I did not say that Dems are the "real" racists, nor was I suggesting that Repubs aren't racist. You are the one putting those words in my mouth, which is a dishonest habit of yours. The Dems certainly have historically done many racist things, which should be acknowledged. Isn't acknowledging our racist past the reason for the NYT's 1619 project? So why are the Dems always given a pass when they are at the thick of some of the most egregious racists moments in our history. Using false rape accusations to lynch blacks was a common tactic in Dem heavy areas during the Jim Crow era. Are you factually disputing that? That's why, to use an example from literature, To Kill a Mockingbird was about the intersection of racism and false rape accusations. It's why Clarence Thomas remarked when he was being falsely accused of sexual misconduct that it was a high tech lynching.
In this era of 'believe all women', why should we ignore the very ugly and racist history of that kind of thought in the US? If there is an erosion of the presumption of innocence, it isn't judges who went to Yale who are going to suffer most from it. It's going to be inner city blacks and other disadvantaged demographic groups. But the left is content to directly attack the presumption of innocence in the context of such accusations for political gain. It is utterly cynical, and you supported it anyway.