- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 78,305
- Reaction score
- 16,104
I had planned to get to this as well. I see you're making a rather more general point here, but I think this is a bad example to anyone but the people already primed to get off on it. As is evidenced ITT. The Trumpets manufacture their own tizzies so this one more or less isn't going to matter, IMO.
The question is, can you similarly impugn their news reporting with anything other than the occasional bit of human error?
Was Russia Gate, the collusion part that was run on a near 24 hour cycles for 3 years, an occasional bit of human error?
How about the story about Clinton saying Russia was grooming Tulsi to be a 3rd party candidate?
Everybody ran with that story for 3 days before it was corrected that she may have legitimately been referring to Republicans rather than Russians (its ambiguous). Three days because nobody listened to the statement in context? Or for sensationalism? IDK. But try putting that genie back in the bottle (she was still way out of line for calling Stein a Russian asset and inferring that Tulsi was one also).
The NYT times has to release a statement after Trump got elected that they were going to "“rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor.” Why would they have to do that?
do you remember who Judith Miller is?
How about the WaPo running 16 negative stories about Bernie Sanders in 16 hours in 2016?
And my point was that, in the era of Trump, where he is attacking our free press, they are continuing to be careless. They are contributing to the gaslighting of this country and doing a disservice to themselves, our country, and the idea/ trust of our free press.

