• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

International UK Prime Minister declares his support of cousin marriage

Again, seeing as you're not pathetic, what are you actually doing about it other than moaning on a karate forum?

It's always funny to me how these types of people constantly scream about how immigrants are or will inevitably destroy everything...when much of this impending doom could have been avoided if their forefathers had just stayed the f*ck in Europe. It's almost like immigration/colonization is also ONLY bad when people who arent them do it.
 
It's always funny to me how these types of people constantly scream about how immigrants are or will inevitably destroy everything...when much of this impending doom could have been avoided if their forefathers had just stayed the f*ck in Europe. It's almost like immigration/colonization is also ONLY bad when people who arent them do it.
A lot of these backwards cultures benefited from colonialism. It’s indisputable. Now the third world is making the first world in their image because the Europeans are pussies.
 
Gay consenting incest.

To me, still should be illegal. Are you disagreeing?
No, incest between immediate family should be illegal and is taboo in the vast majority of the world’s cultures.

Can't say the same about cousin marriage, in fact it's legal in at least a few states in the US.
 
No, incest between immediate family should be illegal and is taboo in the vast majority of the world’s cultures.

Can't say the same about cousin marriage, in fact it's legal in at least a few states in the US.
So why did you even bring it up?

Should cousin marriage be legal?
 
It's always funny to me how these types of people constantly scream about how immigrants are or will inevitably destroy everything...when much of this impending doom could have been avoided if their forefathers had just stayed the f*ck in Europe. It's almost like immigration/colonization is also ONLY bad when people who arent them do it.

You're not making a point here. My forefathers did stay in Europe. I'm in Europe right now. Born & bred. You don't know what the word "forefathers" means. You also use the words "immigration" and "colonization" interchangeably which only further proves how stupid you are.

Muslims, for example, have a long history of conquest, but cry when it happens to them. They view their history of conquest as not only perfectly okay, but something to feel proud of.

Giz1u2x-Wg-AAXOWA.jpg

Giz1x-Ab-XMAA3q-Ld.jpg

Giz1v0j-Wo-AEt-KJ.jpg

Giz1x7-BWg-AAHXfa.png


And let's not forget the Muslim enslavement of non-Muslims (mostly black Africans, but also an estimated 1.5 million Europeans in the Barbary slave trade).

You will, of course, ignore the details of this post and just respond with your usual vapid bullshit, along with a laughing response to further drive home just how vapid you are. 👍

But I never get tired of the 'diversity is a good thing and you're a fool to deny it, and also it's revenge and you deserve everything you get' responses. So thanks for that.
 
Should cousin marriage be legal?
I think so but I don't feel that strongly either way. The reason I used to bring it up is because every argument for gay marriage as a right applies to cousin marriage as well but no one cares about arguing gay marriage anymore so it's a moot point as far as I'm concerned.
 
What if they're gay or infertile cousins? And how far does this go? Should ethnicities at risk for recessive diseases be barred or otherwise have their marriages regulated?
They should go where that is acceptable.
 
I think so but I don't feel that strongly either way. The reason I used to bring it up is because every argument for gay marriage as a right applies to cousin marriage as well but no one cares about arguing gay marriage anymore so it's a moot point as far as I'm concerned.
The same could be extended for close family incest. As a culture, we should eliminate this backward mentality.
 
You see why people immediately called you out for defending cousin marriage? It’s a funny position to have.
It's not lost on me why it attracts bad faith critics like you but as I said it's a moot point for me. Gay marriage in the US was codified by Congress so it's advocates need not appeal to some vague right and hope for judicial activism but rather can point to concrete legislation which, IIRC, had bipartisan support even.
 
It's not lost on me why it attracts bad faith critics like you but as I said it's a moot point for me. Gay marriage in the US was codified by Congress so it's advocates need not appeal to some vague right and hope for judicial activism but rather can point to concrete legislation which, IIRC, had bipartisan support even.
We have a lot more gays than cousin fuckers. You'll never see a national law either way unless it's happening enough for people to care.
 
We have a lot more gays than cousin fuckers. You'll never see a national law either way unless it's happening enough for people to care.
Yeah and in previous threads on the matter that was my point, that the difference between the two is the existence of an activist class arguing for one which doesn't exist for the other.
 
Yeah and in previous threads on the matter that was my point, that the difference between the two is the existence of an activist class arguing for one which doesn't exist for the other.
I'd be more concerned avuncular marriage is legal in Rhode Island for Jews. Or was, I don't really keep up on such things
 
Back
Top