War Room Lounge v61: Fun Fact: 'Race Bannon' describes two different individuals in Orbit Trump

[EGarrett]

@Prokofievian what do you think?

You might ask @Lead to add a poll for you

Add a poll to revoke yours.

 

[Prokofievian]

@Prokofievian what do you think?

You might ask @Lead to add a poll for you

Well, I am quite tall, and generally a good guy...

Whaddya say, @Lead?

 

[Limbo Pete]

Oh no, I'm the one who had fun at a lot of people's expense here.

<{cruzshake}>

 

[Jack V Savage]

Oh good, why don't you pick up where you ran away in that thread. You came in with an improper understanding of the term corruption, I showed you that it included dishonesty and I could demonstrate that by showing contradictions (among other things) in Hillary's words, and you tried a strawman argument which I immediately pointed out, then you magically disappeared from the exchange.Here's a screenshot for you...

Yeah, you did not defend your assertion that Clinton is corrupt. You can try now, if you wish.

 

[Fawlty]

Well, I am quite tall, and generally a good guy...

Whaddya say, @Lead?

How long are your shins?

 

[JDragon]

Well, I am quite tall, and generally a good guy...

Whaddya say, @Lead?

Add a couple drinks?

 

[EGarrett]

Well, I am quite tall, and generally a good guy...

Whaddya say, @Lead?

Just make sure you put your own membership on the poll.

 

[Sketch]

A wild Jack appears.

 

[Jack V Savage]

He could've argued that. I would've responded to whatever he tried to say. The issue though is that Jack thought he was clever and tried to use semantic arguments against other posters, which is why I did things like that to him. It made him very uncomfortable and he gave up trying to argue with me because his normal nitpicking (and attempts to cite obscure arguments or irrelevant studies) didn't work with me.

Unless I missed the quote (and Jack was known to try to reply without quoting me so I wouldn't see it), @Jack V Savage has run away yet again.

Chill out. I took my daughter swimming for a bit. Surely you are not delusional enough to genuinely believe these characterizations, are you? And you must realize that everyone reading is familiar with my posting so the mischaracterizations don't work as deception either.

 

[Sketch]

Oh no, I'm the one who had fun at a lot of people's expense here.

One thing I will admit, you are a nice guy.

 

[JDragon]

Add a poll to revoke yours.

@Lead we need a poll which plats status precisely needs revocation, there is a multitude of opinions

 

[Lead]

Add a couple drinks?

Called it

 

[Lead]

@Lead we need a poll which plats status precisely needs revocation, there is a multitude of opinions

There are different thoughts on whether we should push for big tent plats or pure plats. I for one am for the big tent plats so I will have to decline here.

I am not the least bit surprised a German is going the purity route.

 

[EGarrett]

Yeah, you did not defend your assertion that Clinton is corrupt. You can try now, if you wish.

No, I outlined multiple examples and you ran away because you know it was hopeless and too easy for me to establish it.

You didn't bother to challenge me on the examples or on the standard, and what little attempt you made was paper thin, as I will show right now.

You tried a strawman argument, when you said "then everyone is corrupt," when in reality, the definition applies to people in power. So no, not everyone is corrupt, and it has significance because dishonest people are not fit to hold power, so corruption should disqualify them.

Do you at least understand that part?

 

[Limbo Pete]

@Lead we need a poll which plats status precisely needs revocation, there is a multitude of opinions

Make it happen, Uncle Dana @Lead

 

[Fawlty]

I'm gonna dickwhip the CEO of eBay. I put up a few listings, and eBay tells me "hey fucker come check out this similar successful listing for tips breh" and so I do. Now eBay is sending me fucking personal emails asking if I'm still interested in buying this thing that is literally the same thing I have multiple seller listings for. Dickwhip. breh_

 

[LMP]

I am not the least bit surprised a German is going the purity route.

 

[Jack V Savage]

No, I outlined multiple examples and you ran away because you know it was hopeless and too easy for me to establish it.

Well, let's see the goods, then.

You tried a strawman argument, when you said "then everyone is corrupt," when in reality, the definition applies to people in power. So no, not everyone is corrupt.

You don't know what a "strawman" is, apparently. That's not a strawman. I'm saying that your definition is so expansive that it is meaningless. That's a true statement (and even if I were wrong, it's not a strawman).

 

[EGarrett]

Chill out. I took my daughter swimming for a bit. Surely you are not delusional enough to genuinely believe these characterizations, are you? And you must realize that everyone reading is familiar with my posting so the mischaracterizations don't work as deception either.

Wow, you took your daughter swimming for 2 years? Since you also ran away from every discussion where you tried to debate me 2 years ago?

Your posturing won't work. I showed you above that you tried to mischaracterize the definition as applying to everyone when it says specifically that it applies to people in power. So we'll start there to establish the standard.

(you know already that you don't have a chance in this )

 

[Lead]

Two years and five lounge thread pages in the making