War Room Lounge v67: Is Australia Real?

Is Australia Real?


  • Total voters
    39
Status
Not open for further replies.
of course they would be let downs.

very rarely does a film adaptation do the book justice.

with the exception of maybe Jurassic Park, think of every Michael Crichton novel

Long books that don't rely on dialogue probably don't translate as well. The Maltese Falcon movie (the most famous version) did justice to the book, for example, but you'd expect that (still took three tries, though). I'm really looking forward to the film version of the Burnt Orange Heresy, though just from the description, they made some significant and odd changes.
 
not what I'm saying at all jack.

Forget it dude...we're not going to see eye to eye on this. I like you, so I'm not going to continue this conversation with you. if you want to talk about Murakami or a new book you read, or WWE, UFC, boxing, sure...I'm down.
OK, let's put the broader issue aside for a second. I think that you might not be aware that "ethnomasochist" is a white supremacist term for whites who are not racists. If you don't believe me, do your own research, and I'm confident you'll see that (links from AmRen, VDare, and other racist sites). And then I'd recommend reflecting on why they use the term and what you're (maybe inadvertently) communicating by using it yourself.

And BTW, as it happens, I'm in the middle of Kafka on the Shore right now, and wow. It's really amazing. This is only my second book of his, but he's shooting to near the top of my favorite author list.
My mind still always goes to Takashi Murakami first, cause I'm a visual arts nerd. I've heard good things about Haruki as well though.
 
My mind still always goes to Takashi Murakami first, cause I'm a visual arts nerd. I've heard good things about Haruki as well though.


definitely worth a read.

start with the Wind Up Bird Chronicles.

my personal favorite of his works.
 
do you guys do IP address bans? or permabans?

what prevents a poster from creating a new account after immediately being banned?

Sure, and IPs can be reported to the spam blacklists.
Not every poster has a static IP though, and there's obvious issues with banning IP ranges.
There's other methods of identifying returned posters, which usually means a bit of whack-a-mole when it comes to those that aren't welcome here at all anymore.
 
Sure, and IPs can be reported to the spam blacklists.
Not every poster has a static IP though, and there's obvious issues with banning IP ranges.
There's other methods of identifying returned posters, which usually means a bit of whack a mole when it comes to those that aren't welcome here at all anymore.

how does one get on these "not welcome anymore" lists?
 
how does one get on these "not welcome anymore" lists?

Usually continuing the same behaviour that lead to an initial ban.
In terms of that list... well, attempting to use Sherdog as a platform to promote White Nationalism means you aren't welcome here.
 
In all cereals, this is like....a fundamental part of Shapiro's "debate" style: to weave a bunch of patently incorrect statements into his argument, disguised as mere factual underpinning or foundation-laying, and then, if/when you try to address any or all one-at-a-time, fast-talk several more into the litigation of each initial lie.

Posters here do it too, although less skillfully. Lfd0311 is probably the most notable purveyor of this strategy of throwing out several errant arguments and, when you knock down each one, splitting each one of your responses into three more arguments (and again and again) while insisting that failure to reconcile any of these new generations of arguments thus validates the initial one. Posters like nostradumbass may try, or seem to try, to replicate the tactic but end up tying themselves in knots, as it does take some minimal clarity and vision.
Then there are the folks that will say something false, but then retreat to the "it's just a karate forum" or some other irreverent dismissal, letting the cat out of the bag: The point of the exchange wasn't to change your mind, the point was to drive you nuts.
 
White Progressive Ethno-Masochist.

the "woke" types.

the ones always lecturing us or attempting to edify us regarding race relations and all of the woes in the world.

the ones who think "only white people can be racist because derp derp power..."
Maybe you should look a little closer at these people bro.

You might not like what you see :)
 
Has to be one of the stranger lengthy exchanges I've seen. An Asian accusing whites of inverted racism by using a term favored by white supremacists, who themselves are proponents of overt racism against Asians and others. I will criticize perceived racism by relying on the language of explicit racists. Just odd.
 
According to some of these guys, not hating your self and refusing to feel guilty about something that you had nothing to do with means you must be a WN.
It's retarded.

compound this, with highlighting racial differences and telling people they are different from one another. these people don't realize just how racist they are
 
picture these "men" trying to defend their families, or courting a woman. lol.

I find it pretty feminine that you constantly imagine what other men are doing instead of doing something productive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,223
Messages
57,975,811
Members
175,889
Latest member
MEthzale
Back
Top