WAR ROOM LOUNGE V15: Lunge

[HomerThompson]

Just out of curiosity, what the heck are you talking about? @Trotsky, you can answer too. What study? What thread was this in?

 

[N13]

It wasn't meant to be a slight at all lol.
Could just tell by your salesmanship.

I didn't take it as a slight. My first thought was: This poster has some talent.

Believe me, the corruption amongst the Realtors is rampant, but I wasn't one of those fackers. I understand. The entire industry and its food chain is a mixed bag of candy. Some are tasty tasty and others are stuffed with bu-kak-key.

It was a good experience for me at the time. Humans are funny.



It was more fun than teaching philosophy at a university. Those chair riding asshats no next to nothing about human nature.

 

[N13]

Hey man if you can't handle the truth and are going to have a progressive meltdown every time then I think it's best that you avoid these threads.

Deprogramming is not for everyone.

You mad Bro? Be peaceful, relax, chill.

I bet you follow Q.

[Point 3 - FAKE NEWS LOGIC]
If people believe the 'majority' of people feel a certain way about something….
Do they 'go with the majority' to feel accepted?
If the 'majority' of people believe something does that imply it must be RIGHT?
Does this give rise to 'we are the majority' mindset?
Define 'Echo Chamber'.
: a metaphorical description of a situation in which beliefs are amplified or reinforced by communication and repetition inside a closed system?

Patriot -
A little perspective…
Patriots are dying to defend this great country and the FREEDOM she provides.
Children are being kidnapped, tortured, raped, and sacrificed in the name of PURE EVIL.
Stay the course.

Do not force those not yet ready.
The FAKE NEWS narrative (make-believe) has been ingrained for a long time.
Do not isolate yourself within your own family.
Dark to Light.
TRUTH will SHINE.
Impossible to DEFEND.
Impossible to IGNORE.
Stay Strong.
You are NOT ALONE
Q

It took me a while to understand that highlighted part. I had to make some adjustments and consider the neurological significance of the situation at hand. I'm a Cultural Engineer, dammit.

 

[WTF2008]

I didn't take it as a slight. My first thought was: This poster has some talent.

Believe me, the corruption amongst the Realtors is rampant, but I wasn't one of those fackers. I understand. The entire industry and its food chain is a mixed bag of candy. Some are tasty tasty and others are stuffed with bu-kak-key.

It was a good experience for me at the time. Humans are funny.



It was more fun than teaching philosophy at a university. Those chair riding asshats no next to nothing about human nature.

I've never done anything in sales but have known a lot of people that have.

You ever get really annoyed by sales people because you know exactly what they're trying to do?

It drives me nuts. Can't imagine how it is for a pro.
Unless you get a bad one and want to help him along.

 

[Jack V Savage]

OK, no answers, but I think I found it:

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/o...right-than-all-others-combined.3706521/page-5

If that's it, I can see why Trotsky would be dismissive of Heretic. Actually happens a lot that partisans see studies and come up with some poor objection that would obviously have occurred to the designers and been adjusted for and dismiss all findings on that ground. In this case, Heretic sees some possible subjectivity in the classifications and sees that as a reason to blindly (i.e., without looking further) dismiss everything. The end point of this moronic approach is a complete lack of any knowledge, which in practice doesn't mean that everyone denies knowing anything but that they claim to know everything, just with weaker justification than folks who believe in the existence of objective truth but proceed with *reasonable* humility regarding their access to it.

And in case you think I'm exaggerating, here:

This study here is ridiculous in premise period. As many forms of FAKE news are not fake to everyone.

Even the premise of this study is impossible. As fake is subjective. It's like saying GOP or DEM politicians lie more.

 

[N13]

I've never done anything in sales but have known a lot of people that have.

You ever get really annoyed by sales people because you know exactly what they're trying to do?

It drives me nuts. Can't imagine how it is for a pro.
Unless you get a bad one and want to help him along.

Of course I do, especially when they are trying to use their Jedi mind tricks on me.

IF you understand behavioral psychology, you can be an awesome sales person. Like I said, I learned a lot about people.

You might not be getting paid to be a sales person, but I guarantee you that you are one IRL. Everyone is. Think about it.

 

[N13]

Smart

No you smart.

 

[N13]

 

[Hollywood Jack]

Dude, you know how much I love your AV right?

