Again, they were around long before the ufc and they have more revenue from non-ufc related activities than from the ufc. And there’s zero to suggest that ruling one way or another on jones would move the ufc away from usada. And again, the idea that public blatantly unethical actions is the key to long term professional stability is sorta silly. And look, I get it. You started off by saying their was a huge financial incentive (“massive money”!!!) and now you’re afraid to concede you were wrong, for some reason……
Maybe you’re not aware that usada doesn’t actually do the testing?
You’re not even following your own argument. It’s YOU that is arguing the top of usada is doing things that YOU can detect, on a specific case, that is unethical and against science and facts. That’s YOUR argument. That’s what YOU believe. Yet you’re trying to at the same time argue that his peers in the profession can’t see it.
It's a fact that Jon Jones has been found guilty more than once for having more than one type of PED/banned substance in his system. I don't know why you're trying to argue his innocence. Congrats on losing that yellow card, by the way.