- Joined
- May 30, 2019
- Messages
- 60,526
- Reaction score
- 133,577
Another addition to my ignore list.
I'll take that as nothing then.
Another addition to my ignore list.
Again, seeing as you're not pathetic, what are you actually doing about it other than moaning on a karate forum?
A lot of these backwards cultures benefited from colonialism. It’s indisputable. Now the third world is making the first world in their image because the Europeans are pussies.It's always funny to me how these types of people constantly scream about how immigrants are or will inevitably destroy everything...when much of this impending doom could have been avoided if their forefathers had just stayed the f*ck in Europe. It's almost like immigration/colonization is also ONLY bad when people who arent them do it.
No, incest between immediate family should be illegal and is taboo in the vast majority of the world’s cultures.Gay consenting incest.
To me, still should be illegal. Are you disagreeing?
So why did you even bring it up?No, incest between immediate family should be illegal and is taboo in the vast majority of the world’s cultures.
Can't say the same about cousin marriage, in fact it's legal in at least a few states in the US.
It's always funny to me how these types of people constantly scream about how immigrants are or will inevitably destroy everything...when much of this impending doom could have been avoided if their forefathers had just stayed the f*ck in Europe. It's almost like immigration/colonization is also ONLY bad when people who arent them do it.
So why did you even bring it up?
Should cousin marriage be legal?
Guys, don't marry your cousins.
I think so but I don't feel that strongly either way. The reason I used to bring it up is because every argument for gay marriage as a right applies to cousin marriage as well but no one cares about arguing gay marriage anymore so it's a moot point as far as I'm concerned.Should cousin marriage be legal?
They should go where that is acceptable.What if they're gay or infertile cousins? And how far does this go? Should ethnicities at risk for recessive diseases be barred or otherwise have their marriages regulated?
The same could be extended for close family incest. As a culture, we should eliminate this backward mentality.I think so but I don't feel that strongly either way. The reason I used to bring it up is because every argument for gay marriage as a right applies to cousin marriage as well but no one cares about arguing gay marriage anymore so it's a moot point as far as I'm concerned.
Okay, don't care.The same could be extended for close family incest. As a culture, we should eliminate this backward mentality.
Alabama sweating over the news..
Okay, don't care.
It's not lost on me why it attracts bad faith critics like you but as I said it's a moot point for me. Gay marriage in the US was codified by Congress so it's advocates need not appeal to some vague right and hope for judicial activism but rather can point to concrete legislation which, IIRC, had bipartisan support even.You see why people immediately called you out for defending cousin marriage? It’s a funny position to have.
We have a lot more gays than cousin fuckers. You'll never see a national law either way unless it's happening enough for people to care.It's not lost on me why it attracts bad faith critics like you but as I said it's a moot point for me. Gay marriage in the US was codified by Congress so it's advocates need not appeal to some vague right and hope for judicial activism but rather can point to concrete legislation which, IIRC, had bipartisan support even.
Yeah and in previous threads on the matter that was my point, that the difference between the two is the existence of an activist class arguing for one which doesn't exist for the other.We have a lot more gays than cousin fuckers. You'll never see a national law either way unless it's happening enough for people to care.
I'd be more concerned avuncular marriage is legal in Rhode Island for Jews. Or was, I don't really keep up on such thingsYeah and in previous threads on the matter that was my point, that the difference between the two is the existence of an activist class arguing for one which doesn't exist for the other.