War Room Lounge V195: Cleaning your room while high on pills with your pet lobster

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lead said:
Re: Fawlty's Ban:

For those in the War Room, this poster has a prior history on the site, that has spanned over many years and multiple accounts, that extend beyond this sub-forum. Before Fawlty, there were at least four accounts on record he used and were banned for (i) doxxing a moderator (twice), (ii) creating alts, and (iii) harassing staff off-site. When he was given a chance to come back as Fawlty on his request, it was with the idea he was on thin ice and needed to conduct himself in the best behavior.

For a while, he kept his head down but then frequently started running into trouble with the severe accusation clause of the flaming guidelines (Examples: claiming/ suggesting a poster beats their family, likes underage women or molests the elderly on a few separate occasions). The last straw was a comment containing "Do you ask for some form of identification to verify their ages before you pay money to fuck them?".

We've been persistent and clear with the War Room and especially lounge regulars that severe accusations like this need to stop, whether explicit or implied. All of this is within the context of a different poster recently being temp banned for a similar issue so this isn't a case of Fawlty forgetting the policy. I understand you may disagree with that policy but we've at least made it clear enough to avoid having cards or bans applied to your own accounts. Please keep in mind that those with prior bans on record will be given less leeway. Do not try to skirt around the rule unless you want to risk a similar action at this point.
Click to expand...
<WellThere>
 
Lead said:
Re: Fawlty's Ban:

For those in the War Room, this poster has a prior history on the site, that has spanned over many years and multiple accounts, that extend beyond this sub-forum. Before Fawlty, there were at least four accounts on record he used and were banned for (i) doxxing a moderator (twice), (ii) creating alts, and (iii) harassing staff off-site. When he was given a chance to come back as Fawlty on his request, it was with the idea he was on thin ice and needed to conduct himself in the best behavior.

For a while, he kept his head down but then frequently started running into trouble with the severe accusation clause of the flaming guidelines (Examples: claiming/ suggesting a poster beats their family, likes underage women or molests the elderly on a few separate occasions). The last straw was a comment containing "Do you ask for some form of identification to verify their ages before you pay money to fuck them?".

We've been persistent and clear with the War Room and especially lounge regulars that severe accusations like this need to stop, whether explicit or implied. All of this is within the context of a different poster recently being temp banned for a similar issue so this isn't a case of Fawlty forgetting the policy. I understand you may disagree with that policy but we've at least made it clear enough to avoid having cards or bans applied to your own accounts. Please keep in mind that those with prior bans on record will be given less leeway. Do not try to skirt around the rule unless you want to risk a similar action at this point.
Click to expand...
It’s official. He’s a pack.
 
Lead said:
Re: Fawlty's Ban:

For those in the War Room, this poster has a prior history on the site, that has spanned over many years and multiple accounts, that extend beyond this sub-forum. Before Fawlty, there were at least four accounts on record he used and were banned for (i) doxxing a moderator (twice), (ii) creating alts, and (iii) harassing staff off-site. When he was given a chance to come back as Fawlty on his request, it was with the idea he was on thin ice and needed to conduct himself in the best behavior.

For a while, he kept his head down but then frequently started running into trouble with the severe accusation clause of the flaming guidelines (Examples: claiming/ suggesting a poster beats their family, likes underage women or molests the elderly on a few separate occasions). The last straw was a comment containing "Do you ask for some form of identification to verify their ages before you pay money to fuck them?".

We've been persistent and clear with the War Room and especially lounge regulars that severe accusations like this need to stop, whether explicit or implied. All of this is within the context of a different poster recently being temp banned for a similar issue so this isn't a case of Fawlty forgetting the policy. I understand you may disagree with that policy but we've at least made it clear enough to avoid having cards or bans applied to your own accounts. Please keep in mind that those with prior bans on record will be given less leeway. Do not try to skirt around the rule unless you want to risk a similar action at this point.
Click to expand...


So is he permanently banned?
 
Sickness1 said:
wow that's awesome. I've seen slipknot twice both times here in Indiana. Never seen stone sour yet. Corey probably has the most raw voice in metal today. I wish him and Dave grohl would make more music with each other or even a album.
Click to expand...
In metal, Corey IS THE best voice in metal by far at the moment. He and Dave love each other!! And I love Dave too.
This was so brilliant. If we all get our feet again vaccine wise I can't wait to see him again. I've missed out on tickets I bought for In Flames, Lamb of God, Megadath and Trivium which would have been a good evening.

