Vikings are the GOAT

[frenz]

Nice Hollywood movie. Let me hit you with some facts.

1. The Spartans were notorious for being homosexuals
.

im not sure what their bedroom practices has to do with the topic at hand

 

[Rusk]

GOAT Warrior Genetics.

¨
Nah, i can literally rape 75% of Scandinavian male population. Scandinavians got thin bones and high estrogen. I mean look at Sweden.

If we talking about genetics when it comes to fighting then Africans, Slavs, Native Americans (and their modern ancestors) and Caucasians... are all more genetically giftet than Westerners.

With that said i am talking about average. I know they are exceptions and some genetically freaks in Scandinavia and the West.

 

[lsa]

¨
Nah, i can literally rape 75% of Scandinavian male population. Scandinavians got thin bones and high estrogen. I mean look at Sweden.

If we talking about genetics when it comes to fighting then Africans, Slavs, Native Americans (and their modern ancestors) and Caucasians... are all more genetically giftet than Westerners.

With that said i am talking about average. I know they are exceptions and some genetically freaks in Scandinavia and the West.

yeah yeah... in no way does this make you gay.

 

[Halge]

¨
Nah, i can literally rape 75% of Scandinavian male population.

You couldn't even buy me dinner, little man.

 

[STEVEN SEAGOLD]

¨
Nah, i can literally rape 75% of Scandinavian male population. Scandinavians got thin bones and high estrogen. I mean look at Sweden.

If we talking about genetics when it comes to fighting then Africans, Slavs, Native Americans (and their modern ancestors) and Caucasians... are all more genetically giftet than Westerners.

With that said i am talking about average. I know they are exceptions and some genetically freaks in Scandinavia and the West.

Generalizing the modern liberal Scandinavian era bro.

I assume you mean West Africans.

Scandinavians are conisdered the White "West Africans"...

Maybe not as bulky as perhaps slavs, but way more athletic. More akin to West African.



PS: Ivan Drogo actor is Scandinavian. Besides the point that Russia has Nordic-Slav mix in certain areas.

 

[blaseblah]

Nice Hollywood movie. Let me hit you with some facts.

1. The Spartans were notorious for being homosexuals
2. The 300 fought an army of slaves
3. They were classically Mediterranean sized. Compared to the hulking Germanic nords, pipsqueaks. Roman historians would often revel in the stature and supremacy of the Germanic.
4. They were only really known for their tactical strategies as a unit. Really they stole this from earlier Greeks.
5. They wore speedos and used BRONZE AGE weapons. Nothing compared to the iron supremacy of the nords.
6. The Vikings used all the strategies of the Spartans. These were not unique formations, like the Phalanx. They may have been some of the first to utilize it, but everyone since then used it... Including the Vikings.
7. Vikings used hallucinogens and psycho-tropics, ale, and special herbs, to numb pain and go into a frenzied rage. These were known as Beserkers.
8. Both The Vikings and The Spartans had a distinct warrior culture. But the Viking one was much more extreme. Dying in battle was seen as the utmost honor, and thus was rewarded with afterlife in Valhalla (Heaven)... Whereas a life without glorious battle and death, was seen as weak, pathetic and a one way trip to Helheim (Self explanatory).
9. The Spartans were defenders, whereas the Vikings were raiders and conquerors. Vikings had the experience of actual variable combat scenarios, while The Spartans stayed in their barracks, training. They never encountered the various scenarios that the Vikings did.

Vikings as warriors are superior.

lol at bringing up Hollywood movies and then using those stereotypes to make your argument.

1. No they weren't. And irrelevant.

2. The Persian army were not slaves. It was a real army with a massive advantage in numbers. On the other hand your Vikings are mostly famous for pillaging Christian monasteries and killing defenseless priests. How brave.

3. Movie stereotype. We've found Viking graves and their average height was 5'7. Via science and not movie magic they were manlets.

4. The Vikings were known for raiding defenseless farms and monasteries and then fleeing before actual warriors arrived. They were pussies. I mean it may be true that running away is the best defense, but they don't get props for that tactic.

5. Lol no, this ain't 300. They wore heavy armor. And if you're going to use iron vs bronze as an argument then Vikings get destroyed by all the more modern warriors.

6. Viking tactics were subterfuge and raiding. The Spartans were an actual military force.

7. Drug addicted retards that don't wear armor and use PEDs. This isn't helping your argument.

8. Complete bullshit. The Spartans were trained to kill since childhood. Vikings weren't even full time warriors. They were farmers most of the time.

9. The Vikings were trained and had experience in the same way pirates and thieves were. Attacking and raiding the weak, using their seafaring tactics to avoid any real conflict.

 

[ChucksGlassJaw]

Really good economy. The free wheelbarrow and hand cart are great. Wall > fast imp > archers + trebs.

They are the weakest land civ though. Definitely need a buff to their melee line.

Definitely a far weaker civ than Mongols. Even on water, the quick feudal time of Mongols can beat Viks occasionally.

 

[STEVEN SEAGOLD]

lol at bringing up Hollywood movies and then using those stereotypes to make your argument.

