Urine Trouble (Mueller Thread v. 16)

Status
Not open for further replies.
If a candidate for the highest office in our country was sending up so many red flags that the FBI deemed it necessary to infiltrate the campaign there is only one person to blame.

Hint, it's not the FBI.

Have you ever heard of Watergate?
 
I have no idea what narrative change you're talking about


It went from “we’re investigating trumps ties to Russia”, to


3bvp.jpg



All this time they were just trying to protect Trump.



You can’t make this shit up...
 
Why don't you just save me the trouble and tell me if Harper was on Trump's campaign staff or not?


Because it’s a long story with a very suspicious ending. If you can’t be bothered to read it yourself, you won’t understand the context.
 
Why don't you just save me the trouble and tell me if Harper was on Trump's campaign staff or not?
Not part of the campaign, but is said to have sought out or had meetings with Page, Papadopoulos, and Clovis.
 
Not part of the campaign, but is said to have sought out or had meetings with Page, Papadopoulos, and Clovis.

So the "spy" wasn't really a spy and real issue is that the crooks on the campaign couldn't keep their mouths shut?
 
Homer how come you duck and ran when I provided you a source for Halpers history of spying?
Because you're a shitposting jackass, and your current narrative is just as incredibly dumb as your previous 15.
 
Oh, then obviously you know Meuller put out a statement that trump is not the target of his investigation.
Purely semantics, Mueller said Trump was a subject, which can change at any time. How many times has your narrative changed while trying to defend the indefensible? And I notice you won't touch what it says about dear leader supposedly being unaware his campaign being full of crooks?
 
So the "spy" wasn't really a spy and real issue is that the crooks on the campaign couldn't keep their mouths shut?
Pretty obviously if you've actually kept yourself appraised of all the facts in this investigation. It started because Papadopolous blabbed to an Australian diplomat.
 
Has it ever been corroborated that he infiltrated the Carter's government?

The article you linked in the other thread from 1983 says an ex aide made the allegation which Halper denied.

The article also said the FBI and House started investigations. I can't find formation about those investigations.

When I looked up that scandal he's barely even mentioned.

This is looking like a nothingburger to me



The informant is well known in Washington circles, having served in previous Republican administrations and as a source of information for the C.I.A. in past years, according to one person familiar with the source’s work.


^^^ nyt reporting he’s been a cia source for years.
 
Purely semantics, Mueller said Trump was a subject, which can change at any time. How many times has your narrative changed while trying to defend the indefensible? And I notice you won't touch what it says about dear leader supposedly being unaware his campaign being full of crooks?



My narrative has never budged.

Trump will walk, end of story.
 
Because you're a shitposting jackass, and your current narrative is just as incredibly dumb as your previous 15.



Lots of name calling, but you won’t address any of the reporting that’s been presented.

And see above,
 
Not part of the campaign, but is said to have sought out or had meetings with Page, Papadopoulos, and Clovis.

So the "spy" wasn't really a spy and real issue is that the crooks on the campaign couldn't keep their mouths shut?


Not part of the campaign, but is said to have sought out or had meetings with Page, Papadopoulos, and Clovis.


But you forgot the ending, the day the Meuller was appointed SC, who was on the radio bashing Trump?


Halper



Again, all coincidence.
 
It went from “we’re investigating trumps ties to Russia”, to


3bvp.jpg



All this time they were just trying to protect Trump.



You can’t make this shit up...

Lol

Yeah They are investigating Trump campaign ties to Russia.

And they also warned his campaign that Russia may make overtures to the campaign and they should report it if they do.
 
So the "spy" wasn't really a spy and real issue is that the crooks on the campaign couldn't keep their mouths shut?



Oh, btw this is wrong.

The man has been a cia asset for years (as reported by the nyt) and has a history of being involved in spying on presidential campaigns.
 
Lol

Yeah They are investigating Trump campaign ties to Russia.

And they also warned his campaign that Russia may make overtures to the campaign and they should report it if they do.



Not according to the WP as of yesterday.


They’re just trying to help trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top