War Room Lounge v78: Figure someone will make a thread eventually.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ruprecht said:
Context always makes a difference.
Click to expand...

...

Slurs are against the rules regardless of context
Click to expand...

<JagsKiddingMe>

but the default infraction is only 6 points, not a ban. However if it's clear from the context that it's not actually being used as a slur and the user has no history of similar infractions, they might even get away with a warning. Conversely obvious racism might result in an immediate ban.
There's all sorts of similar contextual differences. White belts don't get many chances. Retread accounts likewise. Accounts that have been here over a decade without issue get more leniency. There's a bunch of users that are ban on sight if they evade the autonomous systems.
Click to expand...

I guess...

Even posting porn. One user hot linked to an image and the website he linked to changed the image to porn. He was temporarily banned, but allowed back within a week.
Click to expand...

I'm talking actual porn. Like gifs everyone can see. Ain't no nuance in that. Whoever posted it, is done.

Whatever though.
 
Why are we even discussing if the N word is appropriate to use?
 
HereticBD said:
...



<JagsKiddingMe>
Click to expand...

That post made sense. He said it’s always against the rules but the punishment may vary based on the number of things he listed. Whether it’s a warning, a card or dubs, the point is to make the poster aware they broke a rule and to avoid doing it again.
 
Sycho Sid said:
Why are we even discussing if the N word is appropriate to use?
Click to expand...

Someone brought up the word filter and I make an effort to clarify as many times as possible that the filter isn’t there to use those words since they will just be censored. I think that still confuses people so I reiterate it when I can.
 
HereticBD said:
...



<JagsKiddingMe>
Click to expand...

Did you not understand that? It's pretty straight forward. It's always against the rules, but the penalty varies according to context. Including both the context of the post and the context of the user history.

I guess...

I'm talking actual porn. Like gifs everyone can see. Ain't no nuance in that. Whoever posted it, is done.

Whatever though.
Click to expand...

Yes, there are very few contexts where posting porn will result in anything but an immediate ban, but even for porn there's been exceptions.
Doxxing and porn are bans. Followed by revealing the content of PMs. Even for those rules though, there's still been contextual differences. Including whether the poster is allowed back.
 
Lead said:
That post made sense. He said it’s always against the rules but the punishment may vary based on the number of things he listed. Whether it’s a warning, a card or dubs, the point is to make the poster aware they broke a rule and to avoid doing it again.
Click to expand...

I've said my piece.
 
HereticBD said:
...



<JagsKiddingMe>



I guess...



I'm talking actual porn. Like gifs everyone can see. Ain't no nuance in that. Whoever posted it, is done.

Whatever though.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure we've already conclusively demonstrated that you're a great beneficiary of discretion in moderation. I suggest you lean into it and really test your clout here with a toe-on-the-line sort of post. Like porn, but animated porn. Or just screenshots of nipples that cannot be decisively determined to be female, etc.
 
Trotsky said:
Pretty sure we've already conclusively demonstrated that you're a great beneficiary of discretion in moderation.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure you're just bitter that I can follow the rules, and you can't.

I suggest you lean into it and really test your clout here with a toe-on-the-line sort of post. Like porn, but animated porn. Or just screenshots of nipples that cannot be decisively determined to be female, etc.
Click to expand...

Already did. No dubs.

What can I say? My input is appreciated on this site more than yours.
 
I just noticed that Trump was trying to tell people that El-Big-Daddy was worse than Bin Laden. Woof. And LOL.
 
HereticBD said:
Pretty sure you're just bitter that I can follow the rules, and you can't.
Click to expand...

Yikes. We actually saw you saying verbatim what I was infracted for, but without any accompanying substance, among other supposedly prohibited conduct.

What can I say? My input is appreciated on this site more than yours.
Click to expand...

By the Madmick, Ruprecht, et al.? Absolutely. You will not here any disagreement from me on that point. You're definitely the caliber of poster that is most appreciated in the booth.
 
Trotsky said:
By the Madmick, Ruprecht, et al.? Absolutely. You will not here any disagreement from me on that point. You're definitely the caliber of poster that is most appreciated in the booth.
Click to expand...

I was dubbed by @Madmick for some questionable stuff in the past. However, I reasoned with him like an adult and got them lifted, instead of throwing a temper tantrum like yourself.

I guess that's the difference between me and you.
 
HereticBD said:
I was dubbed by @Madmick for some questionable stuff in the past. However, I reasoned with him like an adult and got them lifted, instead of throwing a temper tantrum like yourself.

I guess that's the difference between me and you.
Click to expand...

So you grovel to morons with delusional power complexes, and I call them out. Given our respective positions on Trump - me to his left and you around his shaft - I think that sounds about right.
 
Trotsky said:
So you grovel to morons
Click to expand...

I do not believe either are "morons". We may disagree from time to time, but neither of them are morons, and I wouldn't come to that conclusion because they slapped my wrist a couple of times, unlike you.

I call them out.
Click to expand...

Get a load of Edge McEdgy over here...LOL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,097
Messages
57,967,976
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top