War Room Lounge v148: all tip and no shaft

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember studying her in high school, interesting woman. The poacher who shot her is the one who needs hey-zeus, not me.

Bear>>>>>Gorillas.
One on one, yeah a grizzly has a significant but maybe not always a decisive advantage. 5 on 3, I think the gorillas work together, while bears would not. They can injure a bear.
 
Call me crazy but I can actually see one of these things attacking a full grown male elephant. Nothing beats the African elephant that we know of but I’d bet it’s because these pieces of Snow White shit live far away from them. I can picture this thing scaling the back of an elephant. God forbid there is more than one polar bear. Polar bears have that lanky strength that catches you off guard. We’ve all been there wrestling with some guy who looked skinny but tall and he is surprisingly strong. The difference is the polar bear is also incredibly charismatic.
The polar bear is probably the one animal crazy enough to attack an elephant, mistaking it for a landwalrus.
 
The polar bear is probably the one animal crazy enough to attack an elephant, mistaking it for a landwalrus.
And there it is. My tonni delivered belly laugh for the day
 
One on one, yeah a grizzly has a significant but maybe not always a decisive advantage. 5 on 3, I think the gorillas work together, while bears would not. They can injure a bear.
Thems would have to be some stoopid gorillas to go after a grizzly.
 
@Gregolian

https://danieldefense.com/ddm4rv7rp-02-128-17050.html

M3OWNmb.jpg


detTYMb.jpg


Cop or nah. In 5.56
 
That's obviously not how one would seriously attempt to answer the question. "Here's a guy. Let me list some bad/good moments in important situations with no broad context. Theory proved!"

Aaron Schatz took a look at the question in 2009:

http://insider.espn.com/nfl/insider/news/story?id=4502503

Weird take. Obviously, the topic requires individual analysis, and the fact that some quarterbacks exceed the average drop in rating while others play below it should in fact support the existence of clutch traits. And I wasn't using Favre as proof of a clutch vs. non-clutch trait across all quarterbacks but rather as proof that, whatever the moniker seeks to describe, he's a great example.

Let's take three of the quarterbacks most considered "clutch" in the past few decades:

Joe Flacco (career passer rating 3.7 points higher in playoffs than regular season)
Eli Manning (career passer rating 3.3 points higher in playoffs than regular season)
Joe Montana (career passer rating 3.3 points higher in playoffs than regular season).

Brett Favre during the seasons in question: playoff passer rating (77.8) is 16.4 points below regular season (94.2). During his entire career, his playoff passer rating is approximately 7.8 points lower (86.0) than regular season in corresponding playoff years (93.8).
 
Roll around with your pet rats and get abducted by a cannibal.
I used to have a pair of rats. Harry and Lamarr Jenkins. Lamarr lived to be about 5, and when he died, Harry buried him in newspaper in the corner of the cage. :(
 
Re-watched Fifth Element last night. Still a great movie.

Alien: We are warriors, not merchants.

Jean-Baptiste Zorg/Gary Oldman: But you can still count, right?!
 
Thems would have to be some stoopid gorillas to go after a grizzly.
Yeah, and the bears would be stupid to pick a fight like that too. But they're forced into combat magically by this hypothetical. Also there are eagles and rats and stuff around being all aggro.
 
<36>

Not a chance. Tigers are solitary hunters, meaning they are not animals that are really designed for fighting. Should they get sufficiently injured they are pretty much dead as they can't hunt.

This doesn't apply to bears or gorillas. Gorillas obviously fight each other so they are designed for combat. Bears fight each other as well and can get away with that because they don't have to hunt, they can forage.

Of course tigers fight other tigers as well but not as frequently as like lions or gorillas fight their own. Many tigers won't even attack an adult human if they are spotted despite outweighing them by a good margin and keep in mind tigers tend to live in underdeveloped areas like the Sunderbans so the people there aren't exactly Lesnar size.

I love tigers, they are awesome and one of my favorite cats. But they are not really fighters. Lions are far better because they can afford to fight and get a little injured since they are social animals and can rely on the pride/coalition for food.
Big bear> big cat> non-human primate
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,108
Messages
57,968,498
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair
Back
Top