- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 7,693
- Reaction score
- 443
Well, of course they have a value in a champion's legacy, but we have to put things in perspective.
I often read that a champion is not 'legit' because he doesn't have a lot of title defenses. Well, if the fighter in question went on a 10 fights win streak and cleaned out the division before winning the belt, then in my opinion he doesn't need 10 title defenses to be considered 'legit'.
Let's take 2 opposite examples : Demetrious Johnson and Tony Ferguson
- Demetrious Johnson, once considered one of the most dominant UFC champion, got the FLW belt after only 2 victories. He then went on a 11 fights win streak before losing to Cejudo, which means he had 11 title defenses.
- Tony Ferguson will fight Khabib for the LW title. If he beats Khabib and becomes the champ, he'll be on a 13 fights win streak, and completely have cleaned out the division while having ZERO title defenses.
My point is : Is Demetrious Johnson more legit than Tony Ferg because he has more title defenses ? I don't believe so.
I often read that a champion is not 'legit' because he doesn't have a lot of title defenses. Well, if the fighter in question went on a 10 fights win streak and cleaned out the division before winning the belt, then in my opinion he doesn't need 10 title defenses to be considered 'legit'.
Let's take 2 opposite examples : Demetrious Johnson and Tony Ferguson
- Demetrious Johnson, once considered one of the most dominant UFC champion, got the FLW belt after only 2 victories. He then went on a 11 fights win streak before losing to Cejudo, which means he had 11 title defenses.
- Tony Ferguson will fight Khabib for the LW title. If he beats Khabib and becomes the champ, he'll be on a 13 fights win streak, and completely have cleaned out the division while having ZERO title defenses.
My point is : Is Demetrious Johnson more legit than Tony Ferg because he has more title defenses ? I don't believe so.