Crime Use it in a Sentence (special counsel thread v. 25)

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Senate wins may speak to gerrymandering. From my understanding the dems midterm performance in the house was impressive.


Christ

Did you just actually say That? I'll just be nice and tell you it's absolutely impossible to gerrymander the Senate
 
The Senate wins may speak to gerrymandering. From my understanding the dems midterm performance in the house was impressive.
The senate wins are unrelated to gerrymandering. They resulted from the seats that were being contested: 3/4 of the seats up for election had previously belonged to democrats, so the democrats had to win a greater proportion of races in order to maintain the status quo. They won about 2/3, so they lost ground.
 
Christ

Did you just actually say That? I'll just be nice and tell you it's absolutely impossible to gerrymander the Senate
Could you elaborate? I'm open to being corrected. I'd rather be corrected than continue to misunderstand the subject.
 
The senate wins are unrelated to gerrymandering. They resulted from the seats that were being contested: 3/4 of the seats up for election had previously belonged to democrats, so the democrats had to win a greater proportion of races in order to maintain the status quo. They won about 2/3, so they lost ground.
Appreciated.
 
Could you elaborate? I'm open to being corrected. I'd rather be corrected than continue to misunderstand the subject.

A senator is a representative voted on by the entire state. Making it gerrymander proof
 
Thanks for clarifying. My bad.
You’ll be shocked to know that states with smaller populations get as many senators as big ones too

That’s why there’s a house and that have to pass bills with bikodakcamera support
 
What thread are you in?

Let's talk about Campaign Finance Law. Just to stop this ignorant bullshit straight up (not your fault, I blame our "free press"). Campaign Finance Law is one of the very few laws where IGNORANCE OF THE LAW is actually a valid defense. No joke. I watched a panel of Democrat and Republican lawyers discuss it the other day (CSPAN) and was shocked to learn that fact. I wish the damn media would do its job and educate people on the matter.

Now... do you have ANYTHING on General Flynn? Or are you just looking to derail the thread?
You got sauce for this?
 
You’ll be shocked to know that states with smaller populations get as many senators as big ones too

That’s why there’s a house and that have to pass bills with bikodakcamera support
And bikodakcamera support is the hardest to come by.
 
It was a historic midterm win.

On topic, I doubt this gets thrown out. The judge appears to be grandstanding but the likelihood this is thrown out is nil.

Ya sure about that, bucko? If it's an "historic" win, surely it's in the top 10. No? Well, at least you beat the average by a few seats in the House (btw, the POTUS's party almost always loses seats in the House). But you know what's really historic? When the President's party gains seats in the Senate during a midterm. GOP beat the average by a whopping 6 seats (usually POTUS's party loses 4). In other words, Republicans' margin was more historic than Dems' ;)
 
Trump still directed Cohen to commit two felonies, correct?

Okay, just checking.
no

also obama paid rev wright 250k to not talk during his election
 
Ya sure about that, bucko? If it's an "historic" win, surely it's in the top 10. No? Well, at least you beat the average by a few seats in the House (btw, the POTUS's party almost always loses seats in the House). But you know what's really historic? When the President's party gains seats in the Senate during a midterm. GOP beat the average by a whopping 6 seats (usually POTUS's party loses 4). In other words, Republicans' margin was more historic than Dems' ;)

Didn't the GOP lose over 300 seats at multiple levels as well? I kept hearing about Obama's term seeing over 1000 lost seats, yet if this rate kept up, Trump would eclipse Obama by a good deal.....
 
Ya sure about that, bucko? If it's an "historic" win, surely it's in the top 10. No? Well, at least you beat the average by a few seats in the House (btw, the POTUS's party almost always loses seats in the House). But you know what's really historic? When the President's party gains seats in the Senate during a midterm. GOP beat the average by a whopping 6 seats (usually POTUS's party loses 4). In other words, Republicans' margin was more historic than Dems' ;)
Winning the popular vote by 9 million as the dems did in the midterms is historic. Restored my faith in our cousins to the south quiet a bit. We're derailing here now I think.
 
If he cheated his taxes I won't feel bad for him when he goes down. Having said that, what does that have to do with Russia collusion?

Also as I stated way back in the beginning... The scope of this investigation seems to fly in the face of the 4th.

He (Trump) didn't cheat on any taxes. That would have been "leaked" prior to the elections, the Obama/Clinton friendly IRS brass was looking, you can believe that. So that is not a concern.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top