War Room Lounge v61: Fun Fact: 'Race Bannon' describes two different individuals in Orbit Trump

What do you prefer? Pick one from each sequential pair. Or just click all over in mockery. Whatevs.


  • Total voters
    37
Status
Not open for further replies.
You know how it's really fun to fuck with Wai? Well EGarrett is like 5x funner to abuse. The problem is that he vanished like some sort of mythical pwn unicorn.
Whoever said his name 3 times into a dark mirror today needs a high five.
You can try to talk around me all you want. It won't get back your self-esteem. You're not knowledgeable enough to debate with me on anything that's of the slightest interest to me, and no amount of posturing or memes will change that. That's life.
 
My father told me he would rather I be dead than use socialized medicine, while my mother has literally saved my life... so I am good, thanks though.
You should talk to your father about that event. It is likely that he does not see it the same way as you. If you exit that conversation convinced of his wrongdoing, then forgive him. Understand that evil consumed his soul. Realize that he has many redeeming qualities that you are failing to appreciate due to your anger.


Which is why I showed that definition. I introduced the term and was asked to back it u p, so I showed a standard definition where it fit.

Ok. In this context, most people are going to read "corruption" using the "inducement" definition and not the "depravity" definition. I don't think it's reasonable to claim you forced Jack V Savage to "run away" or whatever.

Kudos for taking the time to spell out your case. I need to go water my garden now so I can't respond to all your points.
 
Limbo had his moderator status revoked, most likely because of his flaming and harassing other members, so you probably shouldn't try backseat moderating either.

You seem confused.
 
You should talk to your father about that event. It is likely that he does not see it the same way as you. If you exit that conversation convinced of his wrongdoing, then forgive him. Understand that evil consumed his soul. Realize that he has many redeeming qualities that you are failing to appreciate due to your anger.




Ok. In this context, most people are going to read "corruption" using the "inducement" definition and not the "depravity" definition. I don't think it's reasonable to claim you forced Jack V Savage to "run away" or whatever.

Kudos for taking the time to spell out your case. I need to go water my garden now so I can't respond to all your points.
I've already forgiven him, I am sure he did not understand what he was saying. That said, he said it, and I won't forget.
 
I heard a nasty rumor that people have been adding homonyms as of late. Rumors being what they are, it's possible that people are actually subtracting homonyms, but in either case, there is undoubtedly some manipulation of the natural and proper quantity of homonyms, and we should not stand for that.
 
Do you really think that Jack V Savage did not or does not know the definition of "corruption"?
He didn't know. You'd be amazed at how many simple gaps you can find in people's knowledge (yes, including me, though not in this case). Jack didn't understand what "ad hominem" meant, and in that case he didn't know that the definition of corruption included that.

That's a very weak way to attack his position. You spent almost no effort explaining how Clinton's behaviors met the definition.
I gave an outline and then Jack ran away instead of challenging me on it. Who's fault is that? (speaking of gaps in knowledge, for a long time I didn't know that "whose" is the correct word to use in the above sentence and that "who's" is actually only a contraction of "who is," though that's pretty minor)

It seems like you're more interested in some weird form of "winning" than in uncovering truth.
I was interested in showing Jack that he wasn't particularly good at semantics and trying to play games to support a candidate like Hillary wasn't going to work with me.

The War Room has a very, very, personalized and childish tone and these people are pursuing vendettas against me that are years old, so it's almost impossible to have a real constructive discussion. If you do want to have one, we can.
 
Ok. In this context, most people are going to read "corruption" using the "inducement" definition and not the "depravity" definition. I don't think it's reasonable to claim you forced Jack V Savage to "run away" or whatever.
He could've argued that. I would've responded to whatever he tried to say. The issue though is that Jack thought he was clever and tried to use semantic arguments against other posters, which is why I did things like that to him. It made him very uncomfortable and he gave up trying to argue with me because his normal nitpicking (and attempts to cite obscure arguments or irrelevant studies) didn't work with me.

Unless I missed the quote (and Jack was known to try to reply without quoting me so I wouldn't see it), @Jack V Savage has run away yet again.

Notice that I didn't troll. I invited him to continue or try something else. He just knows that he won't get away with any nonsense and if he tries semantics, I will out-semantics him.

Kudos for taking the time to spell out your case. I need to go water my garden now so I can't respond to all your points.
No problem, like I said, I'm a nice guy when not dealing with these psycho stalkers and I will answer any actual question people have of me.
 
You can try to talk around me all you want. It won't get back your self-esteem. You're not knowledgeable enough to debate with me on anything that's of the slightest interest to me, and no amount of posturing or memes will change that. That's life.
6hmoayH.gif
 
I heard a nasty rumor that people have been adding homonyms as of late. Rumors being what they are, it's possible that people are actually subtracting homonyms, but in either case, there is undoubtedly some manipulation of the natural and proper quantity of homonyms, and we should not stand for that.
 
I heard a nasty rumor that people have been adding homonyms as of late. Rumors being what they are, it's possible that people are actually subtracting homonyms, but in either case, there is undoubtedly some manipulation of the natural and proper quantity of homonyms, and we should not stand for that.

subtracting a homonym is just adding a homonym's inverse.
 
Not sure why you're telling me this. Should I pelt you with popcorn? It's Orville Redenbacher if that makes a difference.
Adding it for the permanent record, because you guys like to lie about other posters here.
 
Unfortunately for you, Limbo Pete, you're not a moderator anymore, so you can get blocked. Which is exactly what a dumb spammer like you deserves. No matter what you say or how you try insult or attack me behind my back. You're just not smart enough to debate politics. You never will be. Now welcome back to block.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top