Perhaps not, but I hear from the right nuts on here all the time about how posters can "get people banned" that they don't like by directing nasty posts at them. I've asked more than once and never received an answer. How can anything anybody posts be said to get someone else banned unless you're a drooling nincompoop?
He's a right wing troll pretending to be a liberal, not a liberal. So according to you, that's your responsibility. Also, I think you have more than enough pull to get him banned, don't listen to @Lead, he's still pretty new here.
I assume you're talking about @Gandhi. Yeah he's a major problem but he owns 32.8% of the parent company.
Same here but I bet it's different people.
Or you get so mad that you try and dox another poster.
I’ve never reported anyone, and I don’t “want” anyone banned. But abig is just disgusting to me. Idk how that person hasn’t been banned yet. Constantly lying, defaming posters instead of honestly debating, fake news after fake news...
Grizzard is already banned. The overt racist stuff is just obvious need for banning. He was probably the worst poster I’ve ever seen here.
There was an upsurge after the so-called purge, of which I still know pretty close to fuck-all, and again after the "Homer Incident, and to me, it appears to persist to this day. @RR getting banned didn't help, mind. I certainly don't blame the mods for this. This idea is purely a symptom of obvious commonality among most of the shittiest members, because they get banned so much more often.
@A.C.
Trolling doesn’t bother me. Half of the time I get a kick out of it.
