- Joined
- Sep 1, 2005
- Messages
- 24,379
- Reaction score
- 3,475
It's your preference. If you're slinging around shit about people being white race traitors, don't be surprised if you get treated like, say, a boat person or an Uncle Zhang.
Well, what standard do you want? Because if the standard is lobbing racial and race-traitor-based insults, that puts us all in a shitty spot. Go on, explain how it should be.this is great!
keep it up!
Thank goodness there's a term for the average Thursday night in the WR.
Being racist against Asians is just microracism.
Well, what standard do you want? Because if the standard is lobbing racial and race-traitor-based insults, that puts us all in a shitty spot. Go on, explain how it should be.
In all cereals, this is like....a fundamental part of Shapiro's "debate" style: to weave a bunch of patently incorrect statements into his argument, disguised as mere factual underpinning or foundation-laying, and then, if/when you try to address any or all one-at-a-time, fast-talk several more into the litigation of each initial lie.
Posters here do it too, although less skillfully. Lfd0311 is probably the most notable purveyor of this strategy of throwing out several errant arguments and, when you knock down each one, splitting each one of your responses into three more arguments (and again and again) while insisting that failure to reconcile any of these new generations of arguments thus validates the initial one. Posters like nostradumbass may try, or seem to try, to replicate the tactic but end up tying themselves in knots, as it does take some minimal clarity and vision.
Well, what standard do you want? Because if the standard is lobbing racial and race-traitor-based insults, that puts us all in a shitty spot. Go on, explain how it should be.
You'll have to come down out of your safe space though. Here, you've found an extremely derogatory and racist term that you think you can get away with, so you happily use it. When it's illustrated back to you in a form you don't immediately recognize, your impulse is to call it racism.I just always knew you leftist fucks, (especially WPEMs) were racist...always racist.
There's never been a shortage of posters employing the Gish Gallop.
You'll have to come down out of your safe space though. Here, you've found an extremely derogatory and racist term that you think you can get away with, so you happily use it. When it's illustrated back to you in a form you don't immediately recognize, your impulse is to call it racism.
Well, which is it? You're attempting to free-ride your racism into your politics, without accountability and retaining the right to cry racism into a mirror. You'll have to get your shit straight on this one, and not treat it like it's some kind of a war, or a CrossFit sesh.
You'll have to come down out of your safe space though. Here, you've found an extremely derogatory and racist term that you think you can get away with, so you happily use it. When it's illustrated back to you in a form you don't immediately recognize, your impulse is to call it racism.
Well, which is it? You're attempting to free-ride your racism into your politics, without accountability and retaining the right to cry racism into a mirror. You'll have to get your shit straight on this one, and not treat it like it's some kind of a war, or a CrossFit sesh.
If you want to do it over PM, that's fine too. I know there's an audience and you have trouble controlling the audience factor. Puts me at an unfair disadvantage. I think that your stock responses here show that you're uncomfortable with the subject because it's been shown back to you, and you see that it's ugly (that's a good thing). It happened the last time we talked about your racial slur, too.LOL...this is great. you're showing your true colors. (no pun intended).
Please continue.
Yeah, @LogicalInsanity, I don't really think that inventing new terms to dehumanize your opponents, in vaguely racist ways, really accomplishes anything positive. And if you're going to make a schtick of accusing everyone else of being racist, using that term undermines it.
Related but maybe distinct was my favorite: The Wikileaks dump thread. Someone tagged me in and asked for a comment, and I'm like, "what am I supposed to comment on?" And the link was to hundreds of pages with nothing really spelled out. I asked what the best examples of whatever they were talking about were. No one could actually point out what they found to be so bad, but lots of people were outraged by the question.
If you want to do it over PM, that's fine too. I know there's an audience and you have trouble controlling the audience factor. Puts me at an unfair disadvantage. I think that your stock responses here show that you're uncomfortable with the subject because it's been shown back to you, and you see that it's ugly (that's a good thing). It happened the last time we talked about your racial slur, too.
That doesn't really work when you have a racist slur right there in your custom text. I'll check back in this evening to see I've you've made your way into the light.dude..I love an audience...and I don't give a fu*k about my "comfort level". like I said, I've dealt with racists like you before...this is nothing new.
I'm just glad this forum got to see the real you.
That doesn't mean you don't care Jim, it means you're torn.That’s not true. I love everyone. <3
Except you. I am ambivalent toward you.
Sorry, but it is such an apt fit for people like Fawlty and other WPEMs like him. so cookie cutter and predictable. but it's fine....I've grown up with racist and racism in many different forms...like your boy Fawlty has clearly demonstrated in this thread.