabbard with that "also".

asset and agent are interchangeable.

I agree with you. Mr. Jack disagrees.

you're both wrong

It seems your disagreements are with Mr. Jack, not me.

It's not about evidence, it's about domination.

Well, then you're failing.

 

[Deleted member 539235]

Asset and agent are not interchangeable

 

[PolishHeadlock2]

Interesting timing

 

[senri]

Only my wife is privy to that knowledge, though I believe you can likely guess given my personality.

 

[Rational Poster]

Interesting timing

I mean is it really surprising that someone who worked for the President has close ties to right wing propaganda news outlets?

 

[Limbo Pete]

What is that "something"?

What was the "lie"? That the terms "agent" and "asset" and "source" are all equivalent in HUMINT?

Where is this so-called "perfect evidence"?

 

[Sketch]

 

[HereticBD]

That's silly. A pillow can't take any vows.

 

[Lead]

Strange, I thought the F word was already censored, so I'm not sure why they needed a mod intervention.

This may seem confusing but the word filter isn’t in place to allow people to use those censored words without any trouble. If you use a censored word, it can still get you infractions. The filter only blocks it out visually but it does show up in outside search results. The filter is just to temporarily avoid the word being shown until a moderator acts on the post. My best suggestion is if you post something and shows up, you quickly edit out that word.

 

[HereticBD]

This may seem confusing but the word filter isn’t in place to allow people to use those censored words without any trouble. If you use a censored word, it can still get you infractions.

Believe that, fellow Sherdoggies.

My advice is that is if you're not entirely sure, just use the old asterisks to censor yourself..

 

[Lead]

Believe that, fellow Sherdoggies.

My advice is that is if you're not entirely sure, just use the old asterisks.

Even that isn’t full proof. If you see it get censored, I just wouldn’t say it. Sometimes there’s leniance when a topic is about the word itself or something like that but it’s still risky imo to do.

 

[Graves The Elder]

always entertaining.
what did I miss?

 

[HereticBD]

Even that isn’t full proof. If you see it get censored, I just wouldn’t say it.

I can see that, but if you really want to enforce it, there shouldn't be some loosy goosy rule about it. It gives people an incentive to look for infractions for people they don't like, and lends credence to the notion that mods are picking and choosing who they punish. Rules are rules. Can you post F*****, C***, N*****, etc, in any context or not? If not, it should be a rule that everyone can understand, and not a rule that is enforced selectively.

If anyone in here posts porn for example, there is no nuance, or consideration for reputation. It's an immediate ban, or dubs. Why is language any different?

 

[Lead]

I can see that, but if you really want to enforce it, there shouldn't be some loosy goosy rule about it. It gives people an incentive to look for infractions for people they don't like, and lends credence to the notion that mods are picking and choosing who they punish. Rules are rules. Can you post F*****, C***, N*****, etc, in any context or not? If not, it should be a rule that everyone can understand, and not a rule that is enforced selectively.

That’s why I’m saying not to do it at all cause I think it’s suppose to be acted upon. I don’t think you can post the words that way either. That’s why I’m saying to steer clear of it. If you really needed to use it for the purpose of the discussion, I’d do something like “n word” and never in a derogatory context, even mockingly. That gets people sometimes.

Edit- I’ve actually noticed people use without actually writing the word at all (they just put a number of those smileys in. Mods can see if they wrote the actual word or not)