 
By the way, that "last straw" comment he made is pretty funny if you read it in Dave Chappelle's voice.
 
Lead said:
Re: Fawlty's Ban:

For those in the War Room, this poster has a prior history on the site, that has spanned over many years and multiple accounts, that extend beyond this sub-forum. Before Fawlty, there were at least four accounts on record he used and were banned for (i) doxxing a moderator (twice), (ii) creating alts, and (iii) harassing staff off-site. When he was given a chance to come back as Fawlty on his request, it was with the idea he was on thin ice and needed to conduct himself in the best behavior.

For a while, he kept his head down but then frequently started running into trouble with the severe accusation clause of the flaming guidelines (Examples: claiming/ suggesting a poster beats their family, likes underage women or molests the elderly on a few separate occasions). The last straw was a comment containing "Do you ask for some form of identification to verify their ages before you pay money to fuck them?".

We've been persistent and clear with the War Room and especially lounge regulars that severe accusations like this need to stop, whether explicit or implied. All of this is within the context of a different poster recently being temp banned for a similar issue so this isn't a case of Fawlty forgetting the policy. I understand you may disagree with that policy but we've at least made it clear enough to avoid having cards or bans applied to your own accounts. Please keep in mind that those with prior bans on record will be given less leeway. Do not try to skirt around the rule unless you want to risk a similar action at this point.
Click to expand...

Fawlty screwed Fawlty<21>
 
Lead said:
Re: Fawlty's Ban:

For those in the War Room, this poster has a prior history on the site, that has spanned over many years and multiple accounts, that extend beyond this sub-forum. Before Fawlty, there were at least four accounts on record he used and were banned for (i) doxxing a moderator (twice), (ii) creating alts, and (iii) harassing staff off-site. When he was given a chance to come back as Fawlty on his request, it was with the idea he was on thin ice and needed to conduct himself in the best behavior.

For a while, he kept his head down but then frequently started running into trouble with the severe accusation clause of the flaming guidelines (Examples: claiming/ suggesting a poster beats their family, likes underage women or molests the elderly on a few separate occasions). The last straw was a comment containing "Do you ask for some form of identification to verify their ages before you pay money to fuck them?".

We've been persistent and clear with the War Room and especially lounge regulars that severe accusations like this need to stop, whether explicit or implied. All of this is within the context of a different poster recently being temp banned for a similar issue so this isn't a case of Fawlty forgetting the policy. I understand you may disagree with that policy but we've at least made it clear enough to avoid having cards or bans applied to your own accounts. Please keep in mind that those with prior bans on record will be given less leeway. Do not try to skirt around the rule unless you want to risk a similar action at this point.
Click to expand...
I appreciate all this explanation but I can’t stop laughing at the accusation that a poster “molests the elderly.”

I guess I missed that one. Almost sounds like an act of charity rather than a crime...
 
Lead said:
Re: Fawlty's Ban:

For those in the War Room, this poster has a prior history on the site, that has spanned over many years and multiple accounts, that extend beyond this sub-forum. Before Fawlty, there were at least four accounts on record he used and were banned for (i) doxxing a moderator (twice), (ii) creating alts, and (iii) harassing staff off-site. When he was given a chance to come back as Fawlty on his request, it was with the idea he was on thin ice and needed to conduct himself in the best behavior.

For a while, he kept his head down but then frequently started running into trouble with the severe accusation clause of the flaming guidelines (Examples: claiming/ suggesting a poster beats their family, likes underage women or molests the elderly on a few separate occasions). The last straw was a comment containing "Do you ask for some form of identification to verify their ages before you pay money to fuck them?".

We've been persistent and clear with the War Room and especially lounge regulars that severe accusations like this need to stop, whether explicit or implied. All of this is within the context of a different poster recently being temp banned for a similar issue so this isn't a case of Fawlty forgetting the policy. I understand you may disagree with that policy but we've at least made it clear enough to avoid having cards or bans applied to your own accounts. Please keep in mind that those with prior bans on record will be given less leeway. Do not try to skirt around the rule unless you want to risk a similar action at this point.
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
"Young trim" will outlive every poster in the lounge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,116
Messages
57,968,850
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top