War Room Longue V. 73: Royal Rumble

Who should judge?

  • Total voters
    35
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ha. Robert Deniro being sued for in appropriate touching in the workplace and calling the women he worked with sexist names
 
@zebby23

source.gif


Get online and work out an av bet with @MMAisGod before tonight's game starts damnit!!! You ducking the group chat?
 
Last edited:
HockeyBjj said:
@zebby23

source.gif


Get online and work out a sig bet with @MMAisGod before tonight's game starts damnit!!! You ducking the group chat?
Click to expand...

What do you expect from that beta cuck social democrat ultra liberal give me free because lazy mom's basement troll poster? The failed life version of Trots wants no parts of this. <{nope}>
 
Fawlty said:
Yeah no thanks, you know there are different standards for me. Shit, @Lead even carded me for joking about Palis after the dude was banned. God speed though.
Click to expand...

You made a comment hat Ripskater beats his wife and kids. I gave you a warning with no infractions and pointed out the piece in the flaming WR guidelines about specific accusations. Then a week or two later, you claimed Palis raped (molested I guess) an old man. If you ask some here, they’ve been hit with infractions the first go around so yes, you were given more leniency than most because you usually don’t break the rules.

Fawlty said:
You do have to appreciate the irony, Lead, that you get bent up real easy by me, yet you also see fit to let people spend literal years harassing me far worse than anything I've said to you.

This is what you should think about tonight while you're making love to whatever you make love on.
Click to expand...

We don’t have an easy way of defining harassment other than suggesting the ignore function or if the user breaks a guidelines in doing so (details the thread, flaming in the WR context, makes threat, etc.). Adding it to the guidelines will cause more trouble than its worth in having users point to it when they have issue with another poster. This actually helped you and other users when Egarret was adament rules were being broken and cards needed to be issued.
 
Lead said:
You made a comment hat Ripskater beats his wife and kids. I gave you a warning with no infractions and pointed out the piece in the flaming WR guidelines about specific accusations. Then a week or two later, you claimed Palis raped (molested I guess) an old man. If you ask some here, they’ve been hit with infractions the first go around so yes, you were given more leniency than most because you usually don’t break the rules.



We don’t have an easy way of defining harassment other than suggesting the ignore function or if the user breaks a guidelines in doing so (details the thread, flaming in the WR context, makes threat, etc.). Adding it to the guidelines will cause more trouble than its worth in having users point to it when they have issue with another poster. This actually helped you and other users when Egarret was adament rules were being broken and cards needed to be issued.
Click to expand...
EGarret? Now you're just making shit up about me. I've barely interacted with guy except during very short tantrums of his in here. Compare that, if you will, to years of it being nonstop (and one-sided).

Go ahead, I'll wait. Let the difference sink in. And "subjective" my ass, it's already in the rules, you idiot. You couldn't possibly have a clearer case of harassment. I should remind you yet again, this isn't the OT.

Also, who gives a shit if I joked that a banned poster told me a story about molesting a person? You had to go way off the reservation for that one. Thinnest cards in history, and naturally I have a comparison there, where you didn't do a fucking thing about people going after family: Homer. So suck it on that one, too.

Also, Ripskater was the most obvious troll account in the history of the forum.

But do go on digging. It ain't my e-grave. You're a good ol' boys' club noob, and spineless.
 
Lead said:
You made a comment hat Ripskater beats his wife and kids. I gave you a warning with no infractions and pointed out the piece in the flaming WR guidelines about specific accusations. Then a week or two later, you claimed Palis raped (molested I guess) an old man. If you ask some here, they’ve been hit with infractions the first go around so yes, you were given more leniency than most because you usually don’t break the rules.



We don’t have an easy way of defining harassment other than suggesting the ignore function or if the user breaks a guidelines in doing so (details the thread, flaming in the WR context, makes threat, etc.). Adding it to the guidelines will cause more trouble than its worth in having users point to it when they have issue with another poster. This actually helped you and other users when Egarret was adament rules were being broken and cards needed to be issued.
Click to expand...

And to think, we don't even need to order a PPV to watch these hilarious one sided beat-downs. All jokes aside, Lead, you're a saint to put up with what you do lol
 
Fawlty said:
EGarret? Now you're just making shit up about me. I've barely interacted with guy except during very short tantrums of his in here. Compare that, if you will, to years of it being nonstop (and one-sided).

Go ahead, I'll wait. Let the difference sink in. And "subjective" my ass, it's already in the rules, you idiot. You couldn't possibly have a clearer case of harassment. I should remind you yet again, this isn't the OT.

Also, who gives a shit if I joked that a banned poster told me a story about molesting a person? You had to go way off the reservation for that one. Thinnest cards in history, and naturally I have a comparison there, where you didn't do a fucking thing about people going after family: Homer. So suck it on that one, too.

Also, Ripskater was the most obvious troll account in the history of the forum.

But do go on digging. It ain't my e-grave. You're a good ol' boys' club noob, and spineless.
Click to expand...


Whoa...
 
HockeyBjj said:
Ha. Robert Deniro being sued for in appropriate touching in the workplace and calling the women he worked with sexist names
Click to expand...

I realize that you are not doing this, but it's depressing knowing that many will use this as a score for Trump, effectively equating the relevance of the morality of the president to that of a random celebrity that said he's unfit.
 
LogicalInsanity said:
Whoa...
Click to expand...

That is one hell of a manic post if I've ever seen one. Could be another episode. He called out DMF publically a few days ago, when it could have been a PM. Same with this recent attack on lead, he should be pming the moderators and staff not going after them in the public eye.
 
Trotsky said:
I realize that you are not doing this, but it's depressing knowing that many will use this as a score for Trump, effectively equating the relevance of the morality of the president to that of a random celebrity that said he's unfit.
Click to expand...

I just get a chuckle out of seeing someone either A) exposed as a hypocrite or B) someone who has praised unfounded accusations getting a taste of that flung back at them

Wasn't a Trump angle. Just another holier than though self ritcheous celeb taking an L
 
HockeyBjj said:
I just get a chuckle out of seeing someone either A) exposed as a hypocrite or B) someone who has praised unfounded accusations getting a taste of that flung back at them

Wasn't a Trump angle. Just another holier than though self ritcheous celeb taking an L
Click to expand...

I get irked by allegations of "holier than thou" when it comes to people being critical of unprecedented un-holiness. DeNiro may not be holier than you or the average citizen, but by all accounts of which we are aware, he is much holier than Trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,283,005
Messages
58,475,999
Members
176,048
Latest member
gibberish

Share this page

Back
Top