forget all the other rounds, but round 5, i think its pure robbery to give this round to Pantoja....For what? Because he was hanging on for dear life on Moreno's back? I think its a horrible way to score round 5 where Moreno was destroying Pantoja on the feet for majority of that round before a stalemate where literally nothing happened...
Ive said this more and more in recent events where im noticing judges are falling back into the "pillow wrestling" phase from GSP days, where a single takedown or any grappling whats so ever instantly overrides anything else leading up to the grappling...which is just stupid...
In round 5, Moreno clearly was the aggressor for those who count that as 1 of the criteria, Moreno clearly did the most damage in that round, and clearly landed the best power shots of the round before the eventual stalemate, so how does Pantoja get that round? based off of what? He isnt in control of that position, that position is a stalemate, Pantoja has to hang on or he is going to fall down if he tries anything significant, how is that position scoring that much to override everything else that happened in that round for 3 and a half minutes?
Im not going to say who should have won or who i thought won cuz its not about that for this thread, but im more shocked at how people are giving these rounds away at any sign of grappling just instantly ignoring anything that happened for majority of the round just a few seconds or minutes prior, wild to me.