Felder did more damage and hit harder. Just another bad decision.
And he had the forward aggressionFelder did more damage and hit harder. Just another bad decision.
even the 5th?? come on man, it was really even before the takedown and then he had control for over a minute.And he had the forward aggression
not a robbery, close fight but I thought Felder took over the last three rounds
I wouldn’t call that control but yea, he got the takedowneven the 5th?? come on man, it was really even before the takedown and then he had control for over a minute.
yeah overall i thought it was a close fight, but scoring it round by round I can't give Felder more than 2 rounds, round 3 was close and 4 was for felder, but 1,2 and 5 were hooker's. But yeah that s jsut my opinionI wouldn’t call that control but yea, he got the takedown
Thought Felder landed the better shots that round as well
Hurt hooker several times throughout the fight
The only honest answer is if you say the other guy won. You can not get rid of bias, everyone think their fighter wins every time. Everyone should stated which fighter you bet and which fighter you think won, than we all can judge with that info.
Post
I like to see your bet slip of Felder or I want to bet someone that you have money on Hooker.Excellent proof that most media members don't even bother watching the fight critically and thinking for themselves, but solely go off what the commentary team claims is happening.
I had Hooker winning rounds 1-3 and am really curious which of those Felder supposedly won. Felder clearly won round 4. Round 5 was 50/50 and could go to either man.
So that's either 3-2 or 4-1 Hooker.
He put a few units on Hooker you seem confused.I like to see your bet slip of Felder or I want to bet someone that you have money on Hooker.