War Room Lounge V195: Cleaning your room while high on pills with your pet lobster

Status
Not open for further replies.
we keep him around to amuse the troops

200.gif
I feel like I'm a beacon of morality and decency.
 
Re: Fawlty's Ban:

For those in the War Room, this poster has a prior history on the site, that has spanned over many years and multiple accounts, that extend beyond this sub-forum. Before Fawlty, there were at least four accounts on record he used and were banned for (i) doxxing a moderator (twice), (ii) creating alts, and (iii) harassing staff off-site. When he was given a chance to come back as Fawlty on his request, it was with the idea he was on thin ice and needed to conduct himself in the best behavior.

For a while, he kept his head down but then frequently started running into trouble with the severe accusation clause of the flaming guidelines (Examples: claiming/ suggesting a poster beats their family, likes underage women or molests the elderly on a few separate occasions). The last straw was a comment containing "Do you ask for some form of identification to verify their ages before you pay money to fuck them?".

We've been persistent and clear with the War Room and especially lounge regulars that severe accusations like this need to stop, whether explicit or implied. All of this is within the context of a different poster recently being temp banned for a similar issue so this isn't a case of Fawlty forgetting the policy. I understand you may disagree with that policy but we've at least made it clear enough to avoid having cards or bans applied to your own accounts. Please keep in mind that those with prior bans on record will be given less leeway. Do not try to skirt around the rule unless you want to risk a similar action at this point.

I appreciate the response to the ban. I get certain contributors are pain in the ass and that there is a point when the mods get tired of their shit. IMO that line from Fawlty is far from a direct accusation.

I get that the mods and admin have to decide what sort of content is allowed to be posted, and at some level the site is responsible for the content that is allowed to be posted here. Fawlty may have broken several rules that he deserves to be banned for. I think the staff was wrong to use this instance to swing the hammer.

For Oeshon, they divulged certain information on a public forum about their sexual exploitation of women in Thailand. That information was given freely. Thialand has a well known problem with child sex trade. There is no age checking or safety net to insure that the women being exploited are of age. The people that are taking advantage of the prostitution, even of legal age individuals, are contributing to the underage sex trafficking that is happening there. It is a fucked up thing and should certainly be called out.

I get that you guys try to give more leeway to people that have contributed more, and dont always enforce the rules the same. This creates a lot of problems for the staff of this site and a lot of grey area in the rules.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top