 

[HomerThompson]

OK, no answers, but I think I found it:

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/o...right-than-all-others-combined.3706521/page-5

If that's it, I can see why Trotsky would be dismissive of Heretic. Actually happens a lot that partisans see studies and come up with some poor objection that would obviously have occurred to the designers and been adjusted for and dismiss all findings on that ground. In this case, Heretic sees some possible subjectivity in the classifications and sees that as a reason to blindly (i.e., without looking further) dismiss everything. The end point of this moronic approach is a complete lack of any knowledge, which in practice doesn't mean that everyone denies knowing anything but that they claim to know everything, just with weaker justification than folks who believe in the existence of objective truth but proceed with *reasonable* humility regarding their access to it.

And in case you think I'm exaggerating, here:

That thread is a perfect example of @HereticBD's arguing style. No insight, no suggestions, just dismissal out of hand because he doesn't like the results of the study/news story/data.

 

[N13]

Thread needs more soundtrack.

If you haven't heard this yet, enjoy. And if you have, enjoy.

 

[Ripskater]

That thread is a perfect example of @HereticBD's arguing style. No insight, no suggestions, just dismissal out of hand because he doesn't like the results of the study/news story/data.

Heretic's arguing style is better than yours

 

[N13]

Looks like the usual stack of you see walking down the street

 

[HomerThompson]

Heretic's arguing style is better than yours

Your mask is slipping again.

 

[HereticBD]

That thread is a perfect example of @HereticBD's arguing style. No insight, no suggestions, just dismissal out of hand because he doesn't like the results of the study/news story/data.

The study was bullshit though. A bunch of selective and subjective nonsense, with ZERO scientific merit in all areas.

Color me shocked that you and Jack are already sucking each other off though.

 

[N13]

Can we paly identify the Mooslims?

Butt plug inserted

Revealing dick size to congress

"I will lie"

I facked up and THEY killed my dad for it.

I'm not a US citizen. LOL The first foreigner to be potus.

 

[HomerThompson]

The study was bullshit though. A bunch of selective and subjective nonsense, with ZERO scientific merit in all areas.

Color me shocked that you and Jack are already sucking each off though.

Already?

That's a pretty old thread, man.

 

[Trotsky]

Then why are you about to tell me you remember it in some dishonest way...

You're right. I should have said I don't remember which thread, or "I don't remember the study or topic at hand." But my version, revisiting the thread now, seemed to be the consensus impression, and your position was predetermined dog shit.

Please. It was you and the usual Libby crew sucking each other's dicks over a heavily flawed, liberal leaning study, and attempting to obnoxiously shout down anyone who dared to question it's legitimacy. You got mad, because your lame tactics didn't work on me, and I continued to voice how stupid and flawed your precious study was.

Yes, the "lame tactics" of appreciating empirical findings are consistently lost on you. Maybe one day my legion of mean girls and I will evolve to the point of determining our positions independent of any facts, logic, or coherent reason, and just start using buzzwords and partisan denial.

Well, I don't run away and put people I disagree with on ignore, so I think I'm halfway there already.

I mean....I can't disagree with the fact that your tireless willingness to both pursue and lose the same arguments ad infinitum is probably your most proud and prominent trait here (and probably elsewhere as well). You're the argumentative and intellectual equivalent of zombie cannon fodder. Except zombie soldiers are kind of bad ass, and you're just kind of sad.

 

[N13]

I'm the anti-Christ.


The enemy of my enemies is my friend, but after he conquers the entire Earth, things will change.

 

[HomerThompson]

You're right. I should have said I don't remember which thread, or "I don't remember the study or topic at hand." But my version, revisiting the thread now, seemed to be the consensus impression, and your position was predetermined dog shit.



Yes, the "lame tactics" of appreciating empirical findings are consistently lost on you. Maybe one day my legion of mean girls and I will evolve to the point of determining our positions independent of any facts, logic, or coherent reason, and just start using buzzwords and partisan denial.



I mean....I can't disagree with the fact that your tireless willingness to both pursue and lose the same arguments ad infinitum is probably your most proud and prominent trait here (and probably elsewhere as well). You're the argumentative and intellectual equivalent of zombie cannon fodder. Except zombie soldiers are kind of bad ass, and you're just kind of sad.