- Joined
- Oct 22, 2009
- Messages
- 26,061
- Reaction score
- 9,794
The problem with being anti-globalization is that first you have to define what that is... and I have yet to get a consistent set of answers.
I mean, you don't need to look further than the fact that the term "alt right" was coined by Richard Spencer to realize a lot of their talking points were just Nazi propaganda repackaged to fit the world today and to be more presentable to a mainstream audience at first glance. Get an alt righter and a white nationalist talking at the same time, swap a few key words and they're basically the same person. Globalists = Joos; the West = the white race; culture = genetics.
Their greatest feat was getting some of the people involved to buy into this switcharoo unknowingly. It's really hard to tell who you're dealing with when they start talking because they might not even realize the tune they're singing.
The man in my av has written about it many times but it's harder to find his speeches online instead of print funny enough.
Here's a really good thing I've read. It's translated but Zapatistas and la antigloabizacion is right up my alley. Also brilliantly points out how Trump is still a neoliberal.
You can translate the article but the entire thing is an incredible readJorge Fonseca, professor of International Economics at the Complutense University of Madrid and member of the ATTAC scientific council, expresses himself in the same vein: “At the moment, what there is is a push for hegemony in globalization in which the United States lost its condition of absolute hegemonic power and what they seek is to recover it 'by renegotiating globalization', which will continue to be neoliberal, unless a deep crisis such as that of the 1930s forces them to break it ”. And Fonseca continues: “In reality, anti-systemic movements are alter-globalization and Trump's alleged anti-globalization attitude is actually blackmail to renegotiate with more advantage the terms of free trade agreements at a time when the United States is socially cracked by inside. And the 'defensive' sovereignist policies of Latin American countries are not comparable with offensive nationalist policies such as those of the United States or the United Kingdom. While the former sought to limit international looting, the latter sought to increase it ”.
https://ctxt.es/es/20170118/Politica/10625/globalización-Seattle-Zapata-Trump-portoalegre-nafta.htm