Blind title defenses shouldn't be the be-it end all.
Resume of who it was against should matter.
3x Max Holloway alone is better than anybody Aldo has beaten.
Aldo's best win is Mendes at best in his "domination" and has lost to virtually every other championship FW fighter.
You just don't know the history dude.
Both guys beat the champs that came before them.
Volk beat Max. Cool.
Max won the title and defended it 3x
Aldo beat the shit out of Faber who won the 145 title and then won his next 9 straight.
And Faber was still fighting for titles 6 years after he lost the belt and 4 years after Aldo beat him.
He didn't need to beat him 3x. The first fight was so ridiculously lopsided that it would have been unethical to put that match together again.
Volk faced a LW champ while he was champ. They fought twice.
He lost both and got KTFO the 2nd time.
Aldo faced a LW champ 2x who was champ while Aldo was champ. (Frankie)
Aldo beat him soundly both times.
If Aldo SPOKE ENGLISH he very very likely would have been the first "champ champ" while Conor McGregor was still unclogging toilets or taking welfare checks.
If you want to act like aldos wins aren't impressive when talking about them years afterwards then the same filter should be applied to Volks wins.
Volk almost got choked out by Ortega? Who? That guy who lost 4 of his last 6? Omg what a trash weak ass win!!
Right ? Let's call it both ways