• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

War Room Lounge v191: Normal scrutiny should apply

Who made the worst post in the last thread? (nominees below)


  • Total voters
    39
Status
Not open for further replies.
Trots was hitting Oeshon for his own comments in the past (connecting some dots in a controversial way, though). Don't think there's anything to moderate there. But anyway, good that it's only temporary. I've had issues with him playing looser with the truth than I think is right but he's a major contributor here.
It was the connecting of the dots. Trots isn't stupid, he knew what he was doing.
 
He was recently dubbed for telling someone that “you watch child porn and want to have sex with kids” and he pulled the :eek::eek::eek::eek: card again so soon? Some “lawyer” he is.
 
Yeah. I mean it’s beyond scummy to be bragging about making $30 hookers buy you dinner in addition to the sex, but he never implied she was underage.

https://forums.sherdog.com/posts/33766899/


But still so weird that of all the super strict lines to take this is where Sherdog has a 0 tolerance policy

glad to hear it’s a temp
Aside from what he did or didn't say I was disappointed to see the pic links are broken or I could see for myself what sort of girl he was getting with based only on a photo.
 
All the talk of it yesterday gave me a craving for ramen. It was a great lunch. I'm one lucky sumbish. Not the spicy stuff though. I want to enjoy that rich flavour if the chef is going to go to all the trouble to put it in there.
 
Can we be like...sarcastic about someone being a :eek::eek::eek::eek:? For example, could I say ''there's about as good of a chance that you're a :eek::eek::eek::eek: as there is of Rudy Giuliani overturning the presidential election'' or would that depend on if I'm one of the few retards on this forum who actually believe that?

Can we claim someone is absolutely not a :eek::eek::eek::eek:, but then put a fact check flag on the post like twitter puts on all Trump tweets for the last couple weeks?
 
Can we be like...sarcastic about someone being a :eek::eek::eek::eek:? For example, could I say ''there's about as good of a chance that you're a :eek::eek::eek::eek: as there is of Rudy Giuliani overturning the presidential election'' or would that depend on if I'm one of the few retards on this forum who actually believe that?

Can we claim someone is absolutely not a :eek::eek::eek::eek:, but then put a fact check flag on the post like twitter puts on all Trump tweets for the last couple weeks?
You're probably better off not typing that word in reference to another poster.
 
He was recently dubbed for telling someone that “you watch child porn and want to have sex with kids” and he pulled the :eek::eek::eek::eek: card again so soon? Some “lawyer” he is.
LOL WTF

Jesus. Just reading that gave me AIDS, I see why SD doesn’t want accusations, no doubt it’s for analytics/search filter/whatever.

Just seeing those words stringed together make me nervous. What’s funny is that I’m way more empathetic to the rules when it is explained instead of the vague “don’t do it, we don’t want that”
 
Can we be like...sarcastic about someone being a :eek::eek::eek::eek:? For example, could I say ''there's about as good of a chance that you're a :eek::eek::eek::eek: as there is of Rudy Giuliani overturning the presidential election'' or would that depend on if I'm one of the few retards on this forum who actually believe that?

Can we claim someone is absolutely not a :eek::eek::eek::eek:, but then put a fact check flag on the post like twitter puts on all Trump tweets for the last couple weeks?
Reported.
 
so-we-agree-492ff2a7d3.jpg


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top