Urine Trouble (Mueller Thread v. 16)

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOFL!!

Really? Read the articles. Read about Bidens son. This is real shit. It makes Cohen look like a small timer

Look, u will NEVER admit to wrongdoing by your side. So why continue this? It's fine, there are plenty of hypocrites on the right excusing this shit now so u are in good company
Use your own words big guy, you can do it.
 
For the record there was some run of mill shady stuff, nepotism in the Clinton foundation, and I don't excuse it, but it was a charity unlike Trump inc.
 
For the record there was some run of mill shady stuff, nepotism in the Clinton foundation, and I don't excuse it, but it was a charity unlike Trump inc.
Trump Inc?

So bagging 10s of millions. In Bidens sons case a Billion plus is what? LOFL!!!!

Like I said. You will excuse anything your side does. I will Hold Trump to the same standard I hold others.
 
But Trump is against the merger and isn't the Justice department demanding they sell off assets?

https://www.google.com/amp/deadline...me-warner-deal-directv-turner-1202385160/amp/

So Cohen didn't help?
Pardon me, I should have extended that sentence
It's absolutely blatant that Cohen was getting paid by companies with serious pending deals/legislation for his access to the President, and that they were doing so through a shell company to hide the activity. It's a very very very short hop from there to stuff that is, or at least is supposed to be, quite illegal both for him and Trump.
This stuff is boiling out of the swamp right into our faces.
 
Of course it's mostly false. Because NO ONE can prove what the employees do. But u seemed to miss the part where 63% went to domestic employees. 10% to travel. This is INSANE!!

Would u give money to an international charity helping poor countries where 60+% went to domestic employees.

Also the foundation has NEVER explained what the employees do

It's absolutely amazing u would try to justify spending that amount of charitable funds on employees. It's as if u are blind

Do you know how this compares to the expenditures of companies you like?
 
Pardon me, I should have extended that sentence
It's absolutely blatant that Cohen was getting paid by companies with serious pending deals/legislation for his access to the President, and that they were doing so through a shell company to hide the activity. It's a very very very short hop from there to stuff that is, or at least is supposed to be, quite illegal both for him and Trump.
This stuff is boiling out of the swamp right into our faces.

Yes. If Trump was paid and you can show it influenced legislation.

But how has ATT Benefited? The DOJ is taking them to court

But I don't care if it's legal. If trump knew of this he should be booted out of office
 
For the record there was some run of mill shady stuff, nepotism in the Clinton foundation, and I don't excuse it, but it was a charity unlike Trump inc.

Didn't they use charity funds or venues owned by the charity for private events? I remember reading something around election time that they had done that for Chelseas wedding or reception, iirc.
 
Of charities you like. Typo. Do you know how it compares?

For international charities? It's horrible!!

Are u not understanding what is being said here?

U realize MOST charities grant out the money. By spending the money on DOMESTIC employees do u not understand the problem there?

Let's say I told u I was going to start a charity that would fund a clean water program in Africa. Then u found out afterwards I spent 63% of all the money domestically and 10% on travel. That doesn't include office supplies and events.

Would u be cool with me spending 1.5 million of 10 million u gave me in Africa
 
Y
Didn't they use charity funds or venues owned by the charity for private events? I remember reading something around election time that they had done that for Chelseas wedding or reception, iirc.
yes. A good chunk of money has gone to functions/meetings
 
Pardon me, I should have extended that sentence
It's absolutely blatant that Cohen was getting paid by companies with serious pending deals/legislation for his access to the President, and that they were doing so through a shell company to hide the activity. It's a very very very short hop from there to stuff that is, or at least is supposed to be, quite illegal both for him and Trump.
This stuff is boiling out of the swamp right into our faces.
I'm not convinced it's even a hop from illegal. Definitely Grant levels of corruption in this admin, maybe worse.
 
Yes. If Trump was paid and you can show it influenced legislation.

But how has ATT Benefited? The DOJ is taking them to court
Do they need to have benefited? Because what really matters is that it's very possible they illegally paid for access to the President, regardless of how it turned out. Michael Cohen was not doing consultant work for them. He's not qualified, it seems, for much if not all of the "work" these various giant and important companies paid him lucratively for during this time. So it begs the question, what was he actually doing and how was the President involved? That money had to go somewhere. If literally a single solitary dollar of it went to Trump, I may just have to revise my hitherto ironclad supposition that he is basically impossible to impeach for a variety of reasons.
 
How long will it be until "Sean hannity" has a paid "consulting" position at Novartis lol
 
I'm not convinced it's even a hop from illegal. Definitely Grant levels of corruption in this admin, maybe worse.
At least in Grant's case he was largely ignorant of what people were actually doing and how. He trusted the wrong dudes to run shit by proxy. The man was a fantastic general but not a good President and an even worse politician in general. He attracted a huge wake of greedy hangers on and was often too blind or naive to see what they were doing, or didn't understand it.
 
At least in Grant's case he was largely ignorant of what people were actually doing and how. He trusted the wrong dudes to run shit by proxy. The man was a fantastic general but not a good President and an even worse politician in general. He attracted a huge wake of greedy hangers on and was often too blind or naive to see what they were doing, or didn't understand it.
Yeah I shouldn't have insulted Grant like that lol.
 
Yeah I shouldn't have insulted Grant like that lol.
He was mostly a pretty good dude. Not at all suited for politics and legislative decision making, however. Won the fuck out of the Civil War, though. His legacy will always have that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top