Usman vs Buckley scorecard

dipstickjimmy

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
10,635
Not sure if anyone else noticed the 48-47 score on one judge's card but Mike Bell strikes again.
This guy is seemingly intentionally scoring rounds trying to affect the outcome of the fight. He gave Grasso a 10-8 trying to give her a chance to get a draw. Now he gives Buckley a round he clearly lost trying to give him a chance to get a draw. Usman outlanded him 20-11 and controlled him for nearly hald the round. This guy is corrupt as hell. Not saying he is doing it for money but he certainly is not scoring rounds honestly and he is blatantly trying to maipulate the outcomes or potential outcomes.
 
Official Result: Kamaru Usman defeats Joaquin Buckley by unanimous decision (49-46, 49-46, 48-47)



The best part is they were trying to say Usman wasn't landing sug strikes on the ground as he cut and reopened Buckleys cut in 4/5 rounds.
 
They still can't get competent judges apparently, because this shit is still happening all too often. And even the judges who are notorious for this shit get to keep their jobs apparently.
There are only two possible reasons, the athletic commissions makes a deliberate policy of hiring unqualified judges or they are corrupt.
 
I could easily see it being 3 rounds to 2 for usman. The 4th round was mostly on the feet buckley only was taken down in the last min. No way Buckley won or was it really a close fight but I can see how Buckley could have edged the 4th and won the 5th
 
Not sure if anyone else noticed the 48-47 score on one judge's card but Mike Bell strikes again.
This guy is seemingly intentionally scoring rounds trying to affect the outcome of the fight. He gave Grasso a 10-8 trying to give her a chance to get a draw. Now he gives Buckley a round he clearly lost trying to give him a chance to get a draw. Usman outlanded him 20-11 and controlled him for nearly hald the round. This guy is corrupt as hell. Not saying he is doing it for money but he certainly is not scoring rounds honestly and he is blatantly trying to maipulate the outcomes or potential outcomes.
How do people fight this, its a good observation and what is cool is this is an example of the plan not working but it easily could of considering how the 5th round played out? This is the stuff that needs to be on the first page of this forum.
 
Time & time again, we've seen fights where even though the right guy won, the rds that the judges gave were wrong compared to the consensus opinion. Example, lets say most people thought fighter A won rds 1, 3, 5. Lets assume 2 judges correctly scored the total 48-47 but they gave different rds to the winner. Just because the right guy won, doesn't mean the judges weren't incompetent. I think some judges aren't even paying full attention or don't give a F
 
Not sure if anyone else noticed the 48-47 score on one judge's card but Mike Bell strikes again.
This guy is seemingly intentionally scoring rounds trying to affect the outcome of the fight. He gave Grasso a 10-8 trying to give her a chance to get a draw. Now he gives Buckley a round he clearly lost trying to give him a chance to get a draw. Usman outlanded him 20-11 and controlled him for nearly hald the round. This guy is corrupt as hell. Not saying he is doing it for money but he certainly is not scoring rounds honestly and he is blatantly trying to maipulate the outcomes or potential outcomes.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/shoop-dat-mike-bell.4308018/
 
It’s crazy fools like me pay thousands to see these events live while some idiots get paid to see them live and judge them and still screw that up.
 
Back
Top