I have no idea what you're talking about, but yes people are entitled to self defense if they're being threatened.Same question- when meal team 6 was armed to the teeth and creating road blocks in Oregon to stop cars and decide if they’re allowed to continue or not… the drivers had every reason and right to kill them?
What I described happened. Didn’t see any outrage by the right wingers tho…I have no idea what you're talking about, but yes people are entitled to self defense if they're being threatened.
Did you make a thread about it?What I described happened. Didn’t see any outrage by the right wingers tho…
Arguing facts of the case and thread equals a strawman argument lol. You're not even serious anymore. You brought unrelated events in your post lol.Yeah, that was point, hence saying I wanted to do one as well. Good job on looking dumb.
There were threads about the wild fires and the responses by the yokelsDid you make a thread about it?
So that's a no, then.There were threads about the wild fires and the responses by the yokels
ThisArguing facts of the case and thread equals a strawman argument lol. You're not even serious anymore. You brought unrelated events in your post lol.
Right wingers "well you killed someone we dont like so we will pardon you"
Protesters "what the fuck?"
Right wingers " this is a glorious day for justice because the Shooter got away with killing someone we don't like"
A straw man fallacy is a kind of logical fallacy that occurs when a person deliberately distorts their opponent’s argument and proceeds to argue against that distortion instead of the actual position.
The bad thing is it's not an over the top characterization of this thread.This
Is an over the top caricature of the opposing opinion. No thinks murderers should be released because they don't like the person killed.
I'm glad I was able to educate you. Good job on looking doubly dumb.
Do you suddenly not feel this is a great win for justice?
That's what the pardon is about, we all know it including @Mr Holmes.Whitney Mitchell, Foster’s fiancée, said Abbott’s decision “has made us all less safe.” She called Foster the love of her life and said she was heartbroken by this “lawlessness.”
“With this pardon, the Governor has desecrated the life of a murdered Texan, impugned that jury’s just verdict, and declared that citizens can be killed with impunity as long as they hold political views that are different from those in power,” she said in a statement.
she sounds like every whiny relative of a criminal I ever heard.Well that's quite the strawman from his completely unbiased fiance.
I have no idea what you're talking about, but yes people are entitled to self defense if they're being threatened.
He is also a Pedo, do we celebrate that part as well?Why can’t we just celebrate the moment? An innocent man was set free, and a BLM thug can no longer terrorize the streets of Texas.
That's what the pardon is about, we all know it including @Mr Holmes.
That doesn't change much for me. He was put in a situation where he wasn't allowed to retreat and a man coming at him to potentially execute him. As far as I know he didn't break any laws by being there.You're looking at this situation too much in a vacuum man. When somebody deliberately goes to a threatening place and states his intent that he's looking to get himself in a situation where he can kill a bunch of people, it's a lot different from your standard self defense case.
This is the 1st I'm hearing of this. Whats going on?He is also a Pedo, do we celebrate that part as well?
The bad thing is it's not an over the top characterization of this thread.
Many, including yourself, are celebrating that a convicted murderer that stated he want to do such a thing and planned out how he would do something similar to what he did, is getting a pardon. Do you suddenly not feel this is a great win for justice? You suddenly dont feel this murder was not justified. Your own statements make it clear that you dont feel that way.
You don't like people protesting in the street and apparently think that people have a right to drive and run red lights. The agitator in this case killed someone and you are happy the convicted murder is pardoned of his crimes.
Ill run it for you again . A Protester in the street got shot by a guy that ran a red light. The shooter that had made statements and planned out such an event. He then went out and killed a person legally open carrying a firearm. The shooter himself stated that the gun was never pointed at him. Contributors such as yourself have made the case that this is justified. You are now happy a convicted murder is getting a pardon for killing the protester. That pretty much lines up exactly with what I said that you are calling a strawman.
That doesn't change much for me. He was put in a situation where he wasn't allowed to retreat and a man coming at him to potentially execute him. As far as I know he didn't break any laws by being there.