War Room Lounge v167: The Safest Space on Earth

[Gutter Chris]

The main problem is that he has night terrors.

Replace cobras with WPEM's or whatever.

Those wpems gave him ptsd. Last time he saw some dude yellin bout youre a white man it took 45 minutes and a half a dozen pancakes to get him out from under the kitchen table.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

Just a heads up I will put you on ignore if you continue posting reddit videos, which for some reason on this shit ass site keep autoplaying non stop.

It doesn't happen to me , for Sherdog I use duckduckgo , can't remember why but I don't get the autoplay and its muted by default when I do click on it .

 

[JDragon]

Just a heads up I will put you on ignore if you continue posting reddit videos, which for some reason on this shit ass site keep autoplaying non stop.

He can't help himself since he went to Reddit where the competition is easier



@Higus

 

[PolishHeadlock2]

Good idea

@Social Distance Warrior, will you marry me?

Get ready for this

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

@Kaliph of Kush and @Social Distance Warrior 's wedding

**like

and fu*king LOL


and Reported for cultural appropriation.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

OH yes!!! It's going to be so much fun! I will take care of you and protect you and we'll play games whenever I want to!

first wedding night...
we binge watch the first 8 seasons of SImpsons.

the classics

 

[Trotsky]

So I take it this nonsense hasn’t caught on in mainland Europe? At least not in nations that have gendered grammar?

Latinos is fine, saying Latinos and latinas is already unnecessary. Latinos is the traditionally proper way to describe a combination of Latinos and latinas together.

I couldn't care less about the topic, but you get that your argument is circular, right?

A group of men is "Latinos" and a group of women is "Latinas." You're saying that, because gender neutral groups of Latin American people are already referred to by defaulting to the masculine term (i.e. "the traditionally proper way") that's it's not gendered. But it is. That civilizations are traditionally described according to identification with men is the whole issue.

Of course, I find the pronoun people to be annoying, but the anti-pronoun people are even more annoying imo.

 

[The Diplomat]

**like

and fu*king LOL


and Reported for cultural appropriation.

Either "We Are All One" as the great Genki Sudo put it:

or we aren't. I prefer the former

 

[tonni]

first wedding night...
we binge watch the first 8 seasons of SImpsons.

the classics

I physically can't sit still that long my man.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

Either "We Are All One" as the great Genki Sudo put it:

or we aren't. I prefer the former

lmao...agreed my brother.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

I physically can't sit still that long my man.

true...same here...ADHD has its pros and cons.

 

[Jack V Savage]

That's how they're able to push extremely unpopular policy through. It's a ridiculous system.

Obviously, getting conservative rubes to feel shame is off the table. But can we at least get them to a place of understanding irony?

These fuckers say "shouldn't have resisted!" when a black kid gets killed and defend the killer cop, yet the top replies to the initial video are calling for the termination of the officers for not upholding the constitution and refusing to arrest this bloke.

Frank Wilhiot:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

Really that simple.

 

[BEER]

 

[Higus]

Ugh, that turns my stomach

 

[PolishHeadlock2]

Have you ever tried drinking milk through a hotdog but found it too difficult?

 

[Jesus H. Sherdog]

I couldn't care less about the topic, but you get that your argument is circular, right?

A group of men is "Latinos" and a group of women is "Latinas." You're saying that, because gender neutral groups of Latin American people are already referred to by defaulting to the masculine term (i.e. "the traditionally proper way") that's it's not gendered. But it is. That civilizations are traditionally described according to identification with men is the whole issue.

Of course, I find the pronoun people to be annoying, but the anti-pronoun people are even more annoying imo.

I’m not saying it’s not gendered. Where’d you get that from? I consistently referred to gendered grammar in Spanish.

I’m just saying it’s pointless to change it, especially the people who don’t even speak Spanish who want to change it. Literally every noun, adjective and article is gendered in Spanish one way or the other. I think people should just get over it because the other option is to cancel Spanish which to me seems much more problematic.

 

[Gregolian]

I’m not saying it’s not gendered. Where’d you get that from? I consistently referred to gendered grammar in Spanish.

I’m just saying it’s pointless to change it, especially the people who don’t even speak Spanish who want to change it. Literally every noun, adjective and article is gendered in Spanish one way or the other. I think people should just get over it because the other option is to cancel Spanish which to me seems much more problematic.

Japanese too.

There are different ways you address people based on their gender within a sentence.

 

[Denter]

That's how they're able to push extremely unpopular policy through. It's a ridiculous system.



Frank Wilhiot:



Really that simple.

I'm sure you are aware that the original deal in 1787 ( a right-wing coup, IMO) was to allow equal representation of each state in the Senate, in order to get small states like Connecticut and Rhode Island to sign on. The anti-democratic nature of the Senate was a feature, not a bug. They weren't even popularly elected until the 20th century.

 

[Prokofievian]

Japanese too.

There are different ways you address people based on their gender within a sentence.

@Trotsky

 

[PolishHeadlock2]

I'm sure you are aware that the original deal in 1787 ( a right-wing coup, IMO) was to allow equal representation of each state in the Senate, in order to get small states like Connecticut and Rhode Island to sign on. The anti-democratic nature of the Senate was a feature, not a bug. They weren't even popularly elected until the 20th century.

So we can change it.