1. No they weren't. And irrelevant.

2. The Persian army were not slaves. It was a real army with a massive advantage in numbers. On the other hand your Vikings are mostly famous for pillaging Christian monasteries and killing defenseless priests. How brave.

3. Movie stereotype. We've found Viking graves and their average height was 5'7. Via science and not movie magic they were manlets.

4. The Vikings were known for raiding defenseless farms and monasteries and then fleeing before actual warriors arrived. They were pussies. I mean it may be true that running away is the best defense, but they don't get props for that tactic.

5. Lol no, this ain't 300. They wore heavy armor. And if you're going to use iron vs bronze as an argument then Vikings get destroyed by all the more modern warriors.

6. Viking tactics were subterfuge and raiding. The Spartans were an actual military force.

7. Drug addicted retards that don't wear armor and use PEDs. This isn't helping your argument.

8. Complete bullshit. The Spartans were trained to kill since childhood. Vikings weren't even full time warriors. They were farmers most of the time.

9. The Vikings were trained and had experience in the same way pirates and thieves were. Attacking and raiding the weak, using their seafaring tactics to avoid any real conflict.

You talk so much bullshit.

Varangian Guard.

 

[Sir Galahad]

Vikings were cool as fuck. But GOAT warriors? I think my old mob would mount a strong counter-argument.

View attachment 172433

Come at me bro.

 

[KnightTemplar]

Come at me bro.

Wooden armour? Aww, you guys are adorable!

 

[BisexualMMA]

1. Switzerland
2. Switzerland
3. Switzerland

 

[Halge]

1. Switzerland
2. Switzerland
3. Switzerland

Vikings don't climb mountains, or they woulda got them.

 

[original doom]

¨
Nah, i can literally rape 75% of Scandinavian male population. Scandinavians got thin bones and high estrogen. I mean look at Sweden.

If we talking about genetics when it comes to fighting then Africans, Slavs, Native Americans (and their modern ancestors) and Caucasians... are all more genetically giftet than Westerners.

With that said i am talking about average. I know they are exceptions and some genetically freaks in Scandinavia and the West.

Slavs aside every group you have mentioned has been murked by westerners. I take it your caucasian ? Who are these Native Americans and their ancestors, is it Pablo Juarez or Rodrigo Da silva ?

Modern Swedes are lame as hell though. But if you have such disdain why dont you move to your genetically superior homeland.

Im a little bit curious how you have even come to the fact that all these people are genetically superior, yet you didnt mention Arabs but went with Caucasians. I mean these people mentioned are not similar and you could argue that Slavs are Westerners, or close enough.

I mean the ultimate test is war yet none of those groups you have mentioned have won any well aside from Slavs.

 

[loyalyolayal]

GOAT at what?

Embracing christianity because their religion was the Daijiro Matsui in an mma context.

 

[loyalyolayal]

Wooden armour? Aww, you guys are adorable!

They are better archers though.

 

[Steve-French]

Giants of the North.

We Flex Now.

I'm Down with this. My Grandmother was from Norway, so I have a little Viking in me.

 

[original doom]

Ive always thought Vikings were a tad overrated. Perhaps too much romanticism.

 

[j123]

Ive always thought Vikings were a tad overrated. Perhaps too much romanticism.

Samurais are the overrated ones imo. Too much romanticism to the point people actually buy that they were "honorable citizens" while a good amount of them were gangsters.

 

[DeJulez]

Nice Hollywood movie. Let me hit you with some facts.

1. The Spartans were notorious for being homosexuals
2. The 300 fought an army of slaves
3. They were classically Mediterranean sized. Compared to the hulking Germanic nords, pipsqueaks. Roman historians would often revel in the stature and supremacy of the Germanic.
4. They were only really known for their tactical strategies as a unit. Really they stole this from earlier Greeks.
5. They wore speedos and used BRONZE AGE weapons. Nothing compared to the iron supremacy of the nords.
6. The Vikings used all the strategies of the Spartans. These were not unique formations, like the Phalanx. They may have been some of the first to utilize it, but everyone since then used it... Including the Vikings.
7. Vikings used hallucinogens and psycho-tropics, ale, and special herbs, to numb pain and go into a frenzied rage. These were known as Beserkers.
8. Both The Vikings and The Spartans had a distinct warrior culture. But the Viking one was much more extreme. Dying in battle was seen as the utmost honor, and thus was rewarded with afterlife in Valhalla (Heaven)... Whereas a life without glorious battle and death, was seen as weak, pathetic and a one way trip to Helheim (Self explanatory).
9. The Spartans were defenders, whereas the Vikings were raiders and conquerors. Vikings had the experience of actual variable combat scenarios, while The Spartans stayed in their barracks, training. They never encountered the various scenarios that the Vikings did.

Vikings as warriors are superior.

Aztecs wouldve smashed them in half.
Real Brutes over there in the land known as Mexico. Would devour you if they felt need. Vikings arent shit compared to them in the warrior aspect.

 

[DeJulez]

Average Viking.

Average Mediterranean/Roman/Spartan/Greek

The average Viking was 5'6.
The average Aztec was 5'7-5'8
The average Roman soldier or Spartan soldier was about 5'7-5'8.

They look to basically all be about the same size