Yeah, but that’s the thing: somewhere along the line, they have to fight for the title. The champ is supposed to the best, and I think they draw best (PPV numbers-wise) when they’ve had multiple defenses and we want to see who else they can beat, or cheer for someone to beat them. If GSP isn’t gonna hang around and rematch him, or defend a belt, it just doesn’t make sense to book it, If GSP won their non-title fight, you’d have a champ that we know isn’t the best, so who cares?I get you and agree in part as a fan I really don't care if the fight was not for a belt, the way the UFC treats belts it wouldn't really matter anyhow. From a promotion stand point I somewhat understand they don't wanna risk their champ losing to a part-timer, but so what? Doesn't make Khabib any less of a fighter losing to the likes of GSP in fact it could actually be used as a selling point do a rematch and sell it as for real fight with the belt on the line this time.
But GSP at this stage just wants to do specialty fights with selected opponents. If GSP was to win with no belt it would be talked about for a few months but he's not in the UFC mix or on the roaster. Khabib goes back to be being unbeaten within the current ranks of his division I wouldn't see him as any less than the tough human sob that he already is and still very sell able for promoter and sponsor.
Yea better to say ex LHW instead of saying Bisping.... We all know why that fight happened.He fought an ex-LHW for the title. Get a grip.
Well, in fairness. GSP is a pretty straightforward guy. He gave himself ulcerative colitis getting up to MW. I'm sure he didn't see that coming when he agreed to defend the belt. I'm sure he intended to defend it, just wasn't going to sacrifice his long term health to do it.In before GSP fans try to convince me why UFC should most definitely make 169lbs weightclass for GSP and Khabib to compete in, and why it's ok to break contract not to defend your belt in case you win.
i dont think thats legal.Just make a two or three fight deal and include a clause that if GSP wins and doesn’t defend he gets fined 1 million. Sure he’d defend then.
Yeah. Sort of like how Canelo's career was really hurt after he lost to Mayweather.As a fan, I don’t care. If I was a promoter, there’s no way in hell that I’d book that. Why risk having your champ beaten with no long term payoff?
That was a title fight. And correct me if wrong, because I totally admit that I’m not a boxing expert, but didn’t Mayweather defend the titles he won in that fight against Maidana?Yeah. Sort of like how Canelo's career was really hurt after he lost to Mayweather.
DC already beat Stipe once.but the ufc is trying to make dc-stipe 3, and we all know dc is retiring afterwards, win or lose. i think the difference is dana loves dc.
Yeah, but that’s the thing: somewhere along the line, they have to fight for the title. The champ is supposed to the best, and I think they draw best (PPV numbers-wise) when they’ve had multiple defenses and we want to see who else they can beat, or cheer for someone to beat them. If GSP isn’t gonna hang around and rematch him, or defend a belt, it just doesn’t make sense to book it, If GSP won their non-title fight, you’d have a champ that we know isn’t the best, so who cares?
In before GSP fans try to convince me why UFC should most definitely make 169lbs weightclass for GSP and Khabib to compete in, and why it's ok to break contract not to defend your belt in case you win.
Just make a two or three fight deal and include a clause that if GSP wins and doesn’t defend he gets fined 1 million. Sure he’d defend then.
I'm surprised GSP didn't try and fight Mighty Mouse when he was in the UFC. At least he draws the line somewhere.....
How about structure it this way:I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect a contract like that wouldn't hold up in court, because the defense would argue you can't force someone to risk their health (ie get into the cage) if they don't want to. Probably the best they could do is take a million off of any fight GSP did after that if he ever fought again.
“I know Khabib wanted to have that fight,” Georges St-Pierre told ESPN. “I want it, but the thing is, if you look from the UFC’s side, I think it’s normal if I put myself in their shoes. They didn’t want to take the risk of me winning the title and then after vacating again.
"I didn’t even want it for the title, I would rather do it not for a title. For me, it was because I considered Khabib, right now, the best fighter in the world, and he wanted to fight me as well so I thought it was a good fan fight.
“They had other plans for Khabib and I understand that. They had a lot to lose and if they invest into that fight and their investment goes out after, it’s not a good move.
“In a way, I could take that as a compliment because maybe they saw me as a threat for them. That means maybe they thought I could win the fight. If they let me fight him, it’s because they think [Khabib] would have lost.”
I wonder if Dana had any inkling that Conor wasn’t gonna defend shit when he booked those fights? He could’ve had a clue, because I think Conor was a double champ before and didn’t defend shit, but that was in a much smaller promotion. I also agree about fans having a short term memory.Conor won two belts in two different divisions and everybody knew he wasn't the best. But he skirted that question by actually never defending them belts. But I do get and understand your point I just think most real fight fanz know GSP as no interest in sticking around and going through the fight grind again. I don't see much difference between GSP fighting Bisping and him fighting Khabib. GSP won vacated and the fight world moved on without a hitch I find fight fanz have a very short memory usually lasts until the next big fight, but as I said I totally get where you're coming from it's just a fight I would like to see regardless if there's a belt on the line I just wanna see two highly skilled fighters faceoff.