- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 33,051
- Reaction score
- 23,520
I'm still confused about what constitutes "white civilization", especially when what we now call Europe has changed so very, very much over thousands of years.It's controversial if it's being used to support policies that brutally demean, suppress, exclude, or endanger nonwhite peoples (or white peoples who don't get the benefit of being associated with Western European cultural whiteness).
Also, the entire idea of racial purity and wanting to preserve some abstract cultural organism solely through skin tone is idiotic. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that the relative success of white civilization had anything to do with how fair their skin was, and there is likewise no evolutionary or biological benefit to racial purity. In fact, if the rest of nature is to suggest anything, racial purity is fundamentally bad and racial mixing is good for the human species in shortcutting race-pronounced hereditary problems like depression and skin cancer in white folks and heart disease in black folks.
Last edited: